User interface considerations to prevent self-driving carsickness

Adjunct Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive VehicularApplications, AutomotiveUI 2015

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 14-19

  Diels, Cyriel ^a   Bos, Jelte E ^b  

^a Faculty of Engineering and Computing   (United Kingdom)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Anticipation; Carsickness; Design; Displays; Motion sickness; Sensory conflict; Vehicle automation

Indexed keywords

CRASHWORTHINESS; DESIGN; DISEASES; DISPLAY DEVICES; RISK PERCEPTION;

ANTICIPATION; CARSICKNESS; MOTION SICKNESS; SENSORY CONFLICT; VEHICLE AUTOMATIONS;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 84960155795     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2809730.2809754     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Diels, C. 2014. Will autonomous vehicles make us sick? In Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors, Sarah Sharples and Steve Shorrock (eds.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 301-307.
2. Diels, C, Jelte E. Bos. Self-Driving Carsickness. Applied Ergonomics. (Accepted for publication).
3. Bos, J. E. 2004. How motions make people sick such that they perform less: a model based approach. In NATO RTO/AVT-110 Symp. Habitability of Combat and Transport Vehicles: Noise, Vibration and Motion. Prague, CZ, 4-7 October:27.1-11.
4. Le Vine, S., Zolfaghari, A., Polak, J. 2015. The tension between autonomous cars" impacts on intersection level-of-service and their occupants" use of travel time for leisurely or economicallyproductive activities. In Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January 2015.
5. Forbes. 2014. Self-Driving Cars Can Be Relaxing, As The Rinspeed XchangE Concept Shows. Retrieved October 29, 2014 from http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewdepaula/201 4/02/28/rinspeed-xchange-concept-hasinteriordesigned-for-autonomous-driving
6. Forbes. 2013. Autonomous Driving Tech Package Will Be An Option On Mercedes Vehicles By 2020. Retrieved October 29, 2014 from http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewdepaula/201 3/09/30/autonomous-driving-willbecome-anoption-on-regular-mercedes-models-by-2020
7. Reason, J. T., Brand, J. J. 1975. Motion Sickness. London, New York, San Francisco: Academic Press.
8. Griffin, M. J., Newman, M. M. 2004. Visual Field Effects on Motion Sickness in Cars. Aviat Space Environ Med. 75, 9:739-748.
9. Kato K, Kitazaki S. 2005. A study of carsickness of rear-seat passengers when watching a carmounted display. In Proceedings of the 40th UK Conf. Human Response to Vibration, Liverpool, UK, 13-15 September:1-7.
10. Howard, I. P. 1982. Human visual orientation. Chichester, Wiley.
11. Rolnick, A., Lubow, R. E. 1991. Why is the driver rarely sick? The role of controllability in motion sickness. Ergonomics. 34, 7:867-879.
12. Oman, C. M. 1982. A heuristic mathematical model for the dynamics of sensory conflict and motion sickness. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 392:1-44.
13. Feenstra PJ, Bos JE, Gent RNHW van. 2011. A visual display enhancing comfort by counteracting airsickness. Displays. 32:194-200.
14. Turner, M., Griffin, M. J. 1999. Motion sickness in public road transport: the relative importance of motion, vision and individual differences. Br. J. Psychol. 90, 4:519-530.
15. Emmerik ML van, Vries SC de, Bos JE. 2011. Internal and external fields of view affect cybersickness. Displays. 32:169-174.
16. Kato, K. and Kitazaki, S. 2008. Improvement of ease of viewing images on an invehicle display and reduction of carsickness. SAE Technical Paper Series No. 2008-01-0565. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.