Marker-trait association analysis for agronomic and compositional traits in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia)

Genetics and Molecular Research

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Kempf, K ^a   Malisch, C S ^a   Grieder, C ^a   Widmer, F ^a   Kolliker R ^a,b  

^a AGROSCOPE RECKENHOLZ TÄNIKON RESEARCH STATION ART   (Switzerland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Marker trait associations; Onobrychis viciifolia; Sainfoin; Sequence related amplified polymorphisms; Simple sequence repeats

Indexed keywords

GALLIC ACID; KAEMPFEROL; MYRICETIN; QUERCETIN; QUINIC ACID; GENETIC MARKER;

AGRONOMIC TRAIT; ALLELE; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC TRAIT; GENOTYPE; LEGUME; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; ONOBRYCHIS VICIIFOLIA; PHENOTYPE; PHYTOCHEMISTRY; PLANT GENETICS; PLANT HEIGHT; PLANT PARAMETERS; PLANT VIGOR; POPULATION GENETICS; SEED YIELD; SIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEAT; ULTRA PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; AGRICULTURE; FABACEAE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS;

AGRICULTURE; FABACEAE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENETIC MARKERS; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 85011021498     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16765680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4238/gmr16019483     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A and van Duijn CM (2007). GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics 23: 1294-1296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm108
2. Azuhnwi BN, Boller B, Martens M, Dohme-Meier F, et al. (2011). Morphology, tannin concentration and forage value of 15 swiss accessions of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) as influenced by harvest time and cultivation site. Grass Forage Sci. 66: 474-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00811.x
3. Azuhnwi BN, Thomann B, Arrigo Y, Boller B, et al. (2012). Ruminal dry matter and crude protein degradation kinetics of five sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop) accessions differing in condensed tannin content and obtained from different harvests. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 177: 135-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.08.004
4. Barrau E, Fabre N, Fouraste I and Hoste H (2005). Effect of bioactive compounds from Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) on the in vitro larval migration of Haemonchus contortus: role of tannins and flavonol glycosides. Parasitology 131: 531-538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182005008024
5. Barrett B, Baird I and Woodfield D (2009). White clover seed yield: a case study in marker-assisted selection. In: Molecular Breeding of Forage and Turf, (Yamada T and Spangenberg G, eds.), Springer Science Business Media, New York.
6. Castelli F, Contillo R and Miceli F (1996). Non-destructive determination of leaf chlorophyll content in four crop species. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 177: 275-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.1996.tb00246.x
7. Chen W-M and Abecasis GR (2007). Family-based association tests for genomewide association scans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81: 913-926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/521580
8. Collard BCY, Jahufer MZZ, Brouwer JB and Pang ECK (2005). An introduction to markers, quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping and marker-assisted selection for crop improvement: The basic concepts. Euphytica 142: 169-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-1681-5
9. Doyle CJ, Thomson DJ and Sheehy JE (1984). The future of sainfoin in British agriculture: an economic assessment. Grass Forage Sci. 39: 43-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1984.tb01663.x
10. Eding H and Meuwissen THE (2001). Marker-based estimates of between and within population kinships for the conservation of genetic diversity. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 118: 141-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0388.2001.00290.x
11. Engström MT, Pälijärvi M, Fryganas C, Grabber JH, et al. (2014). Rapid qualitative and quantitative analyses of proanthocyanidin oligomers and polymers by UPLC-MS/MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 62: 3390-3399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf500745y
12. Faville M, Barrett B, Griffiths A, Schreiber M, et al. (2003). Implementing molecular marker technology in forage improvement. Proc. New Zeal. Grassl. Assoc. 65: 229-238.
13. Goplen BP, Richards KW and Moyer JR (1991). Sainfoin for western Canada. Agriculture Canada Publication 1470/E.
14. Herrmann D, Boller B, Studer B, Widmer F, et al. (2006). QTL analysis of seed yield components in red clover (Trifolium pratense L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 112: 536-545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-0158-1
15. Hill SN (1980). An Evaluation of factors influenced by nitrogen fixation in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.). Montana State University, Bozeman.
