Idea generation, creativity, and prototypicality

Marketing Science

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 1-20

  Toubia, Olivier ^a   Netzer, Oded ^a  

^a Columbia Business School ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Creativity; Data mining; Idea generation; Innovation; Text mining

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010894617     PISSN: 07322399     EISSN: 1526548X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2016.0994     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anderson JR (1983) A spreading activation theory of memory. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 22(3):261–295.
2. Attali Y, Burstein J (2006) Automated essay scoring with e-rater v.2. J. Tech., Learn., Assessment;4(3).
3. Barrat A, Barthélemy M, Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2004) The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101(11):3747–3752.
4. Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. 3:993–1022.
5. Burroughs JE, Moreau CP, Mick DG (2008) Toward a psychology of consumer creativity. Haugtvegt CP, Herr PM, Kardes FR, eds. Handbook of Consumer Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum, New York), 1011–1038.
6. Callon M, Law J, Rip A (1986) Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World (Macmillan Press, Basingstoke, UK). Collins AM, Loftus EF (1975) A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psych. Rev. 82(6):407–428.
7. Dahl DW, Moreau P (2002) The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. J. Marketing Res. 39(1): 47–60.
8. De Bono E (1992) Serious Creativity (HarperCollins, New York).
9. Eliashberg J, Hui SK, Zhang ZJ (2007) From story line to box office: A new approach for green-lighting movie scripts. Management Sci. 53(6):881–893.
10. Feinerer I, Hornik K, Meyer D (2008) Text mining infrastructure in R. J. Statist. Software 25(5):1–54.
11. Feldman R, Sanger J (2007) The Text Mining Handbook (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).
12. Feldman R, Fresko M, Kinar Y, Lindell Y, Liphstat O, Rajman M, Schler Y, Zamir O (1998) Text mining at the term level. Proc. Second Eur. Sympos. Principles Data Mining Knowledge Discovery (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg), 65–73.
13. Finke RA, Ward TB, Smith SM (1992) Creative Cognition (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
14. Giora R (2003) On Our Mind: Salience, Context and Figurative Language (Oxford University Press, New York).
15. Goldenberg J, Mazursky D (2002) Creativity in Product Innovation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).
16. Grammer K, Thornhill R, (1994) Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and avera- geness. J. Comparative Psych. 108(3):233–242.
17. Halberstadt J, Rhodes G (2003) It’s not just average faces that are attractive: Computer-manipulated averageness makes birds, fish, and automobiles attractive. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 10(1):149–156.
18. Kornish L, Ulrich K (2011) Opportunity spaces in innovation: Empirical analysis of large samples of ideas. Management Sci. 57(1): 107–128.
19. Kostoff RN (2006) Systematic acceleration of radical discovery and innovation in science and technology. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change 73(8):923–936.
20. Landauer T, Laham D, Foltz P (2003) Automated essay assessment. Assessment Ed. Principles Policy Practice 10(3):295–308.
21. Landwehr JR, Labroo AA, Herrmann A (2011) Gut liking for the ordinary: Incorporating design fluency improves automobile sales forecasts. Marketing Sci. 30(3):416–429.
22. Langlois JH, Roggman LA (1990) Attractive faces are only average. Psych. Sci. 1(2):115–121.
23. Luo L, Toubia O (2015) Improving online idea generation platforms and customizing the task structure based on consumers’ domain specific knowledge. J. Marketing 79(5):100–114.
24. Manning CD, Raghavan P, Schűtze H (2008) An Introduction to Information Retrieval (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).
25. Martindale C, Moore K, Borkum J (1990) Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for Berlyne’s psychobiological theory. Amer. J. Psych. 103(1):53–80.
26. Martindale C, Moore K, West A (1988) Relationship of preference judgments to typicality, novelty, and mere exposure. Empirical Stud. Arts 6(1):79–96.
27. Mednick SA (1962) The associative basis of the creative process. Psych. Rev. 69(3):220–232.
28. Moreau CP, Dahl DW (2005) Designing the solution: The impact of constraints on consumers’ creativity. J. Consumer Res. 32(1): 13–22.
29. Netzer O, Feldman R, Goldenberg J, Fresko M (2012) Mine your own business: Market-structure surveillance through text min- ing. Marketing Sci. 31(3):521–543.
30. Nijstad BA, Stroebe W (2006) How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 10(3):186–213.
31. Nijstad BA, Stroebe W, Lodewijkx HFM (2003) Production blocking and idea generation: Does blocking interfere with cognitive processes? J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 39(6):531–548.
32. Oestreicher-Singer G, Libai B, Sivan L, Carmi E, Yassin O (2013) The network value of products. J. Marketing 77(3):1–14.
33. Perkins DN (1981) The Mind’s Best Work (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA). Porter MF (1980) An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 14(3): 130–137.
34. Reber R, Schwarz N, Winkielman P (2004) Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 8(4):364–382.
35. Repp BH (1997) The aesthetic quality of a quantitatively average music performance: Two preliminary experiments. Music Perception 14(4):419–444.
36. Rothenberg A (2014) Flight from Wonder—An Investigation of Scientific Creativity (Oxford University Press, New York).
37. Salton G, McGill MJ (1983) Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval (McGraw-Hill, New York).
38. Simon R (2014) One week, 3,000 product ideas. Wall Street Journal (July 3), http://www.wsj.com/articles/one-week-3-000-product -ideas-1404332942.
39. Simonton DK (2003) Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product person, and process perspectives. Psych. Bull. 129(4):475–494.
40. Strzalko J, Kaszycka KA (1991) Physical attractiveness: Interpersonal and intrapersonal variability of assessments. Soc. Biol. 39: 170–176.
41. Surowiecki J (2005) The Wisdom of Crowds (Random House, New York).
42. Swanson DR (1988) Migraine and magnesium: Eleven neglected connections. Perspect. Biol. Medicine 31(4):526–557.
43. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW (1993) Human facial beauty. Human Nature 4(3):237–269.
44. Tirunillai S, Tellis GJ (2014) Mining marketing meaning from online chatter: Brand analysis of big data using latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Marketing Res. 51(4):463–479.
45. Toubia O, Florès L (2007) Adaptive idea screening using consumers. Marketing Sci. 26(3):342–360.
46. Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, Jones B (2013) Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342(6157):468–472.
47. Veryzer RW, Hutchinson JW (1998) The influence of unity and proto-typicality on aesthetic responses to new product designs. J. Consumer Res. 24(4):374–385.
48. Ward TB (1995) What’s old about new ideas? Smith SM, Ward TB, Fiske RA, eds. The Creative Cognition Approach (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 157–178.
49. Winkielman P, Halberstadt J, Fazendeiro T, Catty S (2006) Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psych. Sci. 17(9):799–806.