Identifying suitable multifunctional restoration areas for Forest Landscape Restoration in Central Chile

Ecosphere

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Schulz, Jennifer Jelena ^a,b   Schröder, Boris ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

^d BERLIN BRANDENBURG INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH BBIB   (Germany)

Author keywords

Carbon sequestration; Ecosystem functions; Erosion prevention; Forest Landscape Restoration; Forest regeneration; Habitat connectivity; Habitat suitability models; Historical forest patterns; Multifunctional synergies; Restoration planning; Spatial multi criteria evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009971790     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21508925     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.1644     Document Type: Article

References (162)

1. Adriaensen, F., J. P. Chardon, G. D. Blust, E. Swinnen, S. Villalba, H. Gulinck, and E. Matthysen. 2003. The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning 64:233-247.
2. Adriaensen, F., M. Githiru, J. Mwang'ombe, E. Matthysen, and L. Lens. 2007. Restoration and increase of connectivity among fragmented forest patches in the Taita Hills, Southeast Kenya. Part II Technical Report, CEPF Project 1095347968. University of Gent, Gent, Belgium.
3. Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory and the extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Pages 267-281 in B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki, editors. Second international symposium on information theory. Academia Kiado, Budapest, Hungary.
4. Allen, R. B., and J. B.Wilson. 1991. A method for determining indigenous vegetation from simple environmental factors, and its use for vegetation restoration. Biological Conservation 56:265-280.
5. Amigo, J., and C. Ramírez. 1998. A bioclimatic classification of Chile: woodland communities in the temperate zone. Plant Ecology 136:9-26.
6. Anselin, L. 2002. Under the hood. Issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricultural Economics 27:247-267.
7. Armesto, J. J., K. Arroyo, T. Mary, and L. F. Hinojosa. 2007. The Mediterranean environment of Central Chile. Pages 184-199 in T. T. Velben, K. R. Young, and A. R. Orme, editors. The physical geography of South America. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
8. Armesto, J. J., and J. A. Martiacute;nez. 1978. Relations between vegetation structure and slope aspect in the Mediterranean region of Central Chile. Journal of Ecology 66:881-889.
9. Aronson, J., and S. Alexander. 2013. Ecosystem restoration is now a global priority: time to roll up our sleeves. Restoration Ecology 21:293-296.
10. Aronson, J., A. Del Pozo, C. Ovalle, J. Avendaño, A. Lavin, and M. Etienne. 1998. Land use changes and conflicts in Central Chile. Pages 155-168 in P. W. Rundel, G. Montenegro, and F. Jaksic, editors. Landscape disturbance and biodiversity in Mediterraneantype ecosystems. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
11. Aronson, J., S. J. Milton, and J. N. Blignaut. 2007. Restoring natural capital: definition and rationale. Pages 3-8 in J. Aronson, S. J. Milton, and J. N. Blignaut, editors. Restoring natural capital: science, business, and practice. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
12. Arroyo, M. T. K., P. A. Marquet, C. Marticorena, J. A. Simonetti, L. A. Cavieres, F. A. Squeo, R. Rozzi, and F. Massardo. 2006. El hotspot chileno, prioridad mundial para la conservación. Pages 94-97 in Diversidad de ecosistemas, ecosistemas terrestres. Diversidad de Chile: patrimonios y desafiacute;os. Comisión Nacional del Medio Ambiente (Chile), Santiago de Chile, Chile.
13. Badano, E. I., L. A. Cavieres, M. A.Molina-Montenegro, and C. L. Quiroz. 2005. Slope aspect influences plant association patterns in the Mediterranean matorral of Central Chile. Journal of Arid Environments 62:93-108.
14. Bagstad, K. J., F. Villa, D. Batker, J. Harrison-Cox, B. Voigt, and G. W. Johnson. 2014. From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments. Ecology and Society 19:64.
