Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: A rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation

Implementation Science

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Keith, Rosalind E ^a   Crosson, Jesse C ^a   O'Malley, Ann S ^a   Cromp, DeAnn ^b   Taylor, Erin Fries ^a  

^a MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH   (United States)

^b GROUP HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Actionable findings; Barriers and facilitators; Implementation framework; Practice transformation; Primary care redesign; Qualitative methods; Rapid cycle evaluation

Indexed keywords

CASE STUDY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEADERSHIP; MEDICAID; MEDICARE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGISTRATION; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; STAFF; EVALUATION STUDY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; METHODOLOGY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 85012042820     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0550-7     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alexander JA, Hearld LR. Methods and metrics challenges of delivery-system research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:15.
2. Glasgow RE, Chambers D. Developing robust, sustainable, implementation systems using rigorous, rapid and relevant science. Clin Transl Sci. 2012;5(1):48-55.
3. Tomoaia-Cotisel A, Scammon DL, Waitzman NJ, Cronholm PF, Halladay JR, Driscoll DL, et al. Context matters: the experience of 14 research teams in systematically reporting contextual factors important for practice change. Ann Fam Med. 2014;11(S1):S115-23.
4. Kessler R, Glasgow RE. A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(6):637-44.
5. Peek CJ, Glasgow RE, Stange KC, Klesge LM, Purcell EP, Kessler RS. The 5 R's: an emerging bold standard for conducting relevant research in a changing world. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(5):447-55.
6. Shrank W. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation's blueprint for rapid-cycle evaluation of new care and payment models. Health Aff. 2013;32(4):807-12.
7. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.
8. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.
9. Center for Clinical Management Research. Consolidated framework for implementation research. Ann Arbor: Center for Clinical Management Research; 2014. Available from: http://cfirguide.org/. Accessed 3 Feb 2016
10. Damschroder LJ, Lowery JC. Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). Implement Sci. 2013;8:51.
11. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Comprehensive primary care initiative. Baltimore: CMS; 2016. Available from: https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/comprehensive-primary-care-initiative/. Accessed 9 Feb 2016.
12. Taylor EF, Dale S, Peikes D, Brown R, Ghosh A, Crosson J, Anglin G, Keith R, Shapiro R. Evaluation of the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative: first annual report. Princeton: Mathematica Policy Research; 2015. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
13. Dale SB, Ghosh A, Peikes DN, Day TJ, Yoon FB, Taylor EF, Swankoski K, O'Malley AS, Conway PH, Rajkumar R, Press MJ, Sessums L, Brown R. Two-year costs and quality in the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(24):2345-56.
14. Peikes D, Taylor EF, Dale S, O'Malley A, Ghosh A, Anglin G, Swankoski K, Zutshi A, Converse L, Brown R. Evaluation of the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative: second annual report. Princeton: v; 2016. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
15. King N. Doing template analysis. In: Cassell C, Symon G, editors. Qualitative organizational research: core methods and current challenges. London: Sage; 2012. p. 426-50.
16. Sinkovics RR, Alfoldi EA. Facilitating the interaction between theory and data in qualitative research using CAQDAS. In: Cassell C, Symon G, editors. Qualitative organizational research: core methods and current challenges. London: Sage; 2012. p. 109-31.
17. Mason J. Qualitative researching. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2002.
18. Friese S. ATLAS.ti 7.5.Version 7. Berlin: ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH; 2015. Available from: http://atlasti.com/. Accessed 23 Mar 2016
19. Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2014.
20. Etz RS, Keith RE, Maternick AM, Stein KL, Sabo RT, Hayes MS, Sevak P, Holland J, Crosson JC. Supporting practices to adopt registry-based care (SPARC): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2015;10:46.
21. Mendel P, Meredith LS, Schoenbaum M, Sherbourne CD, Wells KB. Interventions in organizational and community context: a framework for building evidence on dissemination and implementation in health services research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2008;35(1):21-37.
22. Kottke TE, Solberg LI, Nelson AF, Belcher DW, Caplan W, Green LW, et al. Optimizing practice through research: a new perspective to solve an old problem. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(5):459-62.