Supporting practices to adopt registry-based care (SPARC): Protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Implementation Science

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Etz, Rebecca S ^a   Keith, Rosalind E ^b   Maternick, Anna M ^a   Stein, Karen L ^a   Sabo, Roy T ^a   Hayes, Melissa S ^a   Sevak, Purvi ^b   Holland, John ^b   Crosson, Jesse C ^b  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Disease registry; Implementation; Population health; Primary care; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; HUMAN; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGISTER; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

ADULT; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; DIABETES MELLITUS; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; REGISTRIES;

EID: 84927926342     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0232-2     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes statistics report, 2014: estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.
2. Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Gregg EW, Barker LE, Williamson DF. Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence. Popul Health Metr. 2010;8(1):29.
3. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(4):1033-46.
4. Dall TM, Zhang Y, Chen YJ, Quick WW, Yang WG, Fogli J. The economic burden of diabetes. Health Affairs (Project Hope). 2010;29(2):297-303.
5. Narayan KM, Gregg EW, Fagot-Campagna A, Engelgau MM, Vinicor F. Diabetes-a common, growing, serious, costly, and potentially preventable public health problem. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2000;50 Suppl 2:S77-84.
6. Sloan FA, Bethel MA, Ruiz D, Shea AM, Shea AH, Feinglos MN. The growing burden of diabetes mellitus in the US elderly population. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(2):192-9.
7. Trogdon JG, Hylands T. Nationally representative medical costs of diabetes by time since diagnosis. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(12):2307-11.
8. Ziemer DC, Miller CD, Rhee MK, Doyle JP, Watkins C, Cook CB, et al. Clinical inertia contributes to poor diabetes control in a primary care setting. Diabetes Educator. 2005;31(4):564-71.
9. Van Bruggen R, Gorter K, Stolk R, Klungel O, Rutten G. Clinical inertia in general practice: widespread and related to the outcome of diabetes care. Fam Pract. 2009;26(6):428-36.
10. Grant RW, Lutfey KE, Gerstenberger E, Link CL, Marceau LD, McKinlay JB. The decision to intensify therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from an experiment using a clinical case vignette. J Am Board Fam Med. 2009;22(5):513-20.
11. Bolen SD, Bricker E, Samuels TA, Yeh H-C, Marinopoulos SS, McGuire M, et al. Factors associated with intensification of oral diabetes medications in primary care provider-patient dyads: a cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(1):25-31.
12. Bolen SD, Samuels TA, Yeh H-C, Marinopoulos S, McGuire M, Abuid M, et al. Failure to intensify antihypertensive treatment by primary care providers: a cohort study in adults with diabetes mellitus and hypertension. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(5):543-50.
13. Schmittdiel JA, Uratsu CS, Karter AJ, Heisler M, Subramanian U, Mangione C, et al. Why don't diabetes patients achieve recommended risk factor targets? Poor adherence versus lack of treatment intensification. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(5):588-94.
14. Grant R, Adams AS, Trinacty CM, Zhang F, Kleinman K, Soumerai SB, et al. Relationship between patient medication adherence and subsequent clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes glycemic management. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(4):807-12.
15. McEwen LN, Bilik D, Johnson SL, Halter JB, Karter AJ, Mangione CM, et al. Predictors and impact of intensification of antihyperglycemic therapy in type 2 diabetes: Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD). Diabetes Care. 2009;32(6):971-6.
16. Shah BR, Hux JE, Laupacis A, Zinman B, van Walraven C. Clinical inertia in response to inadequate glycemic control: do specialists differ from primary care physicians? Diabetes Care. 2005;28(3):600-6.
17. Subramanian U, Schmittdiel JA, Gavin N, Traylor A, Uratsu C, Selby J, et al. The association of patient age with cardiovascular disease risk factor treatment and control in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(9):1049-52.
18. Sharma MA, Cheng N, Moore M, Coffman M, Bazemore AW. Patients with high-cost chronic conditions rely heavily on primary care physicians. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014;27(1):11-2.
19. Spann SJ, Nutting PA, Galliher JM, Peterson KA, Pavlik VN, Dickinson LM, et al. Management of type 2 diabetes in the primary care setting: a practice-based research network study. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4(1):23-31.
20. Strickland PAO, Hudson SV, Piasecki A, Hahn K, Cohen D, Orzano AJ, et al. Features of the Chronic Care Model (CCM) associated with behavioral counseling and diabetes care in community primary care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010;23(3):295-305.