15. Bailey, S. 2007. Increasing connectivity in fragmented landscapes: an investigation of evidence for biodiversity gain in woodlands. Forest Ecology and Management 238:7-23.
16. Bailey, N., J. T. Lee, and S. Thompson. 2006. Maximising the natural capital benefits of habitat creation: spatially targeting native woodland using GIS. Landscape and Urban Planning 75:227-243.
17. Balduzzi, A., R. Tomaselli, I. Serey, and R. Villaseñor. 1982. Degradation of the Mediterranean type of vegetation in Central Chile. Ecologia Mediterranea 7:223-240.
18. Beier, P., D. R. Majka, and W. D. Spencer. 2008. Forks in the road: choices in procedures for designing wildland linkages. Conservation Biology 22: 836-851.
19. Beinat, E. 1997. Value functions for environmental management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
20. Beven, K. J., and M. J. Kirkby. 1979. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin 24:43-69.
21. Binzenhöfer, B., B. Schröder, R. Biedermann, B. Strauss, and J. Settele. 2005. Habitat models and habitat connectivity analysis for butterflies and burnet moths-the example of Zygaena carniolica and Coenonympha arcania. Biological Conservation 126:247-259.
22. Birch, J. C., A. C. Newton, C. A. Aquino, E. Cantarello, C. Echeverría, T. Kitzberger, I. Schiappacasse, and N. T. Garavito. 2010. Cost-effectiveness of dryland forest restoration evaluated by spatial analysis of ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107:21925-21930.
23. Boedhihartono, A. K., and J. Sayer. 2012. Forest Landscape Restoration: Restoring what and for whom? Pages 309-323 in J. Stanturf, D. Lamb, and P. Madsen, editors. Forest Landscape Restoration: integrating natural and social sciences. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
24. Boitani, L., A. Falcucci, L. Maiorano, and C. Rondinini. 2007. Ecological networks as conceptual frameworks or operational tools in conservation. Conservation Biology 21:1414-1422.
25. Bolliger, J., M. Bättig, J. Gallati, A. Kläy, M. Stauffacher, and F. Kienast. 2011. Landscape multifunctionality: a powerful concept to identify effects of environmental change. Regional Environmental Change 11:203-206.
26. Bradshaw, A. D., and M. J. Chadwick. 1980. The restoration of land: the ecology and reclamation of derelict and degraded land. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
27. Brown, K. 2005. Addressing trade-offs in Forest Landscape Restoration. Pages 59-62 in S. Mansourian, D. Vallauri, and N. Dudley, editors in Cooperation with World Wide Fund for Nature International. Forest restoration in landscapes: beyond planting trees. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
28. Bullock, J. M., J. Aronson, A. C. Newton, R. F. Pywell, and J. M. Rey-Benayas. 2011. Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:541-549.
29. Burnside, N. G., R. F. Smith, and S. Waite. 2002. Habitat suitability modelling for calcareous grassland restoration on the South Downs, United Kingdom. Journal of Environmental Management 65:209-221.
30. Chan, K.M. A., M. R. Shaw, D. R. Cameron, E. C. Underwood, and G. C. Daily. 2006. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biology 4:e379.
31. Chazdon, R. L., P. H. S. Brancalion, D. Lamb, L. Laestadius, M. Calmon, and C. Kumar. 2015. A policydriven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conservation Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12220
32. Cimon-Morin, J., M. Darveau, and M. Poulin. 2013. Fostering synergies between ecosystem services and biodiversity in conservation planning: a review. Biological Conservation 166:144-154.
33. CONAMA [Comisión Nacional del Medio Ambiente]. 2002. Erodibildad de suelo; Erosividad del suelo. Sistema de Información Ambiental Geográfica, Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, Gobierno de Chile, Chile. http://www.sinia.cl/1292/w3-property value-15488.html
34. Costanza, R. 2008. Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed. Biological Conservation 141:350-352.
35. Crossman, N. D., and B. A. Bryan. 2009. Identifying cost-effective hotspots for restoring natural capital and enhancing landscape multifunctionality. Ecological Economics 68:654-668.
