Reviewing the handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators

Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 355-360

  Hewitt, Jim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011436992     PISSN: 14926156     EISSN: 19424051     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14926150802506274     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bull, G., Knezek, G., Roblyer, G., Schrum, M., & Thompson, A. (2005). A proactive approach to a research agenda for educational technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,37(3), 217-220.
2. Gibson, S., & Oberg, D. (2004). Visions and realities of internet use in schools: Canadian perspectives. British Journal of Educational Technology,35, 569-585.
3. Houseman, J. (1997). Infusion not diffusion, a strategy for incorporating information technology into higher education. Journal of Distance Learning,12(1), 1-11.
4. Laferriere, T. (1999). Benefits of using information and communication technologies (ICT) for teaching and learning in K-12/13 classroom. Ottawa: School Net Advisory Board Working Document.
5. Lagrange, J., Artigue, M., Laborde, C., & Trouche, L. (2001). A meta-study on IC technologies in education: Towards a multidimensional framework to tackle their integration.Paper presented at the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Utrecht), 1,111-125.
6. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
7. OECD. (2004). Completing the FoundationforLifelong Learning: An OECD survey ofupper secondary schools. Retrieved September 15, 2007, from http://www.oecd.org/document/1/0,3343, en_2649_34515_27443329_1_1_1_1,00.html
8. Pollard, C., & Pollard, R. (2004-2005). Research priorities in educational technology: A Delphi study. Journal ofResearch on Technology in Education, 36(1), 60-71.
9. Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169.
10. Roblyer, M., & Knezek, G. (2003). New millennium research for educational technology: A call for a national research agenda. Journal ofResearch on Technology in Education,36(1), 60-71.
11. Schrum, L. (1999). Technology professional development for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 83-90.
12. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of thenew reform. HarvardEducationalReview,57(1), 1-22.
13. Strudler, N. (2003). Answering the call: A response to Roblyer and Knezek. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,36(1), 72-76.
14. Strudler, N., & Wetzel, K. (1999). Lessons from exemplary colleges of education: Factors affecting technology integration in preservice programs. Educational Technology Research and Development,47(4), 63-81.
15. Topp, N. W., Mortensen, R. & Grandgenett, N. (1995). Buildingatechnology-using facility to facilitate technology-using teachers. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education,11(3), 11-14.
16. U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Toward a new golden age in American education: How the Internet, the law and today’s students are revolutionizing expectations.Washington, DC: Author.
17. Watson, D. (2001). Pedagogy before technology: Re-thinking the relationship between ICT and teaching. Education and Information Technologies,6, 251-266.