Enamel loss at bond-up, debond and clean-up following the use of a conventional light-cured composite and a resin-modified glass polyalkenoate cement

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 413-419

  Ireland, A J ^a   Hosein, I ^a   Sherriff, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ALUMINUM SILICATE; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; FUJI ORTHO LC; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TRANSBOND;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL ETCHING; ENAMEL; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ALUMINUM SILICATES; BICUSPID; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL ETCHING; HUMANS; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 26644442588     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cji031     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Årtun J, Bergland S 1984 Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid etch enamel pretreatment. American Journal of Orthodontics 85: 333-340
2. Ashcraft D B, Staley R N, Jakobsen J R 1997 Fluoride release and shear bond strengths of three light-cured glass ionomer cements. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 111: 260-265
3. Barry G R P 1995 A clinical investigation of the effects of omission of pumice prophylaxis on band and bond failure. British Journal of Orthodontics 22: 245-248
4. Benington P C, Gillgrass T J, Foye R H, Millett D T, Gilmour W H 2001 Daily exposure to fluoride mouthrinse produces sustained fluoride release from orthodontic adhesives in vitro. Journal of Dentistry 29: 23-29
5. Bland J M, Altman D G 1986 Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1: 307-310
6. Choo S C, Ireland A J, Sherriff M 2001a An in vitro investigation into the use of resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cements as orthodontic bonding agents. European Journal of Orthodontics 23: 243-252
7. Choo S C, Ireland A J, Sherriff M 2001b An in vivo investigation into the use of resin-modified glass poly(alkenote) cements as orthodontic bonding agents. European Journal of Orthodontics 23: 403-409
8. David V A, Staley R N, Bigelow H F, Jakobsen J R 2002 Remnant amount and cleanup for 3 adhesives after debracketing. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 121: 291-296
9. Diedrich P 1981 Enamel alterations from bracket bonding and debonding: a study with the scanning electron microscope. American Journal of Orthodontics 79: 500-523
10. Fitzpatrick D A, Way D C 1977 The effects of wear, acid etchings, and bond removal on human enamel. American Journal of Orthodontics 72: 671-680
11. Ireland A J, Sherriff M 2002 The effect of pumicing on the in vivo use of a resin modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement and a conventional no-mix composite for bonding orthodontic brackets. Journal of Orthodontics 29: 217-220
12. Krell K V, Courey J M, Bishara S E 1993 Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 103: 258-266
13. Lin LI 1989 A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45: 255-268
14. McNeill C J, Wiltshire W A, Dawes C, Lavelle C L 2001 Fluoride release from new light-cured orthodontic bonding agents. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 120: 392-397
15. Newson R 2003 Multiple-test procedures and smile plots. Stata Journal 3: 109-132
16. Pus M D, Way D C 1980 Enamel loss due to orthodontic bonding with filled and unfilled resins using various clean-up techniques. American Journal of Orthodontics 77: 269-283
17. Read M J, Ferguson J W, Watts D C 1986 Direct bonding: crystal growth as an alternative to acid-etching? European Journal of Orthodontics 8: 118-122
18. Rix D, Foley T F, Mamandras A 2001 Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 119: 36-42
19. Shammaa I, Ngan P, Kim H, Kao E, Gladwin M, Gunel E, Brown C 1999 Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study. Angle Orthodontist 69: 463-469
20. Silverman E, Cohen M, Demke R S, Silverman M 1995 A new light-cured glass ionomer cement that bonds brackets to teeth without etching in the presence of saliva. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 108: 231-236
21. Silverstone L M 1974 Fissure sealants. Laboratory studies. Caries Research 8: 8-26
22. Smith D C, Cartz L 1974 Crystalline interface formed by polyacrylic acid and tooth enamel. Journal of Dental Research 52: 1155
23. Thompson R E, Way D C 1981 Enamel loss due to prophylaxis and multiple bonding/debonding of orthodontic attachments. American Journal of Orthodontics 79: 282-295
24. Underwood M L, Rawls H R, Zimmerman B F 1989 Clinical evaluation of a fluoride-exchanging resin as an orthodontic adhesive. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 96: 93-99