Answering the call: A response to Roblyer and Knezek

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 72-76

  Strudler, Neal ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007788651     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2003.10782404     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computer survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Available: www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/ccsso.pdf
2. Berliner, D. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18-20.
3. Dodge, B. J. (2003, March). Motivational aspects ofWebQuests. Paper presented at the conference of the Society for Technology and Teacher Education, Albuquerque, NM. pp. 1737-1739.
4. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing change: Pattern, principles, and potholes. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5. Kay, A. (2003, June). How children will finally invent personal computing. Presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, Seattle, WA.
6. Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7-19.
7. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
8. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
9. Roblyer, M. D., & Knezek, G. (2003). New millennium research for educational technology: A call for a national research agenda. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 60-71.