On War as Law and Law as War

Leiden Journal of International Law

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 765-782

  Contreras, Francisco J ^a   de la Rasilla, Ignacio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^b GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009577039     PISSN: 09221565     EISSN: 14789698     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S092215650800530X     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. R. Kagan and W. Kristol (eds.), Present Dangers: Crisis and Opportunity in American Foreign and Defense Policy (2000).
2. A. A. Canςado Trindade, ‘The Primacy of International Law over Force’, in M. G. Kohen (ed.), Promoting Justice, Human Rights and Conflict Resolution through International Law. Liber Amicorum Lucius Caflish (2007), 1037, at 1054.
3. T. M. Franck, ‘Is Anything “Left”in International Law?’, (2005) Unbound: Harvard Journal of the Legal Left 59, at 61
4. N. Berman, ‘Intervention in a DividedWorld: Axes of Legitimacy’, (2006) 17 EJIL 743.
5. A. Anghie, Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (2004), 291.
6. A. Lorite Escorihuela, ‘Cultural Relativism the American Way: The Nationalist School of International Law in the United States’, (2005) 5 Global Jurist 1, at 114
7. I. de la Rasilla del Moral, ‘El interregno neoconservador’, preliminary study for R. Kagan and W. Kristol (eds.), Peligros Presentes (2005), 3.
8. D. F. Vagts, ‘Hegemonic International Law’(2001) 95 AJIL 843, at 884.
9. J. C. Yoo, The Powers of War and Peace (2005).
10. J. C. Yoo and J. C. Ho, ‘The Status of Terrorists’, (2003-2004) 44 Virginia Journal of International Law 207.
11. J. C. Yoo, ‘International Law and the War in Iraq’, (2003) 97 AJIL 563, at 564.
12. R. Wedgwood, ‘TheMultinational Action in Iraq and International law’, in A. Thakur and W. Pal Singh Sidhu (eds.), The Iraq Crisis and World Order: Structural, Institutional and Normative Challenges (2006), 420.
13. M. Glennon, ‘Platonism, Adaptivism, and Illusion in UN Reform’, (2006) 6 Chicago Journal of International Law 613.
14. T. M. Franck, ‘Terrorism and the Right to Self-Defence’, (2001) 95 AJIL 839.
15. J. C. Yoo, ‘Using Force’, (2004) 71 University of Chicago Law Review 729, at 797.
16. J. C. Yoo, ‘Force Rules: UN Reform and Intervention’, (2005-6) 6 Chicago Journal of International Law 641, at 649.
17. A. M. Slaughter, ‘Security, Solidarity and Sovereignty: The Grand Themes of UN Reform, (2005) 99 AJIL 619.
18. T. M. Franck, ‘The Power of Legitimacy and the Legitimacy of Power in an Age of Power Disequilibrium’, (2006) 100 AJIL 88, at 99.
19. A. Orakhelashvili, ‘Legal Stability and Claims of Change: The International Court's Treatment of Ius ad Bellum and Ius in Bello’, (2006) 75 Nordic Journal of International Law 371.
20. I. Scobbie, ‘Words My Mother Never Taught Me: In Defence of the International Court’, (2005) 99 AJIL 76.
21. Armed Activities, 35, paras.146-147.
22. C. J. Tams, ‘Note Analytique —Swimming with the Tide or Seeking to Stem it? Recent ICJ Rulings on the Law of Self-Defence’, (2005) 18 Revue québécoise de droit international 275.
23. I. Kant, Die Metaphysik der Sitten, in I. Kant, Kants Werke (1968), 355.
24. H. Lauterpacht, The Function of Law in the International Community (1933), 64.
25. T. Hobbes, Leviathan, in T. Hobbes, The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, ed. W. Molesworth (1966), III, at 158.
26. T. Couture, ‘State’, in C. B. Gray (ed.), The Philosophy of Law: An Encyclopedia (1999), II, at 836.
27. W. Godwin, An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice (1976).
28. H. Kelsen, Reine Rechtslehre: Einleitung in die rechtswissenschaftliche Problematik (1934), 28-9.
29. R. Kolb, ‘Origin of the Twin Terms Jus ad Bellum/Jus in Bello’, (1997) International Review of the Red Cross 553.
30. N. Berman, ‘Privileging Combat? Contemporary Conflict and the Legal Construction of War’, (2004-2005) 43 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 1.
31. F. J. Contreras and I. de la Rasilla, ