The orchestration of learning and teaching methods in science education

Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 451-464

  Watts, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROEHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011519554     PISSN: 14926156     EISSN: 19424051     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14926150309556582     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Armstrong, SJ. (1999). Individual differences in cognitive style and their potential effects on organisational behaviour: A summary of recent empirical studies. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), International perspectives on individual differences. London: Ablex.
2. Griffard, P.B., & Wandersee, J.H. (1999). Meaningful learning in African American females. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 611-632.
3. Biggs, J. (1988). The role of metacognition in enhancing learning. Australian Journal of Education, 32, 127-138.
4. Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.
5. Biggs, J. (2002). Aligning the curriculum to promote good learning: The idea and ideals of constructive alignment. A paper presented at Constructive Alignment in Action: An Imaginative Curriculum, Symposium of the Learning and Teaching Support Network, Centre Point Conference Centre, London, November.
6. Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.
7. Cuthbert, R. (2002). Constructive alignment in the world of institutional management. Paper presented at Constructive Alignment in Action: An Imaginative Curriculum, Symposium of the Learning and Teaching Support Network, Centre Point Conference Centre, London, November.
8. Entwistle, N.J. (1997). The Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST). Edinburgh: Centre for Research on Learning and Instruction, University of Edinburgh.
9. Entwistle, N.J., McCune, V., & Walker, P. (2000). Conceptions, styles and approaches within higher education: Analytic abstractions and everyday experience. In R.J. Sternberg & K. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive, learning and thinking styles. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Falk, J.H. (2001). Free choice science education: How we learn science outside of school. New York: Teachers’ College Press.
11. Gardner, H. (1987). Frames of mind. London: Fontana.
12. Hayes, L. (2001). Teaching and learning science: A framework for teacher professional development. In D. Hodson (Ed.), OISE papers in STSE education (Vol. 2, pp. 159-176). Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto.
13. Hayes, J., & Allison, C.W. (1998). Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in an organisation. Human Relations, 51(7), 847-871.
14. Hodson, D. (2001). What counts as good science education? In D. Hodson (Ed.), OISE papers in STSE education (Vol. 2, pp. 7-22). Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto.
15. Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1992). The manual of learning styles. (Rev. ed.). Maidenhead: Peter Honey.
16. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17. Kyriacou, C. (1998). Essential teaching skills (2nd ed.). Cheltenham, UK: Stanley Thornes.
18. Millar, R„ & Osborne, J. (1999). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College London.
19. Montgomery, S.M., & Groat, L.N. (2002). Student learning styles and their implications for teaching. Mimeograph, Centre for Research on Learning and Teaching, University of Michigan.
20. Office for Standards in Education. (1995). Good teaching, effective departments. London: Author.
21. Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils and parents views of the role and value of the science curriculum: The focus group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441-468.
22. Oxford, R.L., & Anderson, N.J. (1995). A cross-cultural view of learning styles. Language Teaching, 28, 201-215.
23. Peters, O. (1998). Learning and teaching: Analysis and halfway from an international perspective. London: Kogan Page.
24. Riding, R. (2002). School learning and cognitive style. London: David Fulton Press.
25. Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11,193-215.
26. Riding, R., & Douglas, G. (1993). The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 297-307.
27. Riding, R.J., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies. London: David Fulton Press.
28. Rose, C., & Goll, L. (1992). Accelerate your learning. Aylesbury, UK: Accelerated Learning Systems.
29. Sadler-Smith, E. (1997). Learning styles: Framework and instruments. Educational Psychology, 17(112), 51-63.
30. Schmeck, R.R. (1988). Learning strategies and learning styles. New York: Plenum.
31. Stark, R., & Gray, D. (1999). Gender preferences in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 633-643.
32. Teacher Training Agency. (2002). Qualifying to teach: Handbook of guidance. London: Teacher Training Agency.
33. Watts, D.M., & Alsop, S. A. (2000). Terms of engagement: learners and school science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, University of Edmonton, May.
34. Witkin, H.A., Oltman, P.K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S.A. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures tests. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.