Recognizing human activities from smartphone sensors using hierarchical continuous hidden Markov models

International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Ronao, Charissa Ann ^a   Cho, Sung Bae ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

accelerometer; continuous hidden Markov model; gyroscope; hierarchical classifier; Human activity recognition; sensors; smartphone

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETERS; GYROSCOPES; MARKOV PROCESSES; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SENSORS; SIGNAL ENCODING; SMARTPHONES; TRELLIS CODES;

CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE; CONTINUOUS HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL; DISCRIMINATIVE CLASSIFIERS; FEATURE COMPUTATION; HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFIERS; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES; HUMAN ACTIVITY RECOGNITION; SYSTEM ARCHITECTURES;

HIDDEN MARKOV MODELS;

EID: 85011854067     PISSN: 15501329     EISSN: 15501477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1550147716683687     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Lara OD and Labrador MA. A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Commun Surveys Tutor 2013; 15(3): 1192-1209.
2. Chen L, Hoey J, Nugent C, et al. Sensor-based activity recognition. IEEE T Syst Man Cy C 2012; 42(6): 790-808.
3. Bulling A, Blanke U and Schiele B. A tutorial on human activity recognition using body-worn inertial sensors. ACM Comput Surv 2014; 46(3): 1-33.
4. Khan AM. Recognizing physical activities using Wii remote. Int J Inf Educ Technol 2013; 3(1): 60-62.
5. Sung J, Ponce C, Selman B, et al. Unstructured human activity detection from RGBD images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Saint Paul, MN, 14-18 May 2012, pp.842-849. New York: IEEE.
6. Pei L, Guinness R, Chen R, et al. Human behavior cognition using smartphone sensors. Sensors 2013; 13(2): 1402-1424.
7. Anguita D, Ghio A, Oneto L, et al. A public domain dataset for human activity recognition using smartphones. In: Proceedings of the European symposium on artificial neural networks (ESANN), Bruges, 24-26 April 2013, pp.437-442. ESANN.
8. Jong K, Marchiori E, Sebag M, et al. Feature selection in proteomic pattern data with support vector machines. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE symposium on computational intelligence in bioinformatics and computational biology, La Jolla, CA, 7-8 October 2004, pp.41-48. New York: IEEE.
9. Altun K, Barshan B and Tuncxel O. Comparative study on classifying human activities with miniature inertial and magnetic sensors. Pattern Recogn 2010; 43(10): 3605-3620.
10. Barshan B and Yurtman A. Investigating inter-subject and inter-activity variations in activity recognition using wearable motion sensors. Comput J 2016; 59(9): 1345-1362.
11. Chen FR, Wilcox LD and Bloomberg DS. A comparison of discrete and continuous hidden Markov models for phrase spotting in text images. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on document analysis and recognition, Montreal, QC, Canada, 14-16 August 1995, pp.398-402. New York: IEEE.
12. Natarajan P and Nevatia R. Hierarchical multi-channel hidden semi Markov models. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on artificial intelligence, Hyderabad, India, 6-12 January 2007, pp.2562-2567. AAAI Press.
13. Bao L and Intille S. Activity recognition from userannotated acceleration data. In: Proceedings of the international conference on pervasive computing, Vienna, 18-23 April 2004, pp.1-17. Springer.
14. Gao L, Bourke AK and Nelson J. Evaluation of accelerometer based multi-sensor versus single-sensor activity recognition systems. Med Eng Phys 2014; 36(6): 779-785.
15. Cleland I, Kikhia B, Nugent C, et al. Optimal placement of accelerometers for the detection of everyday activities. Sensors 2013; 13: 9183-9200.
16. Parkka J, Ermes M, Korpipaa P, et al. Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors. IEEE T Inf Technol B 2006; 10(1): 119-128.
17. Gao L, Bourke AK and Nelson J. A comparison of classifiers for activity recognition using multiple accelerometerbased sensors. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 11th international conference on cybernetic intelligent systems, Limerick, Ireland, 23-24 August 2012, pp.149-153. New York: IEEE.
18. Chernbumroong S, Atkins A and Yu H. Activity classification using a single wrist-worn accelerometer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on software, knowledge, information management and applications, Benevento, 8-11 September 2011, pp.1-6. New York: IEEE.