36. Crossman, N. D., et al. 2013. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 4:4-14.
37. Crow, T. 2012. What can landscape ecology contribute to Forest Landscape Restoration? Pages 25-38 in J. A. Stanturf, D. Lamb, and P. Madsen, editors. Forest Landscape Restoration: integrating natural and social sciences. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
38. DeFries, R. 2008. Terrestrial vegetation in the coupled human-earth system: contributions of remote sensing. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33:369-390.
39. DeFries, R. S., J. A. Foley, and G. P. Asner. 2004. Landuse choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:249-257.
40. de Groot, R., and L. Hein. 2007. Concept and valuation of landscape functions at different scales. Pages 15-36 in Ü. Mander, H. Wiggering, and K. Helming, editors. Multifunctional land use: meeting future demands for landscape goods and services. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
41. Dickson, B., M. Bertzky, T. Christophersen, C. Epple, V. Kapos, L. Miles, U. Narloch, and K. Trumper. 2013. REDD+ beyond carbon: supporting decisions on safeguards and multiple benefits. Policy Brief 02. UN-REDD Programme. http://www.unredd.net/index.php?option=com-docman&task=doc-down load&gid=8533&Itemid=53
42. Dormann, C. F., et al. 2007. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30:609-628.
43. Dormann, C. F., et al. 2013. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27-46.
44. Dudley, N., J. Morrison, J. Aronson, and S. Mansourian. 2005. Why do we need to consider restoration in a landscape context? Pages 51-58 in S. Mansourian, D. Vallauri, and N. Dudley, editors in Cooperation with World Wide Fund for Nature International. Forest restoration in landscapes: beyond planting trees. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
45. Egan, D., and E. A. Howell. 2001. The historical ecology handbook. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
46. Egoh, B., E. G. Drakou, M. B. Dunbar, J. Maes, and L. Willemen. 2012. Indicators for mapping ecosystem services: a review. Report EUR 25456 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
47. Egoh, B. N., B. Reyers, M. Rouget, and D. M. Richardson. 2011. Identifying priority areas for ecosystem service management in South African grasslands. Journal of Environmental Management 92:1642-1650.
48. Egoh, B., B. Reyers, M. Rouget, D. M. Richardson, D. L. Maitre, and A. van Jaarsveld. 2008. Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 127: 135-140.
49. Egoh, B., M. Rouget, B. Reyers, A. T. Knight, R. M. Cowling, A. van Jaarsveld, and A. Welz. 2007. Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. Ecological Economics 63:714-721.
50. Eigenbrod, F., B. J. Anderson, P. R. Armsworth, A. Heinemeyer, S. F. Jackson, M. Parnell, C. D. Thomas, and K. J. Gaston. 2009. Ecosystem service benefits of contrasting conservation strategies in a human-dominated region. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276:2903-2911.
51. ESRI. 2008. ArcMap (Version 9.3). Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc., Redlands, California, USA.
52. Felicísimo, A., E. Frances, J. M. Fernindez, A. Gonzalez-Diez, and J. Varas. 2002. Modeling the potential distribution of forests with a GIS. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 68:455-461.
53. Fisher, B., R. K. Turner, and P. Morling. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 68:643-653.
54. Foley, J. A., et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570-574.
55. Franklin, J. 1995. Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients. Progress in Physical Geography 19:474-499.
56. Fu, B., Y. Liu, Y. Lü, C. He, Y. Zeng, and B. Wu. 2011. Assessing the soil erosion control service of ecosystems change in the Loess Plateau of China. Ecological Complexity 8:284-293.
57. Geneletti, D. 2005. Formalising expert's opinion through multi-attribute value functions: an application in landscape ecology. Journal of Environmental Management 76:255-262.
