An empirical evaluation of the SF-12, SF-6D, EQ-5D and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the hand

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Dritsaki, Melina ^a   Petrou, Stavros ^b   Williams, Mark ^c   Lamb, Sarah E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^c OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

EQ 5D; Health Economics; Measurement properties; Outcome assessment; Rheumatoid arthritis; SF 6D; SF12; Utility measures

Indexed keywords

ACCEPTIBILITY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; DISEASE ASSESSMENT; DISEASE SEVERITY; EQ 5D; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HAND FUNCTION; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; INTERPRETABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICHIGAN HAND OUTCOME QUESTIONNAIRE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPONSIVENESS; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SF 6D; SHORT FORM 12; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; AGED; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; DEVICES; EVALUATION STUDY; HEALTH STATUS; MICHIGAN; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STANDARDS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MICHIGAN; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 85010369445     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12955-016-0584-6     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. NJ C. Economic burden of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;39(1):28-33.
2. Yelin E, Wanke LA. W.L., An assessment of the annual and long-term direct costs of rheumatoid arthritis: the impact of poor function and functional decline. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(6):1209-18.
3. Society NRA. The economic burden of Rheumatoid Arthritis. 2010.
4. Longworth L, Singh J, Brazier J. An Evaluation of the Performance of Eq-5d: A Review of Reviews of Psychometric Properties. Value Health. 2014;17(7):A570.
5. Brazier JE, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care. 2004;42:851-9.
6. Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon JA, Tschuchiya, Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
7. Hurst NP, Kind P, Ruta D, Hunter M, Stubbings A. Measuring Health Related Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis: validity, responsiveness and reliability of EuroQol (EQ-5D). Rheumatology. 1997;36(5):551-9.
8. Gaujoux-Viala C, Fautrel B. F.B., Cost effectiveness of therapeutic interventions in ankylosing spondylitis: a critical and systematic review. PharmacoEconomics. 2012;30(12):1145-56.
9. Marra CA, Woolcott JC, Kopec JA, et al. A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1571-82.
10. Chung K, Pillsbury BS, Walters MR, Hayward RA, Arbor A. Reliability and Validity Testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg. 1998;23A(4):575-87.
11. Adams J, Mullee M, Burridge J, Hammond A, Cooper C. Responsiveness of self-report and therapist-rated upper extremity structural impairment and functional outcome measures in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62:274-8.
12. Marks M, Audigé L, Herren DB, Schindele S, Nelissen RG, Vliet Vlieland TP. Measurement properties of the German Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in patients with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66:245-52.
13. Lamb S, Williamson EM, Heine PJ, Adams J, et al. Exercises to improve function of the rheumatoid hand (SARAH): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:421-9.
14. Waljee JF, Chung KC, Kim HM, et al. Validity and responsiveness of the Michigan hand questionniare in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A multicentre, international study. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62:1569-77.
15. Klein RD, Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Open carpal tunnel release using a 1-centimeter incision: technique and outcomes for 104 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:1616-22.
16. Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30:81-6.
17. Chung KC, Kotsis SV, Kim HM. Predictors of functional outcomes after surgical treatment of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32:76-83.
18. Chung KC, Kotsis SV. Outcomes of multiple microvascular toe transfers for reconstruction in 2 patients with digitless hands: 2- and 4-year follow-up case reports. J Hand Surg Am. 2002;27(4):652-8.
19. Chung KC, Wei FC. An outcome study of thumb reconstruction using microvascular toe transfer. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25:651-8.
20. Goldfarb CA, Stern PJ. Metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. A long-term assessment. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2003;85(A):1869-78.
21. Massy-Westropp N, Krishnan J, Ahern M. Comparing the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, and Sequential Occupational Dexterity Assessment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:1996-2001.
22. Group TE. A facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;19(99):1999-2078.
23. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. The time trade-off method: results from a general population study. Health Econ. 1996;5(2):141-54.
24. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summaries: a user's manual. Boston: New England Medical Centre; 1995.
25. Parsons S, Carnes D, Pincus T, Foster N, Breen A, Vogel S, Underwood M, Measuring troublesomeness of chronic pain by location. BMC Musculoskel Disord. 2006;7(34). doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-34.
26. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737-45.
27. Brazier J, Deverill M. A checklist for judging preference-based measures of health related quality of life: learning from psychometrics. Health Econ. 1999;8(1):41-51.
28. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station: StataCorp LP; 2013.
29. Pink J, Petrou S, Williamson E, Williams M, Lamb SE, Properties of patient-reported outcome measures in individuals following acute whiplash injury. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12(38). doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-38.
30. Turner N, Campbell J, Peters T, Wiles N, Hollinghurst S. A comparison of four different approaches to measuring health utility in depressed patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11(1):81.
31. McDowell I. A guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
32. Walters SJ. Quality of life outcomes in clinical trials and health care evaluation: a practical guide to analysis and interpretation. Chichester: Wiley; 2009.
33. Streiner DL, Norman G. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publication; 2003.
34. De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
35. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemil. 2000;53:459-68.
36. Adams R, Walsh C, Veale D, Bresnihan B, FitzGerald O, Barry M. Understanding the relationship between the EQ-5D, SF-6D, HAQ and disease activity in inflammatory arthritis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28:477-87.
37. Kosinski M, Keller SD, Ware Jr JE, Hatoum HT, Kong SX. The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: relative validity of scales in relation to clinical measures of arthritis severity. Med Care. 1999;37(Suppl:MS):23-39.
38. Linde L, Sørensen J, Ostergaard M, Horslev-Petersen K, Merette LH. Health-Related Quality of Life: Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of SF-36, EQ-15D, EQ-5D, RAQoL, and HAQ in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2008;35(8):1528-37.
39. DiStefano C, Zhu M, Mîndrila D. Understanding and Using Factor Scores:Considerations for the Applied Researcher. Pract Asses Res Eval. 2009;14(20).
40. Harrison MJ, Lunt M, Verstappen SM, Watson KD, Bansback NJ, Symmons DP, Exploring the validity of estimating EQ-5D and SF-6D utility values from the health assessment questionnaire in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8(21). doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-21.