De nouveaux guides pour l’alphabétisation scientifique

Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 133-149

  Fensham, Peter J ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011498401     PISSN: 14926156     EISSN: 19424051     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14926150209556506     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS], (1989). Sciencefor all Americans: A Project 2061 report on goals in science, mathematics, and technology. Washington (DC): Auteur.
2. AAAS. (1993). Benchmarks of scientific literacy. Washington (DC): Auteur.
3. Andersen, A.M., Sorensen, H. (1995). Nature/technology: Science education at primary level in Denmark. Dans A.M. Andersen, K. Schnack et H. Sorensen (Dirs.), Science-natur/teknik, assessment and learning (pp. 5-26). Copenhagen: Royal Danish School of Educational Studies.
4. Atkin, J.M., Helms, J. (1992). Testing in mathematics and science-for everyone. TIMSS Document Reference ICC413/NPC061. Vancouver: TIMSS International Coordinating Center.
5. Atkin, J.M., Helms, J. (1993). Getting serious about priorities in science education. Studies in Science Education, 21, 1-20.
6. Blades, D.W. (1997). Procedures of power and curriculum change. New York: Peter Lang.
7. Bybee, R.W. (1997). Towards an understanding of scientific literacy. Dans W. Gräber et C. Boite (Dirs.), Scientific literacy: An international symposium. Kiel (Allemagne): I.P.N.
8. Conseil de recherche scientifique du Canada. (1984). Science for every citizen: Educating Canadians for tomorrow’s world. Summary of Report No. 36. Ottawa: Supply and Service Canada.
9. Eylon, B.-S., Linn, M. (1988). Learning on instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in science education. Review of Educational Research, 58,251-301.
10. Fensham, P.J. (1991). Science and technology. Dans P. Jackson (Dir.), Handbook of Research on Curriculum (pp. 789-828). Chicago: AERA.
11. Fensham, PJ. (1998). The politics of legitimating and marginalizing companion meanings: Three Australian case stories. Dans D.A. Roberts et L. Östman (Dirs.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum (pp. 178-192). New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Fensham, P., Harlen, W. (1999). School science and public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 755-763.
13. Galbraith, P.L., Carss, M.C., Grice, R.D., Endean, L., Wariy, M. (1997). Towards scientific literacy for the third millennium: A view from Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 447-468.
14. Gaskell, P.J. (1994). Assessing STS literacy: What is rational? Dans K. Boersma, K. Kortland et J. van Trommel (Dirs.), 7th IOSTE Symposium, Papers Part 1 (pp. 309-320). Endrecht (Pays-Bas): IOSTE Conference Committee.
15. Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
16. Hart, C. (1995). The story of a curriculum document for school physics. Thèse de doctorat inédit, Monash University, Clayton (Australie).
17. Irwin, A., Wynne, B., Dirs, D., (1996). Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Jenkins, E.W. (1995). Central policy and teacher response? Scientific investigation in the National Curriculum of England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 17,471-480.
19. Jenkins, E.W. (1997). Scientific and technological literacy for citizenship: What can we learn from the research and other evidence? Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education.
20. Kolsto, S.D. (2001). Science education for citizenship: Thoughtful decision making about science related social issues. Oslo: Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo.
21. Law, N., Fensham, P.J., Li, S., Bing, W. (2000). Public understanding of science as basic literacy. Melbourne Studies in Education, 41, 145-156.
22. Layton, D., Jenkins, E., Macgill, S., Davey, A. (1993). Inarticulate Science? Perspectives on the public understanding ofscience and some implications for science education. Driffield (R-U): Studies in Science Education.
23. Malcolm, C., Cole, J., Hogendoom, B., O’Keefe, D., Reid, I. (1987). The science framework, P-10. Melbourne (Australie): Ministry of Education.
24. Millar, R. (1996). Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77, 7-18.
25. Millar, R., Osborne, J., Dirs, D., (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. Londres: School of Education, King’s College London.
26. National Academy of Science [NAS]. (1996). National science education standards. Washington (DC): Auteur.
27. National Science Foundation [NSF], (1983). Educating Americansfor the twenty-first century: Report of the National Science Board Commission on pre-college education in mathematics, science and technology. Washington (DC): Auteur.
28. National Curriculum Council [NCC]. (1989). Science: Non-statutory guidance. Londres: Auteur.
29. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (1996). Literacy, economy and society: Results of the first international adult literacy survey. Paris: Auteur.
30. OECD/Programme for International Student Assessment [PISA]. (2000). Measuring student knowledge and skills: The PISA 2000 assessment of reading, mathematical and scientific literacy. Paris: Auteurs.
31. Orpwood, G., Garden, R.A. (1998). Assessing mathematics and science literacy. Monographie TIMSS N° 4. Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.
32. Osborne, J., Simon, S. (1996). Primary science: Past and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 27,99-147.
33. Pfundt, H., Duit, R. (1994). Bibliography: Students' alternative frameworks and science education (4' éd.). Kiel (Allemagne): I.P.N.
34. Roberts, D.A. (1982). Developing the concept of‘curriculum emphases’ in science education. Science Education, 66,243-260.
35. Roberts, D.A. (1983). Scientific literacy: Towards balance in setting goals for school science programs. Toronto: Guidance Centre, Université de Toronto.
36. Royal Society (1985). The public understanding of science. Londres: Auteur.
37. Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers University Press.
38. Solomon, J. (1997). School science and the future of scientific culture. Dans R.T. Levinson et J. Thomas (Eds.), Science today. Problem or crisis? (pp. 151-162). Londres: Routledge.
39. Solomon, J., Aikenhead, G. (Eds.). (1994). STS education: International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
40. UNESCO (1983). Science for all. Bangkok: UNESCO Office for Education in Asia and the Pacific.
41. Wellington, J. (2001). What is science education for? Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1, 23-38.