58. Gimona, A., and D. van der Horst. 2007. Mapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions: a case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland. Landscape Ecology 22:1255-1264.
59. Guisan, A., S. B. Weiss, and A. D. Weiss. 1999. GLM versus CCA spatial modeling of plant species distribution. Plant Ecology 143:107-122.
60. Guisan, A., and N. E. Zimmermann. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135:147-186.
61. Harris, J. A., R. J. Hobbs, E. Higgs, and J. Aronson. 2006. Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restoration Ecology 14:170-176.
62. Hein, S., J. Voss, H. J. Poethke, and B. Schröder. 2007. Habitat suitability models for the conservation of thermophilic grasshoppers and bush crickets. Journal of Insect Conservation 11:221-240.
63. Hijmans, R. J., S. E. Cameron, J. L. Parra, P. G. Jones, and A. Jarvis. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25:1965-1978. http://www.worldclim.org
64. Hijmans, R. J., and van Etten J. 2012. Package "raster" version 1.9-92. http://raster.r-forge.r-project.org/
65. Hobbs, R. J. 2002. The ecological context: a landscape perspective. Pages 24-45 in M. R. Perrow and A. J. Davy, editors. Handbook of ecological restoration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
66. Hobbs, J., and V. Cramer. 2008. Restoration ecology: interventionist approaches for restoring and maintaining ecosystem function in the face of rapid environmental change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33:39-61.
67. Hobbs, R. J., L. M. Hallett, P. R. Ehrlich, and H. A. Mooney. 2011. Intervention ecology: applying ecological science in the twenty-first century. BioScience 61:442-450.
68. Hobbs, R. J., and J. A. Harris. 2001. Restoration ecology: repairing the earth's ecosystems in the new millennium. Restoration Ecology 9:239-246.
69. Hobbs, R., and D. Norton. 1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 4:93-110.
70. Hobbs, R. J., and D. A. Saunders. 1991. Re-integrating fragmented landscapes: a preliminary framework for the Western Australian wheatbelt. Journal of Environmental Management 33:161-167.
71. Holl, K., E. Crone, and C. Schultz. 2003. Landscape restoration: moving from generalities to methodologies. BioScience 53:491-502.
72. Holmgren, M. 2002. Exotic herbivores as drivers of plant invasion and switch to ecosystem alternative states. Biological Invasions 4:25-33.
73. Hosmer, D. W., and S. Lemeshow. 2000. Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
74. IGM [Instituto Geográfico Militar] 1990. Cartas regulares de Chile. Instituto Geográfico Militar, Santiago de Chile, Chile. INE [Instituto Nacional de Estadística]. 2003.
75. Censo 2002, Síntesis de resultados. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Santiago de Chile, Chile. http://www.ine.cl/cd2002/sintesiscensal.pdf
76. INE [Instituto Nacional de Estadística]. 2007. VII. Censo nacional agropecuario y forestal. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Santiago de Chile, Chile. http://www.ine.cl/canales/chile-estadistico/censosagropecuarios/censosagropecuarios.php
77. ITC [International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences]. 2001. ILWIS 3.0 Academic User's guide. International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences, Enschede, The Netherlands. http://www.itc.nl/ilwis/documentation/version3.asp
78. ITC [International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences]. 2007. ILWIS 3.31 Academic. International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences, Enschede, The Netherlands. http:// www.itc.nl/ilwis/downloads/ilwis33.asp
79. ITTO and IUCN [International Tropical Timber Organization and International Union for Conservation of Nature]. 2005. Restoring forest landscapes. An introduction to the art and science of forest landscape restoration. ITTO Technical Series No. 23, International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, Japan. http://www.itto.int/direct/ topics/topics-pdf-download/topics-id=10640000& no=1&-lang=ja IUCN and WRI [International Union for Conservation of Nature and World Resources Institute]. 2014. A guide to the Restoration Opportunities Assessment Methodology (ROAM): assessing forest landscape restoration opportunities at the national or subnational level. Working paper (Road-test edition). International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland. https://portals.iucn.org/library/ sites/library/files/documents/2014-030.pdf
80. Jordan, W. R., M. E. Gilpin, and J. D. Aber. 1987. Restoration ecology: a synthetic approach to ecological research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
81. Kienast, F., J. Bolliger, M. Potschin, R. S. Groot, P. H. Verburg, I. Heller, D. Wascher, and R. Haines-Young. 2009. Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data: insights gained from a prototype development for Europe. Environmental Management 44:1099-1120.
