L’Alphabétisation technoscientifique et la démocratisation de la démocratie

Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 189-195

  Désautels, Jacques ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011468573     PISSN: 14926156     EISSN: 19424051     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14926150209556510     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Atkin, J., Helms, J. (1993). Getting serious about priorities in science education. Studies in Science Education, 21, 1-20.
2. Blades, D. (1996). Procedures of power and curriculum change. New York: Peter Lang.
3. Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., Barthes, Y. (2001). Agir dans un monde incertain. Essai sur la démocratie technique. Paris: Seuil.
4. de Certeau, M. (1990). L’invention du quotidien. 1. arts defaire. Paris: Gallimard.
5. Désautels, J. (2000). Science teacher preparation: An attempt at breaking the re-production cycle of the traditional model of teaching. Dans L. Steife et P. Thompson (Dirs.), Radical constructivism in action (pp. 195-212). London: Faimer Press.
6. Durant, J. (1999). Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding of science. Science and Public Policy, 26, 313-319.
7. Einsiedel, E., Jelsoe, E., Breck, T. (2001). Publics at the technology table: The consensus conference in Denmark, Canada, and Australia. Public Understanding of Science, 10, 83-98.
8. Fensham, P. (2002a). Time to change drivers for science education. Revue canadienne de l’enseignement des sciences, des mathématiques et des technologies, 2, 9-24.
9. Fensham, P. (2002b). De nouveaux guides pour l’alphabétisation scientifique. Revue canadienne de l’enseignement des sciences, des mathématiques et des technologies, 2, 133-149.
10. Foucault, M. (1971). L’ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.
11. Latour, B. (1999). Les politiques de la nature. Commentfaire entrer les sciences en démocratie. Paris: La Découverte.
12. Lewontin, R.C. (1991). Biology as ideology: The doctrine of DNA. New York: Harper Perennial.
13. Pestre, D. (2001). Études sociales des sciences, politique et retour sur soi. Revue du MA USS, 17, 180-196.
14. Semali, L., Kincheloe, J. (1999). What is indigenous knowledge? New York: Falmer Press.
15. Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers University Press.
16. Wynne, B. (1996). Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and public uptake of science. Dans A. Irwin et B. Wynne (Dirs.), Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology (pp. 19-46). London: Cambridge University Press.