Follow the fear: A multi-sited approach to GM

Rural Society

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 211-224

  Campbell, Hugh ^a   Fitzgerald, Ruth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010543963     PISSN: 10371656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/rsj.11.3.211     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Almas, R. 1999. ‘Food trust, ethics and safety in risk society’. Sociological Research Online 4 (3). http://www.socresearchonline.org.uk/socresearchonline/4/3/almas, html
2. Ball, R. and J. Lilly. 1982. The menace of margarine: the rise and fall of a social problem’. Social Problems 29(5): 488-499.
3. Balsamo, A. 2000. Teaching in the Belly of the Beast: Feminism in the best of all places’. In J. Marchessault and K. Sawchuk (eds). Wild science reading feminism medicine and the media. London: Routledge 185-214.
4. Beardsworth, A. and T. Keil. 1997. Sociology on the menu: an invitation to the study of food and society. London: Routledge.
5. rd ed). London: Routledge.
6. Boisseau, P. 1994. ‘Irradiation and the food industry in France’. Food Technology 48(5): 138-140.
7. Buttel, F. 1996. Theoretical issues in global agri-food restructuring’. In D. Burch, R. Rickson, and G. Lawrence (eds).Globalisation and agrifood restructuring: perspectives from the Australasia reqion. Aldershot: Avebury: 17-44.
8. Clifford, J. 1986. ‘Introduction: partial truths’. In J. Clifford and G. Marcus (eds). Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press: 1-26.
9. Cook, A., J. Fairweather, and H. Campbell. 2000. New Zealand farmer and grower opinions on their use of genetic engineering technology, purchasing genetically modified food, and organic production. Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit Research Report No. 243. Lincoln University: Canterbury.
10. Cronon, W. (ed) 1995. Uncommon ground: toward reinventing nature. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
11. CSAFE. 2000. Strategic issues for GMOs in primary production: key economic drivers and emerging issues. CSAFE Discussion Paper No 1. Centre for the Study of Agriculture, Food and Environment: School of Social Sciences, University of Otago.
12. Denzin, N. 1994. “The art and politics of interpretation’, in N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications: 500-515.
13. Fischer, M. (2001). Ethnographic critique and technoscientific narratives: The Old Mole, ethical plateaux, and the governance of emergent biosocial politics, culture, medicine and psychiatry 25: 355-393.
14. Fitzgerald, R. and H. Campbell. 2001. ‘Food scares and GM: movement on the nature/culture faultline'. The Drawing Board: An Australian Journal of Public Affairs October, 2001. http://www.econ.usyd.edu.au/drawingboard
15. Gofton L. 1998. ‘British market-research data on food: a note on their use for the academic study of food choice’, in Murcott, A. (ed). The nation’s diet: the social science of food choice. Longman: London: 302-310.
16. Gofton, L. and E. Haimes. 1999. ‘Necessary evils? opening up closings in sociology and biotechnology’. Sociological Research Online 4 (3). http://www.socresearchonline.org.uk/socresearchonline/4/3/gofton.html
17. Green, J. 1995. ‘Accidents and the risk society: some problems with prevention’. In Bunton, R., S. Nettleton, and R. Burrows (eds). The sociology of health promotion: critical analyses of consumption, lifestyle and risk. Routledge: New York: 116-132.
18. Harvey, M. 1999. ‘Cultivation and comprehension: how genetic modification irreversibly alters the human engagement with nature’. Sociological Research Online 4 (3). http://www.socresearchonline.org.uk/socresearchonline1412,1harvey.html
19. Ho, M. and R. Steinbrecher. nd. Fatal flaws in food safety assessment: critique of the joint FAO/WHO biotechnology and food safety report. http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/fao-cn.htm
20. Hoban, T. 1995. 'The construction of food biotechnology as a social issue’, in D. Maurer and J. Sobal (eds). Eating Agendas: Food and Nutrition as Social Problems. Aldine de Grutyer: New York: 189-209.
