Social media as a public space for politics: Cross-national comparison of news consumption and participatory behaviors in the United States and the United Kingdom

International Journal of Communication

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 3304-3326

  Saldaña, Magdalena ^a   Mcgregor, Shannon C ^a   de Zúñiga, Homero Gil ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES   (Chile)

Author keywords

Cross national studies; News use; Political participation; Social media

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011578541     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19328036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Aalberg, T., van Aelst, P., & Curran, J. (2010). Media systems and the political information environment: A cross-national comparison. International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(3), 255-271. doi:10.1177/1940161210367422
2. American Association of Public Opinion Research. (2011). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Retrieved from http://aapor.org/Content/NavigationMenu/AboutAAPOR/StandardsampEthics/StandardDefinitions/StandardDefinitions2011.pdf
3. Bakker, T. P., & De Vreese, C. H. (2011). Good news for the future? Young people, Internet use, and political participation. Communication Research, 38(4), 451-470. doi:10.1177/0093650210381738
4. Bennett, W. L. (2012). The personalization of politics. Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644, 20-39. doi:10.1177/0002716212451428
5. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
6. Beyer, O., & Matthes, J. (in press). Attitudes toward illegal immigration and exposure to public service and commercial broadcasting in France, Norway, and the United States. International Journal of Communication.
7. Bimber, B., & Copeland, L. (2013). Digital media and traditional political participation over time in the U.S. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10, 125-137. doi:10.1080/19331681.2013.769925
8. Bimber, B., Flanagin, A., & Stohl, C. (2012). Collective action in organizations: Interaction and engagement in an era of technological change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9. Bode, L., Vraga, E. K., Borah, P., & Shah, D. V. (2013). A new space for political behavior: Political social networking and its democratic consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 414-429. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12048
10. Chadha, M., Avila, A., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2012). Listening in: Building a profile of podcast users and analyzing their political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(4), 388-401. doi:10.1080/19331681.2012.717481
11. Chadwick, A., & Howard, P. N. (2008). The handbook of Internet politics. London, UK: Routledge.
12. Cohen, A., Vigoda, E., & Samorly, A. (2001). Analysis of the mediating effects of personal-psychological variables on the relationship between socioeconomic status and political participation: A structural equations framework. Political Psychology, 22, 727-757. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00260
13. Conway, M. M. (1985). Political participation in the United States. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
14. Delli Carpini, M. X. (2004). Mediating democratic engagement: The impact of communications on citizens' involvement in political and civic life. In L. L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 395-434). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. Desilver, D. (2015). U.S. voter turnout trails most developed countries. Pew Research. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/05/06/u-s-voter-turnout-trails-most-developed-countries/
17. Di Gennaro, C., & Dutton, W. (2006). The Internet and the public: Online and offline political participation in the United Kingdom. Parliamentary Affairs, 59(2), 299-313. doi:10.1093/pa/gsl004
18. Dimitrova, D. V., Shehata, A., Strömback, J., & Nord, L. W. (2014). The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data. Communication Research, 41(1), 95-118. doi:10.1177/0093650211426004
19. Eveland, W. P., Hayes, A. F., Shah, D. V., & Kwak, N. (2005). Understanding the relationship between communication and political knowledge: A model-comparison approach using panel data. Political Communication, 22, 423-446. doi:10.1080/10584600500311345
20. Eveland, W. P., Jr., Shah, D. V., & Kwak, N. (2003). Assessing causality: A panel study of motivations, information processing and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research, 30, 359-386. doi:10.1177/0093650203253369
21. Finkel, S. E. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 891-913. doi:10.2307/2111186
22. Fraile, M. (2013). Do information-rich contexts reduce knowledge inequalities? The contextual determinants of political knowledge in Europe. Acta Politica, 48(2), 119-143. doi:10.1057/ap.2012.34
23. Free Press. (2014). Who owns the media? Retrieved from http://www.freepress.net/ownership/chart
24. Gibson, R. K., Lusoli, W., & Ward, S. (2005). Online participation in the UK: Testing a "contextualised" model of Internet effects. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 7(4), 561-583. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2005.00209.x
25. Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2002). Internet inherentemente personal: Cómo su uso influencia nuestras vidas [Internet inherently personal: How its use influences our lives]. Binaria, 3, 1-45.
26. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals' social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319-336. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
27. Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Valenzuela, S. (2011). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38, 397-421. doi:10.1177/0093650210384984
28. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Veenstra, A., Vraga, E., & Shah, D. V. (2010). Digital democracy: Reimagining pathways to political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(1), 36-51. doi:10.1080/19331680903316742
29. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
30. Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
31. Hochberg, Y. (1988). A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika, 75(4), 800-802. doi:10.1093/biomet/75.4.800
32. Holt, K., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J., & Ljungberg, E. (2013). Age and the effects of news media attention and social media use on political interest and participation: Do social media function as leveller? European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 19-34. doi:10.1177/0267323112465369
33. Hwang, H., Schmierbach, M., Paek, H. J., Gil de Zuniga, H., & Shah, D. V. (2006). Media dissociation, Internet use, and antiwar political participation: A case study of political dissent and action against the war in Iraq. Mass Communication & Society, 9(4), 461-483. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0904_5
34. Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405-431. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038
35. Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19-39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
36. Jung, N., Kim, Y., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14(4), 407-430. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.496135
