Time to change drivers for scientific literacy

Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 9-24

  Fensham, Peter J ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011519615     PISSN: 14926156     EISSN: 19424051     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14926150209556494     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1989). Sciencefor all Americans: A Project 2061 report on goals in science, mathematics, and technology.Washington, DC: Author.
2. AAAS. (1993). Benchmarks of scientific literacy.Washington, DC: Author.
3. Andersen, A.M., & Sorensen, H. (1995). Nature/technology: Science education at primary level in Denmark. In A.M. Andersen, K. Schnack, and H. Sorensen (Eds.), Science-natur/teknik, assessment and learning (pp.5-26). Copenhagen: Royal Danish School of Educational Studies.
4. Atkin, J.M., & Helms, J. (1992). Testing in mathematics and science—for everyone. TIMSS Document Reference ICC413/NPC061. Vancouver: TIMSS International Coordinating Center.
5. Atkin, J.M., & Helms, J. (1993). Getting serious about priorities in science education. Studies in Science Education,21,1-20.
6. Blades, D.W. (1997). Procedures of power and curriculum change.New York: Peter Lang.
7. Bybee, R.W. (1997). Towards an understanding of scientific literacy. In W. Gräber and C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy: An international symposium.Kiel, Germany: I.P.N.
8. Eylon, B.-S., & Linn, M. (1988). Learning on instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in science education. Review of Educational Research, 58(3)251-301.
9. Fensham, P.J. (1991). Science and technology. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Curriculum (pp. 789-828). Chicago: AERA.
10. Fensham, P.J. (1998). The politics of legitimating and marginalizing companion meanings: Three Australian case stories. In D.A. Roberts and L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum (pp. 178-192). New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Fensham, P., & Harlen, W. (1999). School science and public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7),755-763.
12. Galbraith, P.L., Carss, M.C., Grice, R.D., Endean, L., & Wany, M. (1997). Towards scientific literacy for the third millennium: A view from Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 19(4), 447-468.
13. Gaskell, PJ. (1994). Assessing STS literacy: What is rational? In K. Boersma, K. Kortland, & J. van Trommel (Eds.), 7th IOSTE Symposium, Papers Part 1 (pp. 309-320). Endrecht, Netherlands: IOSTE Conference Committee.
14. Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
15. Hart, C. (1995). The story of a curriculum documentfor schoolphysics. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
16. Irwin, A., & Wynne, B. (Eds.). (1996). Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Jenkins, E.W. (1995). Central policy and teacher response? Scientific investigation in the National Curriculum of England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 17(4), 471-480.
18. Jenkins, E.W. (1997). Scientific and technological literacy for citizenship: What can we learn from the research and other evidence? Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education.
19. Kolsto, S.D. (2001). Science education for citizenship: Thoughtful decision making about science related social issues. Oslo: Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo.
20. Law, N., Fensham, P.J., Li, S., & Bing, W. (2000). Public understanding of science as basic literacy. Melbourne Studies in Education, 41(2),145-156.
21. Layton, D., Jenkins, E., Macgill, S., & Davey, A. (1993). Inarticulate Science? Perspectives on the public understanding of science and some implications for science education.Driffield, UK: Studies in Science Education.
22. Malcolm, C., Cole, J., Hogendoom, B., O’Keefe, D., & Reid, I. (1987). The science framework, P-10. Melbourne, Australia: Ministry of Education.
23. Millar, R. (1996). Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77(250),7-18.
24. Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future.London: School of Education, King’s College.
25. National Academy of Science (1996). National science education standards.Washington, DC: Author.
26. National Science Foundation (1983). Educating Americans for the twenty-first century: Report of the National Science Board Commission on pre-college education in mathematics, science and technology.Washington, DC: Author.
27. National Curriculum Council [NCC]. (1989). Science: Non-statutory guidance.London: Author.
28. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (1996). Literacy, economy and society. Results of the first international adult literacy survey.Paris: Author.
29. OECD/Programme for International Student Assessment [PISA]. (2000). Measuring student knowledge and skills: The PISA 2000 assessment of reading, mathematical and scientific literacy.Paris: Author.
30. Orpwood, G., & Garden, R.A. (1998). Assessing mathematics and science literacy. TIMSS Monograph No.4. Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.
31. Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (1996). Primary science: Past and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 27,99-147.
32. Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1994). Bibliography: Students alternative frameworks and science education(4th ed.). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
33. Roberts, D.A. (1982). Developing the concept of‘curriculum emphases’ in science education. Science Education, 66,243-260.
34. Roberts, D.A. (1983). Scientific literacy: Towards balance in setting goals for school science programs. Toronto: Guidance Centre, University of Toronto.
35. Royal Society (1985). The public understanding ofscience.London: Author.
36. Science Council of Canada. (1984). Science for every citizen: Educating Canadians for tomorrow s world. Summary of Report No. 36.Ottawa: Supply and Service Canada.
37. Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
38. Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. (Eds.). (1994). STS education: International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
39. Solomon, J. (1997). School science and the future of scientific culture. In R.T. Levinson & J. Thomas (Eds.), Science today: Problem or crisis? (pp. 151-162). London: Routledge.
40. UNESCO (1983). Science for all.Bangkok: UNESCO Office for Education in Asia and the Pacific.
41. Wellington, J. (2001). What is science education for?Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education,7,23-38.