19. Gupta P and Dallas T. Feature selection and activity recognition system using a single triaxial accelerometer. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2014; 61: 1780-1786.
20. Sharma A, Lee Y-D and Chung W-Y. High accuracy human activity monitoring using neural network. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on convergence and hybrid information technology, Busan, South Korea, 11-13 November 2008, pp.430-435. New York: IEEE.
21. Rubaiyeat H, Kim T-S and Hasan MK. Real-time recognition of daily human activities using a single tri-axial accelerometer. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on embedded and multimedia computing, Cebu, Philippines, 11-13 August 2010, pp.1-5. New York: IEEE.
22. Yang J. Toward physical activity diary: motion recognition using simple acceleration features with mobile phones. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on interactive multimedia for consumer electronics, Beijing, China, 19-24 October 2009, pp.1-10. New York: ACM.
23. Kwapisz J, Weiss G and Moore S. Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newsl 2010; 12(2): 74-82.
24. Rabiner LR. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. P IEEE 1989; 77(2): 257-286.
25. Archer K and Kimes R. Empirical characterization of random forest variable importance measures. Comput Stat Data An 2008; 52(4): 2249-2260.
26. Olguin DO and Pentland A. Human activity recognition: accuracy across common locations for wearable sensors. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on wearable computers, Montreux, 11-14 October 2006, pp.11-13. New York: IEEE.
27. Travelsi D, Mohammed S, Chamroukhi F, et al. An unsupervised approach for automatic activity recognition based on hidden Markov model regression. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 2013; 10(3): 829-835.
28. Mannini A and Sabatini A. Machine learning methods for classifying human physical activity from on-body accelerometers. Sensors 2010; 10: 1154-1175.
29. Khan AM, Lee Y-K, Lee S-Y, et al. A triaxial accelerometer-based physical-activity recognition via augmented-signal features and a hierarchical recognizer. IEEE T Inf Technol B 2010; 14(5): 1166-1172.
30. Lee Y-S and Cho S-B. Activity recognition using hierarchical hidden Markov models on a smartphone with 3D accelerometer. In: Proceedings of the international conference on hybrid intelligent systems, Wroclaw, 23-25 May 2011, pp.460-467. Berlin: Springer.
31. Luktarhan N, Jia X, Hu L, et al. Multi-stage attack detection algorithm based on hidden Markov model. In: Proceedings of the international conference on web information systems and mining, Chengdu, China, 26-28 October 2012, pp.275-282. New York: ACM.
32. Lee D-H, Kim D-Y and Jung J-I. Multi-stage intrusion detection system using hidden Markov model algorithm. In: Proceedings of the international conference on information science and security, Seoul, South Korea, 10-11 January 2008, pp.72-77. New York: IEEE.
33. Nguyen-Duc-Thanh N, Lee S-Y and Kim D-H. Twostage hidden Markov model in gesture recognition for human robot interaction. Int J Adv Robot Syst 2012; 9(39): 1-10.
34. Ronao C and Cho S-B. Human activity recognition using smartphone sensors with two-stage continuous hidden Markov models. In: Proceedings of the international conference on natural computation, Xiamen, China, 19-21 August 2014, pp.681-686. New York: IEEE.
35. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn 2001; 45(1): 5-32.
36. Genuer R, Poggi JM and Tuleau-Malot C. Variable selection using random forests. Pattern Recogn Lett 2010; 31(14): 2225-2236.
37. Yan Z, Subbaraju V, Chakraborty D, et al. Energy-efficient continuous activity recognition on mobile phones: an activity-adaptive approach. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on wearable computers, Newcastle upon Tyne, 18-22 June 2012, pp.17-24. New York: IEEE.
38. Becker RA, Chambers JM and Wilks AR. The new S. language. Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, 1988.
39. Jolliffe I. Principal component analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
40. Venables WN and Ripley BD. Modern applied statistics with S. 4th ed. New York: Springer, 2002.
41. Zhang M and Sawchuk AA. USC-HAD: a daily activity dataset for ubiquitous activity recognition using wearable sensors. In: Proceedings of the ACM international conference on ubiquitous computing (UbiComp), Pittsburgh, PA, 5-8 September 2012, pp.1036-1043. New York: ACM.