82. Lachat, T., and R. Bütler. 2009. Identifying conservation and restoration priorities for saproxylic and old-growth forest species: a case study in Switzerland. Environmental Management 44:105-118.
83. Laestadius, L., S. Maginnis, S. Minnemeyer, P. Potapov, C. Saint-Laurent, and N. Sizer. 2011. Mapping opportunities for forest landscape restoration. Unasylva 238:47-48. http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2560e/i2560e08.pdf
84. Lamb, D., P. D. Erskine, and J. A. Parrotta. 2005. Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science 310:1628-1632.
85. Lamb, D., and D. Gilmour. 2003. Rehabilitation and restoration of degraded forests. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK and World Wide Fund for Nature, Gland, Switzerland.
86. Lamb, D., J. Stanturf, and P. Madsen. 2012. What is Forest Landscape Restoration? Pages 3-23 in J. Stanturf, D. Lamb, and P. Madsen, editors. Forest Landscape Restoration: integrating natural and social sciences. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
87. Maes, J., M. L. Paracchini, G. Zulian, M. B. Dunbar, and R. Alkemade. 2012. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biological Conservation 155:1-12.
88. Maginnis, S., and W. Jackson. 2007. What is FLR and how does it differ from current approaches? Pages 5-20 in J. Rietbergen-McCracken, S. Maginnis, and A. Sarre, editors. The Forest Landscape Restoration handbook. Earthscan, London, UK.
89. Maginnis, S., J. W. Rietbergen-McCracken, and W. Jackson. 2007. Introduction. Pages 1-4 in J. Rietbergen-McCracken, S. Maginnis, and A. Sarre, editors. The Forest Landscape Restoration handbook. Earthscan, London, UK.
90. Mansourian, S. 2005. Overview of forest restoration strategies and terms. Pages 8-13 in S. Mansourian, D. Vallauri, and N. Dudley, editors. Forest restoration in landscapes: beyond planting trees. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
91. Mansourian, S., and N. Dudley. 2005. Challenges for Forest Landscape Restoration based on WWF's experience to date. Pages 94-98 in S. Mansourian, D. Vallauri, and N. Dudley, editors. Forest restoration in landscapes: beyond planting trees. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
92. Martínez-Harms, M. J., and P. Balvanera. 2012. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management 8:17-25.
93. McRae, B. H. 2006. Isolation by resistance. Evolution 60:1551-1561.
94. McRae, B. H., S. A. Hall, P. Beier, and D. M. Theobald. 2012. Where to restore ecological connectivity? Detecting barriers and quantifying restoration benefits. PLoS ONE 7:e52604.
95. McRae, B. H., and D. M. Kavanagh. 2011. Linkage Mapper connectivity analysis software. The Nature Conservancy, Seattle, Washington, USA. http://www.circuitscape.org/linkagemapper
96. McVicar, T. R., T. G. V. Niel, L. Li, Z. Wen, Q. Yang, R. Li, and F. Jiao. 2010. Parsimoniously modelling perennial vegetation suitability and identifying priority areas to support China's re-vegetation program in the Loess Plateau: matching model complexity to data availability. Forest Ecology and Management 259:1277-1290.
97. Menz, M. H. M., K. W. Dixon, and R. J. Hobbs. 2013. Hurdles and opportunities for landscape-scale restoration. Science 339:526-527.