21. Hoban, T. 1996. ‘How Japanese consumers view biotechnology’. Food Technology 50 (7): 85-88.
22. Hoban, T. 1997. ‘Consumer acceptance of biotechnology: an international perspective’. Nature Biotechnology 15: 232-234.
23. Hoban, T. 1999a. ‘Consumer acceptance of biotechnology in the United States and Japan’. Food Technology 53(5): 50-53. http://www4.ncsu.edu/-hobantj/Jap-US.htm
24. Hoban, T. 1999b. ‘Public perceptions and understanding of agricultural biotechnology, international information programs U.S. Department of State’. Economic Perspectives 4(4) October 1999. http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/ites/1099/ijee/bio-hoban.htm
25. Hoban, T. 2000. Consumer and food industry perspectives on food biotechnology. http://www.biotech-info.net/consumer_perspective.html
26. Hornig Priest, S. 1995. ‘Information equity, public understanding of science, and the biotechnology debate’. Journal of Communication 45(1): 39-54.
27. INRA (International Research Associates) (Europe) (2000) The Europeans and biotechnology -Eurobarometer 52.1. http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/research/pdf/eurobarometer-en.pdf
28. Kamaldeen, S. and D. Powell. 2000. Public perceptions of biotechnology. Food Safety Network Technical Report #17, Department of Plant Agriculture: University of Guelph, http://www.plant.uoguelph.ca/safefood/gmo/public-perceptions-biotech-aug00.htm
29. Lockie, S. and S. Kitto 2000. ‘Beyond the farmgate: production-consumption networks and agri-food research’. Sociologia Ruralis 40 (1):3-19.
30. Lupton, D. 1997. ‘Foucault and the médicalisation critique’, in A. Petersen and R. Bunton (eds). Foucault health and medicine. London: Routledge: 94-110.
31. Marcus, G. 1998. Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
32. Mintz, S. 1985. Sweetness and power. New York: Penguin Books.
33. Murcott, A. 1999. ‘Not science but PR:GM food and the makings of a considered sociology'. Sociological Research Online 4 (3). http://www.socresearchonline.org.uk/socresearchonline/4/3/murcott.html
34. Murcott, A. 2001. ‘Public beliefs about GM foods: more on the makings of a considered sociology’. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 15(1): 9-19.
35. Nerlich, B., D. Clarke, and R. Dingwall. 1999. ‘The influence of popular cultural imagery on public attitudes towards cloning’. Sociological Research Online 4 (3). http://www.socresearchonline.org.uk/socresearchonline/4/3/nerlich.html
36. Norton, J. 1998. ‘Throwing up concerns about novel foods’, in Hindmarsh, R., G. Lawrence, and J. Norton (eds). Altered genes -reconstructing nature: the debate. Allen and Unwin: Sydney: 173-185.
37. in the Age of Risk. St Leonards: Allen and Unwin.
38. Powell, D. 1998. Impacts of biotechnology, environment, food safety: communications. Paper presented to the Agriculture Risk Managment Conference, October 2829, 1998, Hull, QC. http://www.plant.uoguelph.ca/safefood/
39. Renn, O. 1992. ‘Concepts of risk: a classification’, in S. Krimsky and D. Golding (eds). Social Theories of Risk. Westport: Praeger: 53-79.
40. Shaw, A. 1999. “‘What are ‘they’ doing to our food?”: public concerns about food in the UK’. Sociological Research Online 4 (3). http://www.socresearchonline.org.uk/socresearchonline/4/3/shaw.html
41. Slovik, P. 1999. ‘Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield’. Risk Analysis 19 (4): 689-701.
42. Tannahill, R. 1988. Food in history. London: Penguin Books.
43. Ten Eyck, T. 1999. ‘Shaping a food safety debate: control efforts of newspaper reporters and sources in the food irradiation controversy’. Science Communication 20(4): 426-447.
44. Turney, J. 1998. Frankenstein’s footsteps: science, genetics and popular culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.
45. Wolf, E. 1982. Europe and the people without history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
46. Zechendorf, B. 1994. ‘What the public thinks about biotechnology: better than synthetic food but worse than organ transplantation: a survey of opinion polls’. Bio/Technology 12(9): 870-875.