Using data to inform decisions: Intrusive faculty advising at a community college

Community College Journal of Research and Practice

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 813-831

  Smith, Joshua S ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011436225     PISSN: 10668926     EISSN: 15210413     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10668920701375918     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abelman, R. & Molina, A. (2001). Style over substance revisited: A longitudinal analysis of intrusive intervention. NACADA Journal, 21(1&2), 32-45.
2. Adelman, C. (2002). The relationship between urbanicity and educational outcomes. In W. G. Tierney & L. S. Hagedorn (Eds.), Increasing access to college: Extending possibilities for all students (pp. 35-46). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
3. Arbuckle, J. & Gale, D. (1996). A comparison of the psychosocial developmental levels of traditional freshman and nonfreshman students: Are they really different? NACADA Journal, 16, 21-27.
4. Bowl, M. (2001). Experiencing the barriers: Non-traditional students entering higher education. Research Papers in Education, 16(2), 141-160.
5. Bamber, J. & Tett, L. (2003). Transforming the learning experiences of non-traditional students: A perspective from higher education. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(1), 57-75.
6. Claesson, M. A. & Brice, R. A. (1989). Teacher/mother: Effects of a dual role. American Educational Research Journal, 26(1), 1-23.
7. Derby, D. C. & Smith, T. (2004). An orientation course and community college retention. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 28(9), 763-773.
8. Donohue, T. & Wong, E. (1997). Achievement motivation and college satisfaction in traditional and nontraditional students. Education, 118(2), 237-243.
9. Garing, M. T. (1992). Intrusive academic advising. New Directions for Community Colleges, 21(2), 97-104.
10. Habley, W. R. (1983). Organizational structures for academic advising: Models and implications. Journal of College Student Personnel, 24(6), 21-29.
11. Harju, B. & Eppler, M. (1997). Achievement motivation, flow and irrational beliefs in traditional and nontraditional students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 24(3), 147-157.
12. Jeschke, M. P., Johnson, K. E., & Williams, J. R. (2001). A comparison of intrusive and prescriptive advising of psychology majors at an urban comprehensive university. NACADA Journal, 21(1&2), 46-58.
13. Justice E. & Dornan T. (2001). Metacognitive differences between traditional-age and nontraditional-age college students. Adult Education Quarterly, 51(3), 236-249.
14. Kim, K. (2002). ERIC Review: Exploring the meaning of ‘nontraditional’ at the community college. Community College Review, 30(1), 74-89.
15. Kinsella, S. (1998). A cross-discipline study of traditional and nontraditional college students. College Student Journal, 32(4), 532-538.
16. Laing, C. & Robinson, A. (2003). The withdrawal of nontraditional students: Developing an explanatory model. Journal of Further & Higher Education, 27(2), 175-185.
17. Leathwood, C. & O’Connell, P. (2003). “It’s a struggle”: the construction of the “new student” in higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 18(6), 597-615.
18. Leonard, M. (2002). An outreach framework for retaining nontraditional students at open-admissions institutions. Journal of College Counseling, 5(1), 60-73.
19. Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20. Lynch, J. & Bishop-Clark, C. (1998). A comparison of the nontraditional students’ experience on traditional versus nontraditional college campuses. Innovative Higher Education, 22(3), 217-229.
21. Mason, H. P. (1998). A persistence model for African American male urban community collegestudents. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 22(8), 751-761.
22. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Molina, A. & Abelman, R. (2000). Style over substance in interventions for at-risk students: The impact of intrusiveness. NACADA Journal, 20(2), 5-15.
24. National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Racial/ethnic differences in the path to a postsecondary credential. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences.
25. Pintrich, P. R., Roeser, R. W., & De Groot, E. A. M. (1994). Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents’ motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal for Early Adolescence, 14, 139-161.
26. Prohaska, V., Morrill, P., Atiles, I., & Perez, A. (2001). Academic procrastination by nontraditional students. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 16(1), 125-134.
27. Senter, M. S. & Senter, R. (1998). A comparative study of traditional and nontraditional student’s identities and needs. NASPA Journal, 35(4), 270-280.
28. Smith, J. S. (2005). The effects of student receptivity on college achievement and retention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 6(3), 273-288.
29. Smith, J. S., Dai, D. Y., & Szelest, B. P. (2006). Helping first-year students make the transition to college through advisor-researcher collaboration. NACADA Journal, 26(1), 67-76.
30. VanZile-Tamsen, C. & Livingston, J. A. (1999). The differential impact of motivation on self-regulated strategy use of high-and low-achieving college students. Journal of College Student Development, 40(1), 54-60.
31. Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 224-235.