A pilot validation study of crowdsourcing systematic reviews: Update of a searchable database of pediatric clinical trials of highdose Vitamin D

Translational Pediatrics

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 18-26

  Nama, Nassr ^a   Iliriani, Klevis ^b   Xia, Meng Yang ^a   Chen, Brian P ^a   Zhou, Linghong Linda ^a   Pojsupap, Supichaya ^c   Kappel, Coralea ^a   O'Hearn, Katie ^c   Sampson, Margaret ^c   Menon, Kusum ^a,c   McNally, James Dayre ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^c CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Citation screening; Crowdsourcing; Systematic reviews; Vitamin D

Indexed keywords

COLECALCIFEROL; ERGOCALCIFEROL; VITAMIN D;

ALGORITHM; CITATION ANALYSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CROWDSOURCING; DATA BASE; DRUG MEGADOSE; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PILOT STUDY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE DRUG DOSE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VALIDATION STUDY;

EID: 85010282384     PISSN: 22244336     EISSN: 22244344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21037/tp.2016.12.01     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Pearson A, Wiechula R, Court A, et al. The JBI model of evidence-based healthcare. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2005;3:207-15.
2. Shojania KG, Sampson M, Ansari MT, et al. How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:224-33.
3. Martin A, Saunders DH, Shenkin SD, et al. Lifestyle intervention for improving school achievement in overweight or obese children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(3):CD009728.
4. Fletcher-Watson S, McConnell F, Manola E, et al. Interventions based on the Theory of Mind cognitive model for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(3):CD008785.
5. Lavoie MC, Verbeek JH, Pahwa M. Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(3):CD009740.
6. Sampson M, Tetzlaff J, Urquhart C. Precision of healthcare systematic review searches in a cross-sectional sample. Res Synth Methods 2011;2:119-25.
7. Allen IE, Olkin I. Estimating time to conduct a meta-analysis from number of citations retrieved. JAMA 1999;282:634-5.
8. Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-fve trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000326.
9. Nama N, Menon K, Iliriani K, et al. A systematic review of pediatric clinical trials of high dose vitamin D. Peer J 2016;4:e1701.
10. Créquit P, Trinquart L, Yavchitz A, et al. Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer. BMC Med 2016;14:8.
11. Matwin S, Kouznetsov A, Inkpen D, et al. A new algorithm for reducing the workload of experts in performing systematic reviews. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:446-53.
12. Cohen AM, Hersh WR, Peterson K, et al. Reducing workload in systematic review preparation using automated citation classifcation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:206-19.
13. Jonnalagadda S, Petitti D. A new iterative method to reduce workload in systematic review process. Int J Comput Biol Drug Des 2013;6:5-17.
14. O'Mara-Eves A, Thomas J, McNaught J, et al. Using text mining for study identifcation in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches. Syst Rev 2015;4:5.
15. Thomas J, McNaught J, Ananiadou S. Applications of text mining within systematic reviews. Res Synth Methods 2011;2:1-14.
16. Leiter A, Sablinski T, Diefenbach M, et al. Use of crowdsourcing for cancer clinical trial development. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106. pii: dju258.
17. Good BM, Su AI. Games with a scientifc purpose. Genome Biol 2011;12:135.
18. Brown AW, Allison DB. Using Crowdsourcing to Evaluate Published Scientifc Literature: Methods and Example. PLoS One 9:e100647.
19. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097.
20. Sampson M, McGowan J, Cogo E, et al. An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:944-52.
21. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workfow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377-81.
22. Higgins JP, Green S. Front Matter, in Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK 2008.
23. Brown LD, Cai TT, DasGupta A. Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion. Statistical Science 2001;16:101-17.
24. McNally JD, O'Hearn K, Lawson ML, et al. Prevention of vitamin D defciency in children following cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015;16:402.
25. Hrynaszkiewicz I, Norton ML, Vickers AJ, et al. Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers. BMJ 2010;340:c181.
26. Cohen AM. Optimizing feature representation for automated systematic review work prioritization. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008:121-5.
27. Tsertsvadze A, Chen YF, Moher D, et al. How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously? Syst Rev 2015;4:160.
28. Elliott J, Sim I, Thomas J, et al. #CochraneTech: technology and the future of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(9):ED000091.
29. Elliott JH, Turner T, Clavisi O, et al. Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap. PLoS Med 2014;11:e1001603.
30. Badgett RG, Vindhyal M, Stirnaman JT, et al. A Living Systematic Review of Nebulized Hypertonic Saline for Acute Bronchiolitis in Infants. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169:788-9.