A comparison of four different approaches to measuring health utility in depressed patients.

Health and quality of life outcomes

Volumn 11, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Turner, Nicholas ^a   Campbell, John ^b   Peters, Tim J ^b   Wiles, Nicola ^b   Hollinghurst, Sandra ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; CLASSIFICATION; COGNITIVE THERAPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; DEVICES; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT; STANDARDS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; ANTIDEPRESSIVE AGENTS; COGNITIVE THERAPY; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF REPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84877110047     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-81     Document Type: Article

References (0)