98. Metzger, M. J., M. D. A. Rounsevell, L. Acosta-Michlik, R. Leemans, and D. Schröter. 2006. The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 114:69-85.
99. Mezquida, E. T., A. Rubio, and O. Sánchez-Palomares. 2010. Evaluation of the potential index model to predict habitat suitability of forest species: the potential distribution of mountain pine (Pinus uncinata) in the Iberian Peninsula. European Journal of Forest Research 129:133-140.
100. Milborrow, S. 2012. Package "plotmo" 1.3-1. http://www.milbo.users.sonic.net
101. Miller, J. R., and R. J. Hobbs. 2007. Habitat restoration-Do we know what we're doing? Restoration Ecology 15:382-390.
102. Ministry of Natural Resources-Rwanda. 2014. Forest Landscape Restoration opportunity assessment for Rwanda.Ministry of Natural Resources (MINIRENA) (Rwanda), International Union for Conservation of Nature and World Resources Institute. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/roar-web-version.pdf
103. Minnemeyer, S., L. Laestadius, N. Sizer, C. Saint-Laurent, and P. Potapov. 2011. A world of opportunity. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., USA. http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/worldofopportunity-brochure-2011-09.pdf
104. Muñoz, C., C. Ovalle, and E. Zagal. 2007. Distribution of soil organic carbon stock in an alfisol profile in Mediterranean Chilean ecosystems. Revista de la Ciencia del Suelo y Nutrición Vegetal 7:15-27.
105. Myers, N. 1997. The world's forests and their ecosystem services. Pages 216-236 in G. C. Dailey, editor. Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
106. Myers, N., R. A. Mittermeier, C. G. Mittermeier, G. A. B. da Fonseca, and J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853-858.
107. Natural Capital Project. 2013. Integrated valuation of environmental services and tradeoffs-InVEST 2.5.3 and InVEST 3.0. http://www.naturalcapital project.org/InVEST.html
108. Nelson, E., et al. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7:4-11.
109. Newton, A. C., and N. Tejedor, editors. 2011. Principles and practice of Forest Landscape Restoration: case studies from the drylands of Latin America. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
110. Noss, R., S. Nielsen, and K. Vance-Borland. 2009. Prioritizing ecosystems, species and sites for restoration. Pages 158-171 in A. Moilanen, K. A. Wilson, and H. P. Possingham, editors. Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
111. Orsi, F., and D. Geneletti. 2010. Identifying priority areas for forest landscape restoration in Chiapas (Mexico): an operational approach combining ecological and socioeconomic criteria. Landscape and Urban Planning 94:20-30.
112. Ovalle, C., J. Avendaño, J. Aronson, and A. D. Pozo. 1996. Land occupation patterns and vegetation structure in the anthropogenic savannas (espinales) of Central Chile. Forest Ecology and Management 86:129-139.
113. Pascual-Hortal, L., and S. Saura. 2006. Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation. Landscape Ecology 21:959-967.
114. Perez-Quezada, J. F., C. A. Delpiano, K. A. Snyder, D. A. Johnson, and N. Franck. 2011. Carbon pools in an arid shrubland in Chile under natural and afforested conditions. Journal of Arid Environments 75:29-37.
115. Petter, M., S. Mooney, S. M. Maynard, A. Davidson, M. Cox, and I. Horosak. 2012. A methodology to map ecosystem functions to support ecosystem services assessments. Ecology and Society 18:31.
116. Pielke, R. A., J. Adegoke, A. Beltrán-Przekurat, C. A. Hiemstra, J. Lin, U. S. Nair, D. Niyogi, and T. E. Nobis. 2007. An overview of regional land-use and land-cover impacts on rainfall. Tellus Series B 59:587-601.
117. Pinto, N., and T. H. Keitt. 2009. Beyond the least-cost path: evaluating corridor redundancy using a graph-theoretic approach. Landscape Ecology 24:253-266.
