Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: association of circumferential myocardial strain and mortality

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 1-10

  Musa, Tarique Al ^a   Uddin, Akhlaque ^a   Swoboda, Peter P ^a   Fairbairn, Timothy A ^a   Dobson, Laura E ^a   Singh, Anvesha ^b   Garg, Pankaj ^a   Steadman, Christopher D ^b   Erhayiem, Bara ^a   Kidambi, Ananth ^a   Ripley, David P ^a   McDiarmid, Adam K ^a   Haaf, Philip ^a   Blackman, Daniel J ^c   Plein, Sven ^a,c   McCann, Gerald P ^b   Greenwood, John P ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c LEEDS GENERAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aortic stenosis; Aortic valve replacement; Myocardial tissue tagging; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Indexed keywords

GADOTERIC ACID;

AGE; AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BASAL LEFT VENTRICLE CIRCUMFERENTIAL STRAIN; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CIRCUMFERENTIAL MYOCARDIAL STRAIN; COMPLEMENTARY SPATIAL MODULATION OF MAGNETIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIASTOLIC STRAIN RATE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC PRESSURE; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HUMAN; IMAGING SOFTWARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MID LEFT VENTRICLE CIRCUMFERENTIAL STRAIN; MORTALITY RISK; MULTICENTER STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PERCUTANEOUS AORTIC VALVE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTOLIC STRAIN RATE; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; BIOMECHANICS; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CINE MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONVALESCENCE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENGLAND; HEART CONTRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MECHANICAL STRESS; MECHANICAL TORSION; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RISK FACTOR; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOFTWARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; AREA UNDER CURVE; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RISK FACTORS; ROC CURVE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOFTWARE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; STROKE VOLUME; TORSION, MECHANICAL; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 85011911861     PISSN: 10976647     EISSN: 1532429X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12968-017-0329-7     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Iung B, Vahanian A. Degenerative calcific aortic stenosis: a natural history. Heart. 2012;98 Suppl 4:iv7-13.
2. Ozkan A, Kapadia S, Tuzcu M, Marwick TH. Assessment of left ventricular function in aortic stenosis. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8:494-501.
3. Kaden JJ, Dempfle CE, Grobholz R, et al. Interleukin-1 beta promotes matrix metalloproteinase expression and cell proliferation in calcific aortic valve stenosis. Atherosclerosis. 2003;170:205-11.
4. Wang B, Chen H, Shu X, et al. Emerging role of echocardiographic strain/strain rate imaging and twist in systolic function evaluation and operative procedure in patients with aortic stenosis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;17:384-91.
5. Swoboda PP, Larghat A, Zaman A, et al. Reproducibility of myocardial strain and left ventricular twist measured using complementary spatial modulation of magnetization. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;39:887-94.
6. Singh A, Steadman CD, Khan JN, et al. Intertechnique agreement and interstudy reproducibility of strain and diastolic strain rate at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparison of feature-tracking and tagging in patients with aortic stenosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41:1129-37.
7. Galli E, Lancellotti P, Sengupta PP, Donal E. LV mechanics in mitral and aortic valve diseases: value of functional assessment beyond ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2014;7:1151-66.
8. Carasso S, Cohen O, Mutlak D, et al. Relation of myocardial mechanics in severe aortic stenosis to left ventricular ejection fraction and response to aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107:1052-7.
9. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:S1-44.
10. Vaquette B, Corbineau H, Laurent M, et al. Valve replacement in patients with critical aortic stenosis and depressed left ventricular function: predictors of operative risk, left ventricular function recovery, and long term outcome. Heart. 2005;91:1324-9.
11. Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, Pibarot P. Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation. 2007;115:2856-64.
12. Piazza N, Grube E, Gerckens U, et al. Procedural and 30-day outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the third generation (18 Fr) corevalve revalving system: results from the multicentre, expanded evaluation registry 1-year following CE mark approval. EuroIntervention. 2008;4:242-9.
13. Meredith IT, Worthley SG, Whitbourn RJ, et al. Transfemoral aortic valve replacement with the repositionable Lotus Valve System in high surgical risk patients: the REPRISE I study. EuroIntervention. 2014;9:1264-70.
14. Fairbairn TA, Steadman CD, Mather AN, et al. Assessment of valve haemodynamics, reverse ventricular remodelling and myocardial fibrosis following transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to surgical aortic valve replacement: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. Heart. 2013;99:1185-91.
15. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Longitudinal myocardial shortening in aortic stenosis: ready for prime time after 30 years of research? Heart. 2010;96:95-6.
16. Attias D, Macron L, Dreyfus J, et al. Relationship between longitudinal strain and symptomatic status in aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26:868-74.
17. Becker M, Kramann R, Dohmen G, et al. Impact of left ventricular loading conditions on myocardial deformation parameters: analysis of early and late changes of myocardial deformation parameters after aortic valve replacement. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20:681-9.
18. Iwahashi N, Nakatani S, Kanzaki H, Hasegawa T, Abe H, Kitakaze M. Acute improvement in myocardial function assessed by myocardial strain and strain rate after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006;19:1238-44.
19. Lancellotti P, Donal E, Magne J, et al. Impact of global left ventricular afterload on left ventricular function in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a two-dimensional speckle-tracking study. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11:537-43.
20. Ross Jr J. Afterload mismatch and preload reserve: a conceptual framework for the analysis of ventricular function. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1976;18:255-64.
21. Carasso S, Mutlak D, Lessick J, Reisner SA, Rakowski H, Agmon Y. Symptoms in severe aortic stenosis are associated with decreased compensatory circumferential myocardial mechanics. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:218-25.
22. Kaku K, Takeuchi M, Tsang W, et al. Age-related normal range of left ventricular strain and torsion using three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27:55-64.
23. Biederman RW, Doyle M, Yamrozik J, et al. Physiologic compensation is supranormal in compensated aortic stenosis: does it return to normal after aortic valve replacement or is it blunted by coexistent coronary artery disease? An intramyocardial magnetic resonance imaging study. Circulation. 2005;112:I429-36.
24. Grabskaya E, Becker M, Altiok E, et al. Impact of transcutaneous aortic valve implantation on myocardial deformation. Echocardiography. 2011;28:397-401.
25. Carasso S, Cohen O, Mutlak D, et al. Differential effects of afterload on left ventricular long- and short-axis function: insights from a clinical model of patients with aortic valve stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement. Am Heart J. 2009;158:540-5.
26. Delgado V, Tops LF, van Bommel RJ, et al. Strain analysis in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing surgical valve replacement. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:3037-47.
27. Meimoun P, Elmkies F, Benali T, et al. Assessment of left ventricular twist mechanics by two-dimensional strain in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2011;60:259-66.
28. Rost C, Korder S, Wasmeier G, et al. Sequential changes in myocardial function after valve replacement for aortic stenosis by speckle tracking echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11:584-9.
29. Poulin F, Carasso S, Horlick EM, et al. Recovery of left ventricular mechanics after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: effects of baseline ventricular function and postprocedural aortic regurgitation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27:1133-42.
30. Sengupta PP, Tajik AJ, Chandrasekaran K, Khandheria BK. Twist mechanics of the left ventricle: principles and application. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2008;1:366-76.
31. Nagel E, Stuber M, Burkhard B, et al. Cardiac rotation and relaxation in patients with aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:582-9.
32. Stuber M, Scheidegger MB, Fischer SE, et al. Alterations in the local myocardial motion pattern in patients suffering from pressure overload due to aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1999;100:361-8.
33. Lindqvist P, Zhao Y, Bajraktari G, Holmgren A, Henein MY. Aortic valve replacement normalizes left ventricular twist function. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12:701-6.
34. Pasipoularides A. LV twisting and untwisting in HCM: ejection begets filling. Diastolic functional aspects of HCM. Am Heart J. 2011;162:798-810.
35. van Dalen BM, Tzikas A, Soliman OI, et al. Left ventricular twist and untwist in aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiol. 2011;148:319-24.
36. Young AA, Cowan BR. Evaluation of left ventricular torsion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14:49.
37. Monin JL, Quere JP, Monchi M, et al. Low-gradient aortic stenosis: operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome: a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics. Circulation. 2003;108:319-24.
38. Sannino A, Gargiulo G, Schiattarella GG, et al. Increased mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis and low ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of 6898 patients. Int J Cardiol. 2014;176:32-9.
39. Dahl JS, Videbaek L, Poulsen MK, Rudbaek TR, Pellikka PA, Moller JE. Global strain in severe aortic valve stenosis: relation to clinical outcome after aortic valve replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:613-20.
40. Kusunose K, Goodman A, Parikh R, et al. Incremental prognostic value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:938-45.
41. Mahmod M, Bull S, Suttie JJ, et al. Myocardial steatosis and left ventricular contractile dysfunction in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:808-16.