Critical infrastructure impact assessment due to flood exposure

Journal of Flood Risk Management

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 22-33

  Pant, R ^a   Thacker, S ^a   Hall, J W ^a   Alderson, D ^b   Barr, S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Critical infrastructures; customer disruptions; flood catchment; flood hazard; infrastructure networks; risks; vulnerability

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENT; CRITICAL ANALYSIS; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOOD DAMAGE; FLOODPLAIN; INFRASTRUCTURE; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PRIORITIZATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 85011579980     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1753318X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12288     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. AECOM. Toward a City of Melbourne climate change adaptation strategy. A risk assessment and action plan discussion paper. Responding with resilience. Melbourne: AECOMe, 2008.
2. Barredo J.I. Normalised flood losses in Europe: 1970–2006. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 2009, 9, (1), 97–104.
3. Bornschein A. & Pohl, R. Lessons learned from the 2002 flood in Saxony, Germany. In Proceedings of the 40th Defra Flood and Coastal management Conference, York, UK, 2005, 05B.3.1 – 05B.3.12.
4. British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). BT suffers huge broadband failure [online]. 2011. www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-15154020 [Accessed 10 September 2015].
5. Cabinet Office. Strategic framework and policy statement on improving the resilience of critical infrastructure to disruption from natural hazards. London: Cabinet Office, 2010.
6. Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). Civil aviation authority: UK airport statistics[online]. 2010. https://www.caa.co.uk/Data-and-analysis/UK-aviation-market/Airports/Datasets/UK-Airport-data/Airport-data-1990-onwards/ [Accessed 15 September 2015].
7. Committee on Climate Change (CCC). Managing climate risks to the well-being and the economy: Adaptation Sub-Committee Progress Report 2014. London: CCC, 2014.
8. Dawson R, Hall J, Sayers P, Bates P. & Rosu C. Sampling-based flood risk analysis for fluvial dike systems. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2005, 19, (6), 388–402.
9. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). Digest of UK energy statistics [online], 2012. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/digest-of-uk-energy-statistics-dukes [Accessed 10 September 2015].
10. Department for Transport (DfT). Transport resilience review: a review of the resilience of the transport network to extreme weather event. London: Whitehall, 2014.
11. EC. Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks. Off. J. Eur. Union 2007. 50, 27–34.
12. Emanuelsson M.A.E, McIntyre N, Hunt C.F, Mawle R, Kitson J. & Voulvoulis N. Flood risk assessment for infrastructure networks. J. Flood Risk Manage. 2014, 7, (1), 31–41.
13. Evans E, Hall J, Penning-Rowsell E, Sayers P, Thorne C. & Watkinson A. Future flood risk management in the UK. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Water Manage. 2006, 159, (1), 53–61.
14. Gouldby B, Sayers P, Mulet-Marti J, Hassan M.A.A.M. & Benwell D. A methodology for regional-scale flood risk assessment. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Water Manage. 2008, WM3, 169–182.
15. Hall J.W, Dawson R.J, Sayers P.B, Rosu C, Chatterton J.B. & Deakin R. A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Water Maritime Eng. 2003, 156, (3), 235–248.
16. HM Government. Climate resilient infrastructure: preparing for a changing climate. London: The Stationary Office, 2011.
17. HM Government. UK climate change risk assessment: government report. London: The Stationary Office, 2012.
18. Homeland Security. NIPP 2013: partnering for critical infrastructure security and resilience. Washington, DC: Homeland Security, 2013.
19. Institution for Civil Engineers (ICE). The state of the nation: defending critical infrastructure. London: Institution of Civil Engineers, 2009.
20. Jongman B, Winsemius H.C, Aerts J.C, de Perez E.C, van Aalst M.K, Kron W. & Ward P.J. Declining vulnerability to river floods and the global benefits of adaptation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2015, 112, (18), E2271–E2280.
21. Kalantari Z, Nickman A, Lyon S.W, Olofsson B. & Folkeson L. A method for mapping flood hazard along roads. J. Environ. Manage. 2014, 133, 69–77.
22. Koks E.E, Bočkarjova M, Moel H. & Aerts J.C. Integrated direct and indirect flood risk modeling: development and sensitivity analysis. Risk Anal. 2015, 35, (5), 882–900.
23. Lee D.T. & Schachter B.J. Two algorithms for constructing a Delaunay triangulation. Int. J. Inform. Syst. Comput. Sci. 1980, 9, (3), 219–242.
24. McMillan, D. Disruptions at Gatwick Airport – Christmas Eve 2013. Report by David McMillan to the Board of Gatwick Airport Limited, 2014.
25. Merz B, Hall J, Disse M. & Schumann A. Fluvial flood risk management in a changing world. Nat. Hazards Earth Sys. Sci. 2010, 10, (3), 509–527.
26. Grid N. Electricity Ten Year statement, UK electricity transmission. London: National Grid, 2012.
27. Ordnance Survey. OS open data: mapping data and geographic information from Ordnance Survey [online]. 2013. https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/opendatadownload/products.html [Accessed 21 December 2013].
28. Pant R, Hall J.W. & Blainey S.P. Vulnerability assessment framework for interdependent critical infrastructures: case-study for Great Britain's rail network. Eur. J. Transport. Infrastruct. Res. 2016, 16, (1), 174–194.
29. Poljansek, K, Bono, F, Gutierrez, E. GIS-based method to assess seismic vulnerability of interconnected infrastructure: a case of EU gas and electricity networks. EU JRC 24275, 2010.
30. Rinaldi, S. M. Modeling and simulating critical infrastructures and their interdependencies. In: Proceedings of the 37th annual Hawaii international conference on System sciences, Hawaii, US 2004, 8.
31. Rinaldi S.M, Peerenboom J.P. & Kelly T.K. Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Contr. Syst. 2001, 21, (6), 11–25.
32. Seher W. & Löschner L. Vertical and horizontal risk-sharing in flood-related planning. In: Challenges for governance structures in urban and regional development, 2015, 301–310. Zurich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG.
33. Thacker S, Pant R. & Hall J.W. System-of-systems formulation and disruption analysis for multi-scale critical national infrastructures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2017 In Review.
34. Thaler T. Developing partnership approaches for flood risk management: implementation of inter-local co-operations in Austria. Water Int. 2014, 39, (7), 1018–1029.
35. Thaler T.A, Priest S.J. & Fuchs S. Evolving inter-regional co-operation in flood risk management: distances and types of partnership approaches in Austria. Reg. Environ. Change 2016, 16, (3), 841–853.
36. Thieken, A.H, Ackermann, V, Elmer, F, Kreibich, H, Kuhlmann, B, Kunert, U, Maiwald, H, Merz, B, Müller, M, Piroth, K. and Schwarz, J. Methods for the evaluation of direct and indirect flood losses. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Flood Defence: Managing Flood Risk, Reliability and Vulnerability, Toronto, Canada, 2008, Vol. 68, 110.
37. Wheater H. & Evans E. Land use, water management and future flood risk. Land Use Policy 2009, 26, S251–S264.
38. Zischg A, Fuchs S, Keiler M. & Stötter J. Temporal variability of damage potential on roads as a conceptual contribution towards a short-term avalanche risk simulation. Nat. Hazards Earth Sys. Sci. 2005, 5, (2), 235–242.