118. Pliscoff, P., M. T. K. Arroyo, and L. Cavieres. 2012. Changes in the main vegetation types of Chile predicted under climate change based on a preliminary study: models, uncertainties and adapting research to a dynamic biodiversity world. Anales Instituto Patagonia (Chile) 4:81-86.
119. Poor, E. E., C. Loucks, A. Jakes, and D. L. Urban. 2012. Comparing habitat suitability and connectivity modeling methods for conserving pronghorn migrations. PLoS ONE 7:1-12.
120. Pullar, D., and D. Lamb. 2012. A tool for comparing alternative forest landscape restoration scenarios. Pages 3-20 in J. Stanturf, P. Madsen, and D. Lamb, editors. A goal-oriented approach to Forest Landscape Restoration. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
121. Pullinger, M. G., and C. J. Johnson. 2010. Maintaining or restoring connectivity of modified landscapes: evaluating the least-cost path model with multiple sources of ecological information. Landscape Ecology 25:1547-1560.
122. R Development Core Team. 2010. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org
123. Raudsepp-Hearne, C., G. D. Peterson, and E. M. Bennett. 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107:5242-5247.
124. Reineking, B., and B. Schröder. 2006. Constrain to perform: regularization of habitat models. Ecological Modelling 193:675-690.
125. Ricketts, T. H., et al. 2008. Landscape effects on crop pollination services: Are there general patterns? Ecology Letters 11:499-515.
126. Rudnick, D. A., et al. 2012. The role of landscape connectivity in planning and implementing conservation and restoration priorities. Issues in Ecology 16:1-21.
127. Rundel, P.W. 1981. The matorral zone of Central Chile. Pages 175-201 in F. di Castri, D. W. Goodall, and R. L. Specht, editors. Mediterranean type shrublands. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
128. Rundel, P. W. 1999. Disturbance in Mediterranean climate shrublands and woodlands. Pages 271-285 in L. R. Walker, editor. Ecosystems of disturbed ground. Elsevier, New York, New York, USA.
129. Sabogal, C. 2007. Site-level restoration strategies for degraded primary forest. Pages 83-96 in J. Rietbergen-McCracken, S. Maginnis, and A. Sarre, editors. The Forest Landscape Restoration handbook. Earthscan, London, UK.
130. Saura, S., and L. Pascual-Hortal. 2007. A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landscape and Urban Planning 83:91-103.
131. Saura, S., and L. Rubio. 2010. A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape. Ecography 33:523-537.
132. Saura, S., and J. Torné. 2009. Conefor Sensinode 2.2: a software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity. Environmental Modelling and Software 24:135-139.
133. Conefor 2.6 version. http://www.conefor.org
134. Saura, S., P. Vogt, J. Velázquez, A. Hernando, and R. Tejera. 2011. Key structural forest connectors can be identified by combining landscape spatial pattern and network analyses. Forest Ecology and Management 262:150-160.
135. Schneiders, A., T. V. Daele, W. V. Landuyt, and W. V. Reeth. 2012. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: Complementary approaches for ecosystem management? Ecological Indicators 21:123-133.
136. Schulz, J. J., L. Cayuela, C. Echeverría, J. Salas, and J. M. Rey Benayas. 2010. Monitoring land cover change of the dryland forest landscape of Central Chile (1975-2008). Applied Geography 30: 436-447.
137. Schulz, J. J., L. Cayuela, J. M. Rey Benayas, and B. Schröder. 2011. Factors influencing vegetation cover change in Mediterranean Central Chile (1975-2008). Applied Vegetation Science 14:571-582.
138. SER [Society for Ecological Restoration International Science and Policy Working Group]. 2004. The SER international primer on ecological restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
139. Shvidenko, A., et al. 2005. Forest and woodland systems. Pages 585-621 in Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
140. Soille, P., and P. Vogt. 2009. Morphological segmentation of binary patterns. Pattern Recognition Letters 30:456-459.
