Challenges and solutions

Journal of Decision Systems

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 375-398

  Schoop, Mareike ^a   Köhne, Frank ^a   Staskiewicz, Dirk ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Communication theory; Decision theory; Negotiation support systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011017374     PISSN: 12460125     EISSN: 21167052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3166/jds.13.375-398     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O., May 2001. “ The Semantic Web ”. In Scientific American May
2. Bichler, M., Kersten, G., and Strecker, S., 2003. Towards a Structured Design of Electronic Negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12:311–335.
3. Clark, H. H., and Brennan, S. E., 1991. “ Grounding in Communication ”. In Perspectives on socially shared cognition, Edited by:Resnick, Levine and Teasley. 127–149. Washington:APA Books.
4. Clyman, D., and Tripp, T., 2000. Discrepant Values and Measures of Negotiator Performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 9:251–274.
5. Daft, R. L., and Lengel, R. H., 1986. A proposed integration among organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32:554–571.
6. Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., and Trevino, L. K., 1987. Message equivocality, media selection and manager performance:Implications for Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 11:355–366.
7. Delaney, M. M., Foroughi, A., and Perkins, W. C., 1997. An empirical study of the efficacy of a computerized negotiation support system (NSS). Decision Support Systems, 20:185–197.
8. Dennis, A. R., and Kinney, S., 1998. Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media:the Effect of Cues, Feedback and Task Equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9 (3):256–274.
9. Dennis, A. R., and Valacich, J. S., Rethinking Media Richness:Towards a Theory of Media Synchronicity. Proceedings of the 32nd HICCS.
10. DeSanctis, G., and Pool, M. S., Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use:Adaptive Structuration Theory. Organization Science, 5 (2) 121–147.
11. Fortgang, R. S., Lax, D. A., and Sebenius, L. K., 2003. Negotiating the Spirit of the Deal. Harvard Business Review, 81 (2):66–75.
12. Foroughi, A., 1998. Minimizing Negotiation Process Losses with Computerized Negotiation Support Systems. Journal of Applied Business Research, 14 (4):15–26.
13. Goh, K.-Y., Teo, H.-H., Wu, H., and Kwok-Kee, W., 2000. Computer-supported negotiations:an experimental study of bargaining in electronic commerce. Proceedings of ICIS. 2000, Brisbane, Australia.
14. Gulliver, P. H., 1979. Disputes and Negotiations:Across-Cultural Perspective, New York:Academic Press.
15. Habermas, J., 1981. “ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns ”. In Suhrkamp
16. Huber, G. P., and Lewis, K., 2004. Cross Understanding in Decision Groups:Analysis and Support. Proceedings of the DSS-2004 Conference. 2004, Prato, Italy. http://dsslab.sims.monash.edu.au/dss2004/proceedings/pdf/37_Huber_Lewis.pdf
17. Jelassi, M. T., and Foroughi, A., 1989. Negotiation Support Systems:An Overview of Design Issues and Existing Software. Decision Support Systems, 5:167–181.
18. Keeney, Ralph and Raiffa. 1976. Howard Decisions with Multiple Objectives:Preferences and Value Tradeoffs
19. Kersten, G., Michalowski, W., Szpankowicz, S., and Koperczak, Z., 1991. Restructurable Representations of Negotiation. Management Science, 37 (10):1269–1290.
20. Kersten, G. E., and Cray, D., 1997. Perspectives on Representation and Analysis of Negotiation:Towards Cognitive Support Systems Research Reportinterneg.org /interneg/research/papers/1997/01.pdf
21. Kersten, G. E., and Mallory, G. R., Rational Inefficient Compromises in Negotiation Research Report INR04/98http://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/iasawp/ir98024.html
22. Kersten, G. E., and Noronha, S. J., 1999. WWW-based negotiation support:design, implementation and use. Decision Support Systems, 25:135–154.
23. Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H., 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives:Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
24. Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H., 1991. “ Structuring and Analyzing Values for Multiple-Issues Negotiations ”. In Negotiation Analysis, Edited by:Peyton Young, H., Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan Press.
25. LaRocco, J., 2004. Ambiguities in Labor Contracts. Dispute Resolution Journal, 59 (2):38–41.
26. McGrath, J. E., 1984. Groups:Interaction and Performance, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
27. McGrath, J. E., and Hollingshead, A. B., 1993. “ Putting the group back in group support systems:Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements ”. In Group Support Systems:New Perspectives, Edited by:Jessup and Valacich. New York:Macmillan.
28. Pruitt, D. G., 1981. Negotiation Behavior, New York:Academic Press. D. G
29. Raiffa, H., 1982. The Art and Science of Negotiation, Harvard University Press.
30. Raiffa, H., 1996. Lectures On Negotiation Analysis, Cambridge, Massachusetts:PON.
31. Robert, L. P., and Dennis, A. R., 2005. Paradox of Richness:A Cognitive Model of Media Choice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48 (1):10–21.
32. Schoop, M., 2001. An Introduction to the Language-Action Perspective. SIGGROUP Bulletin, 22 (2) August:3–8.
33. Schoop, M., 2002 a. Electronic Markets for Architects. The Architecture of Electronic Markets. Information Systems Frontiers, 4 (3):285–302.
34. Schoop, M., 2002 b. “ Business Communication in Electronic Commerce ”. In abilitation, RWTH Aachen.
35. Schoop, M., Jertila, A., and List, T., 2003. Negoisst:A Negotiation Support System for Electronic Business-to-Business Negotiations in E-Commerce. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 47 (3):371–401.
36. Searle, J. R., 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge University Press.
37. Short, J., Williams, E., and Christie, B., 1976. The Social Psychology of Telecommunication, London:Wiley.
38. Simon, H. A., 1960. The New Science of Management Decision, NJ:Prentice Hall.
39. Smoliar, S. W., and Sprague, R., 2003. Technology Support for Communication and Understanding. Journal of Decision Systems, 12:123–139.
40. Taylor, J. R., and van Every, E. J., 2000. The Emergent Organization, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
41. Teich, J., Korhonen, P., Wallenius, H., and Wallenius, J., 2000. Conducting Dyadic Multiple Issue Negotiation Experiments:Methodological Recommendations. Group Decision and Negotiation, 9:347–354.
42. Vetschera, R., 2004 a. Estimating Negotiator Performance Without Preference Information Research Report INR 03/04interneg.org/interneg/research/papers/2004/03.pdf
43. Vetschera, R., 2004 b. Preference structures and behavioural consistency in negotiations. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on MCDA. 2004 b, Canada.
44. Vetschera, R., Kersten, G. E., and Köszegi, S., 2001. Exploratory Analysis of Success Determinants of Web-based Negotiation Support Systems Research Report INR02/01http://interneg.org/interneg/research/papers/2001/02.pdf
45. Weig, H., Schoop, M., De Moor, A., and Dignum, F., 2003. B2B Negotiation Support:The Need for a Communication Perspective. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12:3–29.
46. Winograd, T., 1988. “ A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work ”. In Computer Supported Cooperative Work:A Book of Readings, Edited by:Greif, I., San Mateo:Morgen Kaufmann.
47. Yuan, Y., Rose, J. B., and Archer, N., 1998. A Web-Based Negotiation Support System. Electronic Markets, 8 (3):13–17.