21. Sperl-Hillen JM, O'Connor PJ. Factors driving diabetes care improvement in a large medical group: ten years of progress. Am J Manag Care. 2005;11(5 Suppl):S177-85.
22. Elliott DJ, Robinson EJ, Sanford M, Herrman JW, Riesenberg LA. Systemic barriers to diabetes management in primary care: a qualitative analysis of Delaware physicians. Am J Med Qual. 2011;26(4):284-90.
23. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: defining the PCMH. http://pcmh.ahrq.gov/page/defining-pcmh (2015).
24. Bojadzievski T, Gabbay RA. Patient-centered medical home and diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(4):1047-53.
25. Davis K, Abrams M, Stremikis K. How the Affordable Care Act will strengthen the nation's primary care foundation. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(10):1201-3.
26. Cusak CM, Knudson AD, Kronstadt JL, Singer RF, Brown AL. Practice-based population health: information technology to support transformation to proactive primary care. AHRQ publication no. 10-0092-EF; 2010. pcmh.ahrq.gov/page/defining-pcmh.
27. Goldberg DG, Kuzel AJ. Elements of the patient-centered medical home in family practices in Virginia. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(4):301-8.
28. Crosson JC, Ohman-Strickland PA, Cohen DJ, Clark EC, Crabtree BF. Typical electronic health record use in primary care practices and the quality of diabetes care. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(3):221-7.
29. Eggleston EM, Klompas M. Rational use of electronic health records for diabetes population management. Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14(4):1-10.
30. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare program; revisions to payment policies under the physician fee schedule, clinical laboratory fee schedule, access to identifiable data for the Center for Medicare and Medicaid innovation models & other revisions to Part B for CY 2015. 2014. https://www.federalregister.gov/a/2014-26183 .
31. Edwards ST, Landon BE. Medicare's chronic care management payment-payment reform for primary care. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2049-51.
32. Rittenhouse DR, Casalino LP, Shortell SM, McClellan SR, Gillies RR, Alexander JA, et al. Small and medium-size physician practices use few patient-centered medical home processes. Health Affairs (project Hope). 2011;30(8):1575-84.
33. Crabtree BF, Nutting PA, Miller WL, McDaniel RR, Stange KC, Jaen CR, et al. Primary care practice transformation is hard work: insights from a 15-year developmental program of research. Med Care. 2011;49:S28-35.
34. Peterson KA, Radosevich DM, O'Connor PJ, Nyman JA, Prineas RJ, Smith SA, et al. Improving diabetes care in practice: findings from the TRANSLATE trial. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(12):2238-43.
35. Crabtree BF, Nutting PA, Miller WL, Stange KC, Stewart EE, Jaén CR. Summary of the National Demonstration Project and recommendations for the patient-centered medical home. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8 Suppl 1:S80-90.
36. Balasubramanian BA, Chase SM, Nutting PA, ULTRA. Study Team, Cohen DJ, Strickland PAO, et al. Using Learning Teams for Reflective Adaptation (ULTRA): insights from a team-based change management strategy in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(5):425-32. Doi: 10.1370/afm.1159.
37. Selby JV. Health systems, patients factors, and quality of care for diabetes: a synthesis of findings from the TRIAD study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(4):940-7.
38. Ackermann RT, Thompson TJ, Selby JV, Safford MM, Stevens M, Brown AF, et al. Is the number of documented diabetes process-of-care indicators associated with cardiovascular risk factor levels, patient satisfaction, or self-rated quality of diabetes care? The TRIAD Study. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(9):2108-13.
39. Mangione CM, Gerzoff RB, Williamson DF, Steers WN, Kerr EA, Brown AF, et al. The association between quality of care and the intensity of diabetes disease management programs. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(2):107-16.
40. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology: 2014 Edition EHR Certification Criteria Grid Mapped to Meaningful Use Stage 1. http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/2014editionehrcertificationcriteria_mustage1.pdf (2014).
41. Virginia Commonwealth University Department of Family Medicine and Population Health: ACORN. http://www.familymedicine.vcu.edu/research/fmresearch/acorn/ (2015).
42. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen J. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8:139.
43. Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2003;48(6.2):1-22.
44. Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Stange KC. Understanding practice from the ground up. J Fam Pract. 2001;50(10):881-7.
45. Gupta SK. Intention-to-treat concept: a review. Perspect Clin Res. 2011;2(3):109-12.
46. Wild H. The economic rationale for adherence in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Manag Care. 2012;18:S43-8.
47. Damschroder LJ, Aaron DC, Keith RE, Kirsch SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health service research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.