141. Stanturf, J., D. Lamb, and P. Madsen. 2012. Forest Landscape Restoration: integrating natural and social sciences. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
142. Stanturf, J. A., B. J. Palik, and R. K. Dumroese. 2014a. Contemporary forest restoration: a review emphasizing function. Forest Ecology and Management 331:292-323.
143. Stanturf, J. A., B. J. Palik, M. I.Williams, R. K. Dumroese, and P. Madsen. 2014b. Forest restoration paradigms. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 33:161-194.
144. Suding, K. 2011. Toward an era of restoration in ecology: successes, failures, and opportunities ahead. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 42:465-487.
145. Suding, K. N., K. L. Gross, and G. R. Houseman. 2004. Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:46-53.
146. Swets, J. A. 1988. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:285-1293.
147. Tallis, H. T., et al. 2013. InVEST 2.5.3 user's guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford, California, USA.
148. Theobald, D. M., S. E. Reed, K. Fields, and M. Soulé. 2012. Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States. Conservation Letters 5:123-133.
149. Urban, D., and T. Keitt. 2001. Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82:1205-1218.
150. Urban, D. L., E. S. Minor, E. A. Treml, and R. S. Schick. 2009. Graph models of habitat mosaics. Ecology Letters 12:260-273.
151. Vallauri, D., J. Aronson, and N. Dudley. 2005. An attempt to develop a framework for restoration planning. Pages 65-70 in S. Mansourian, D. Vallauri, and N. Dudley, editors in Cooperation with World Wide Fund for Nature International. Forest restoration in landscapes: beyond planting trees. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
152. Verhagen, W., A. J. A. Van Teeffelen, A. Baggio Compagnucci, L. Poggio, A. Gimona, and P. H. Verburg. 2016. Effects of landscape configuration on mapping ecosystem service capacity: a review of evidence and a case study in Scotland. Landscape Ecology 31:1457-1479.
153. Vogt, P. 2012. GUIDOS 1.4 (Graphical User Interface for the Description of image Objects and their Shapes). Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission, TP 261, Ispra, Italy. http://forest.jrc.ec.europa.eu/download/software/guidos/
154. Vogt, P., K. H. Riitters, C. Estreguil, J. Kozak, T. G. Wade, and J. D. Wickham. 2007a. Mapping spatial patterns with morphological image processing. Landscape Ecology 22:171-177.
155. Vogt, P., K. H. Riitters, M. Iwanowski, C. Estreguil, J. Kozak, and P. Soille. 2007b. Mapping landscape corridors. Ecological Indicators 7:481-488.
156. Willemen, L., L. Hein, M. van Mensvoort, and P. H. Verburg. 2010. Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region. Ecological Indicators 10:62-73.
157. Willemen, L., P. H. Verburg, L. Hein, and M. van Mensvoort. 2008. Spatial characterization of landscape functions. Landscape and Urban Planning 88:34-43.
158. Wischmeier, W. H., and D. Smith. 1978. Predicting soil erosion losses: a guide to conservation planning. Agricultural Handbook No. 537. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, D.C., USA.
159. Wu, J., Z. Feng, Y. Gao, and J. Peng. 2013. Hotspot and relationship identification in multiple landscape services: a case study on an area with intensive human activities. Ecological Indicators 29:529-537.
160. Zeller, K. A., K. McGarigal, and A. R. Whiteley. 2012. Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landscape Ecology 27:777-797.
161. Zhang, X. H., Q. L. Huang, and C. Zhang. 2010. Analysis of forest landscape dynamics based on Forest Landscape Restoration: a case study of Yong'an city, Fujian province, China. European Journal of Forest Research 129:975-980.
162. Zhou, P., O. Luukkanen, T. Tokola, and J. Nieminen. 2008. Vegetation dynamics and forest landscape restoration in the Upper Min River watershed, Sichuan, China. Restoration Ecology 16:348-358.