16. Hoste H, Martinez-Ortiz-De-Montellano C, Manolaraki F, Brunet S, et al. (2012). Direct and indirect effects of bioactive tannin-rich tropical and temperate legumes against nematode infections. Vet. Parasitol. 186: 18-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.11.042
17. Humphreys MO (2000). Breeding methods for forage and amenity grasses. In: Molecular breeding of forage crops. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium, Molecular Breeding of Forage Crops, Hamilton and Lorne (Spangenberg G, eds.).
18. Humphreys MO (2005). Genetic improvement of forage crops - past, present and future. J. Agric. Sci. 143: 441-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859605005599
19. Kempf K, Grieder C, Walter A, Widmer F, et al. (2015). Evidence and consequences of self-fertilisation in the predominantly outbreeding forage legume Onobrychis viciifolia. BMC Genet. 16: 117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12863-015-0275-z
20. Kempf K, Mora-Ortiz M, Smith LMJ, Kölliker R, et al. (2016). Characterization of novel SSR markers in diverse sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) germplasm. BMC Genet. 17: 124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12863-016-0431-0
21. Lee M, Godshalk EB, Lamkey KR and Woodman WW (1989). Association of restriction fragment length polymorphisms among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses. Cell Biol. Mol. Genet. 29: 1067-1071.
22. Li G and Quiros CF (2001). Sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP), a new marker system based on a simple PCR reaction: its application to mapping and gene tagging in Brassica. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 455-461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001220100570
23. Mackay TFC (2001). The genetic architecture of quantitative traits. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35: 303-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.090633
24. Malisch CS, Lüscher A, Baert N, Engström MT, et al. (2015). Large variability of proanthocyanidin content and composition in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia). J. Agric. Food Chem. 63: 10234-10242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b04946
25. McCord P, Gordon V, Saha G, Hellinga J, et al. (2014). Detection of QTL for forage yield, lodging resistance and spring vigor traits in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Euphytica 200: 269-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1160-y
26. McMahon LR, McAllister TA, Berg BP, Majak W, et al. (2000). A review of the effects of forage condensed tannins on ruminal fermentation and bloat in grazing cattle. Can. J. Plant Sci. 80: 469-485. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/P99-050
27. Mechineni A, Kommuru DS, Gujja S, Mosjidis JA, et al. (2014). Effect of fall-grazed sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata) on gastrointestinal nematode infections of growing goats. Vet. Parasitol. 204: 221-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.06.002
28. Mora-Ortiz M, Swain MT, Vickers MJ, Hegarty MJ, et al. (2016). De-novo transcriptome assembly for gene identification, analysis, annotation, and molecular marker discovery in Onobrychis viciifolia. BMC Genomics 17: 756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3083-6
29. Nowosad K, Liersch A, Poplawska W and Bocianowski J (2016). Genotype by environment interaction for seed yield in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model. Euphytica 208: 187-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1620-z
30. Posselt UK (2010). Breeding Methods in Cross-Pollinated Species. In: Fodder Crops and Amenity Grasses, (Boller B, Posselt UK and Veronesi F, eds.). Springer Verlag, New York.
31. R Development Core Team (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Software. Available [http://www.R-project.org]. Accessed October 2, 2016.
32. Robins JG, Bauchan GR and Brummer EC (2007). Genetic mapping forage yield, plant height, and regrowth at multiple harvests in tetraploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Crop Sci. 47: 11-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.07.0447
33. Sears ER (1976). Genetic control of chromosome pairing in wheat. Annu. Rev. Genet. 10: 31-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ge.10.120176.000335
34. Serba DD, Daverdin G, Bouton JH, Devos KM, et al. (2015). Quantitative trait loci (QTL) underlying biomass yield and plant height in switchgrass. Bioenerg. Res. 8: 307-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9523-8
35. Studer B, Jensen LB, Hentrup S, Brazauskas G, et al. (2008). Genetic characterisation of seed yield and fertility traits in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 117: 781-791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-008-0819-y
36. Thill J, Regos I, Farag MA, Ahmad AF, et al. (2012). Polyphenol metabolism provides a screening tool for beneficial effects of Onobrychis viciifolia (sainfoin). Phytochemistry 82: 67-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.05.030
37. Wright S (1978). Variability within and among natural populations. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.