Assessing adhesive remnant removal and enamel damage with ultraviolet light: An in-vitro study

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 151, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 292-296

  Ribeiro, Alexandre Antonio ^a   Almeida, Layene Figueiredo ^b   Martins, Lidia Parsekian ^b   Martins, Renato Parsekian ^b  

^a POTIGUAR UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TOOTH CEMENT;

DENTAL DEBONDING; ENAMEL; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; INJURIES; PATHOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; HUMANS; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

EID: 85010991405     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.040     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. 1 Eliades, T., Gioka, C., Heim, M., Eliades, G., Makou, M., Color stability of orthodontic adhesive resins. Angle Orthod 74 (2004), 391–393.
2. 2 Karamouzos, A., Athanasiou, A.E., Papadopoulos, M.A., Kolokithas, G., Tooth-color assessment after orthodontic treatment: a prospective clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138 (2010), 537.e1–537.e8 discussion, 537-9.
3. 3 Hu, W., Featherstone, J.D., Prevention of enamel demineralization: an in-vitro study using light-cured filled sealant. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128 (2005), 592–600.
4. 4 Benham, A.W., Campbell, P.M., Buschang, P.H., Effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants in reducing white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment. A pilot study. Angle Orthod 79 (2009), 338–345.
5. 5 Zachrisson, B.U., Arthun, J., Enamel surface appearance after various debonding techniques. Am J Orthod 75 (1979), 121–127.
6. 6 Pont, H.B., Ozcan, M., Bagis, B., Ren, Y., Loss of surface enamel after bracket debonding: an in-vivo and ex-vivo evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138 (2010), 387.e1–387.e9 discussion, 387-9.
7. 7 Ozer, T., Basaran, G., Kama, J.D., Surface roughness of the restored enamel after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137 (2010), 368–374.
8. 8 Hosein, I., Sherriff, M., Ireland, A.J., Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126 (2004), 717–724.
9. 9 Ireland, A.J., Hosein, I., Sherriff, M., Enamel loss at bond-up, debond and clean-up following the use of a conventional light-cured composite and a resin-modified glass polyalkenoate cement. Eur J Orthod 27 (2005), 413–419.
10. 10 Ogaard, B., Fjeld, M., The enamel surface and bonding in orthodontics. Semin Orthod 16 (2010), 37–48.
11. 11 Al Shamsi, A.H., Cunningham, J.L., Lamey, P.J., Lynch, E., Three-dimensional measurement of residual adhesive and enamel loss on teeth after debonding of orthodontic brackets: an in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131 (2007), 301.e9–301.e15.
12. 12 Carvalho, P.E., dos Santos, V.M., Isber, H., Cotrim-Ferreira, F.A., Halogen light versus LED for bracket bonding: shear bond strength. Dental Press J Orthod 18 (2013), 31.e1–31.e6.
13. 13 Schuler, F.S., van Waes, H., SEM-evaluation of enamel surfaces after removal of fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Dent 16 (2003), 390–394.
14. 14 Tani, K., Watari, F., Uo, M., Morita, M., Discrimination between composite resin and teeth using fluorescence properties. Dent Mater J 22 (2003), 569–580.
15. 15 Bush, M.A., Hermanson, A.S., Yetto, R.J., Wieczkowski, G. Jr., The use of ultraviolet LED illumination for composite resin removal: an in vitro study. Gen Dent 58 (2010), e214–e218.
16. 16 Panzeri, H., Fernandes, L.T., Minelli, C.J., Spectral fluorescence of direct anterior restorative materials. Aust Dent J 22 (1977), 458–461.
17. 17 Lee, Y.K., Lu, H., Powers, J.M., Fluorescence of layered resin composites. J Esthetic Restor Dent 17 (2005), 93–100.
18. 18 Pretty, I.A., Hall, A.F., Smith, P.W., Edgar, W.M., Higham, S.M., The intra- and inter-examiner reliability of quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) analyses. Br Dent J 193 (2002), 105–109.
19. 19 Abdallah, M.N., Light, N., Amin, W.M., Retrouvey, J.M., Cerruti, M., Tamimi, F., Development of a composite resin disclosing agent based on the understanding of tooth staining mechanisms. J Dent 42 (2014), 697–708.
20. 20 Rachala, M.R., Kishore, M.S., Vamsilatha, K., Staining adhesive remnants for easy removal. J Clin Orthod, 47, 2013, 672.
21. 21 Campbell, P.M., Enamel surfaces after orthodontic bracket debonding. Angle Orthod 65 (1995), 103–110.
22. 22 Izadi, M.I., Sherriff, M., Cobourne, M.T., A comparative investigation into relative bond strengths of Damon3, Damon3MX, and APC II brackets using different primer and adhesive combinations. Eur J Orthod 34 (2012), 778–782.
23. 23 Reicheneder, C.A., Gedrange, T., Lange, A., Baumert, U., Proff, P., Shear and tensile bond strength comparison of various contemporary orthodontic adhesive systems: an in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135 (2009), 422.e1–422.e6 discussion, 422-3.
24. 24 Lowder, P.D., Foley, T., Banting, D.W., Bond strength of 4 orthodontic adhesives used with a caries-protective resin sealant. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134 (2008), 291–295.
25. 25 Alkis, H., Turkkahraman, H., Adanir, N., Microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems. Eur J Dent 9 (2015), 117–121.