37. Kaid, L. L., McKinney, M., & Tedesco, J. (2007). Introduction: Political information efficacy and young voters. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1093-1111. doi:10.1177/0002764207300040
38. Kang, N., & Kwak, N. (2003). A multilevel approach to civic participation individual length of residence, neighborhood residential stability, and their interactive effects with media use. Communication Research, 30(1), 80-106. doi:10.1177/0093650202239028
39. Kaufhold, K., Valenzuela, S., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2010). Citizen journalism and democracy: How user-generated news use relates to political knowledge and participation. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(3-4), 515-529. doi:10.1177/107769901008700305
40. Kemp, S. (2014, February 5). Social, digital and mobile in Europe in 2014. We Are Social. Retrieved from http://wearesocial.sg/blog/2014/02/social-digital-mobile-europe-2014
41. Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 50, 173-192. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1
42. Kim, Y., Hsu, S., & Gil de Zuniga, H. (2013). Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: The moderating role of personality traits. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 498-516. doi:10.1111/jcom.12034
43. Leonardi, P. M., & Meyer, S. R. (2015). Social media as social lubricant: How ambient awareness eases knowledge transfer. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(1), 10-34. http://abs.sagepub.com/content/59/1.toc
44. Livingstone, S., & Bovill, M. (Eds.). (2013). Children and their changing media environment: A European comparative study. London, UK: Routledge.
45. Lutz, A. (2014, June 14). These 6 corporations control 90% of the media in America. Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/these-6-corporations-control-90-of-the-media-in-america-2012-6#ixzz35ps8Z2jT
46. Martin, P. S. (2008). The mass media as sentinel: Why bad news about issues is good news for participation. Political Communication, 25(2), 180-193. doi:10.1080/10584600801985706
47. McLeod, D. M., Kosicki, G. M., & McLeod, J. M. (2002). Resurveying the boundaries of political communication effects. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 215-268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48. McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communications, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16, 315-336. doi:10.1080/105846099198659
49. Moon, S. J. (2013). Attention, attitude, and behavior second-level agenda-setting effects as a mediator of media use and political participation. Communication Research, 40(5), 698-719. doi:10.1177/0093650211423021
50. Neufeind, M., Jiranek, P., & Wehner, T. (2013). Beyond skills and structure: Justice dispositions as antecedents of young citizens' volunteering and political participation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. doi:10.1002/casp.2166
51. Nieman Journalism Lab. (n.d.). BBC News. Encyclo. Retrieved from http://www.niemanlab.org/encyclo/bbc-news/
52. Ofcom. (2014, June). News consumption in the UK: 2014 report. Retrieved from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/tv-research/news/2014/News_Report_2014.pdf
53. Office for National Statistics. (2013). Internet access: Households and individuals. Retrieved from: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/rdit2/Internet-access-households-and-individuals/2013/stb-ia-2013.html
54. Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55. Pattie, C., Seyd, P., & Whiteley, P. (2003). Citizenship and civic engagement: Attitudes and behaviour in Britain. Political Studies, 51, 443-468. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00435
56. Pew Research Center. (n.d.). Collecting survey data. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/methodology/u-s-survey-research/collecting-survey-data/
57. Pew Research Center. (2014). The Web at 25 in the U.S. Retrieved from http://www.pewInternet.org/2014/02/27/summary-of-findings-3/
58. Pew Research Center. (2015). Social media update 2014. Retrieved from http://www.pewInternet.org/2015/01/09/social-media-update-2014/
59. Pew Research Internet Project. (2012). Social media and political engagement. Retrieved from http://www.pewInternet.org/2012/10/19/social-media-and-political-engagement/
60. Prior, M. (2009). Improving media effects research through better measurement of news exposure. Journal of Politics, 71, 893-908. doi:10.1017/S0022381609090781
61. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of the American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
62. Quintelier, E., & Vissers, S. (2008). The effect of Internet use on political participation an analysis of survey results for 16-year-olds in Belgium. Social Science Computer Review, 26(4), 411-427. doi:10.1177/0894439307312631
63. Rojas, H., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2010). Comunicación y participación política en Colombia [Communication and political participation in Colombia]. In H. Rojas, I. B. Perez, & H. Gil de Zúñiga (Eds.), Comunicación y Comunidad [Communication and community] (pp. 13-64). Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
64. Sanders, K., & Hanna, M. (2012). British journalists. In D. H. Weaver & L. Willnat (Eds.), The global journalist in the 21st century (pp. 220-233). New York, NY: Routledge.
65. Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in Web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44, 409-432. doi:10.1023/A:1024232915870
66. Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32, 531-565. doi:10.1177/0093650205279209
67. Thompson, D. F. (1970). The democratic citizen. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68. Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2003). Unraveling the effects of the Internet on political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56(2), 175-185. doi:10.1177/106591290305600206
69. UK Political Info. (2015). General election turnout 1945-2015. Retrieved from http://www.ukpolitical.info/Turnout45.htm
70. Valenzuela, S., Kim, Y., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2012). Social networks that matter: Exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 163-184. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edr037
71. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72. Wattenberg, M. P. (2012). Is voting for young people? New York, NY: Pearson.
73. Weaver, D., & Drew, D. (1995). Voter learning in the 1992 presidential election: Did the "nontraditional" media and debates matter? Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 72, 7-17. doi:10.1177/107769909507200102
74. Weeks, B. E., & Holbert, R. L. (2013). Predicting dissemination of news content in social media: A focus on reception, friending, and partisanship. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90, 212-232. doi:10.1177/1077699013482906
75. World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers. (2014). World press trends. Retrieved from http://www.wan-ifra.org/microsites/world-press-trends
76. Yoo, S. W., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2014). Connecting blog, Facebook, and Twitter use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Communication & Society, 27(4) 33-48. doi:10.15581/003.27.4.33-48
77. Zaller, J. (2003). A new standard of news quality: Burglar alarms for the monitorial citizen. Political Communication, 20(2), 109-130. doi:10.1080/10584600390211136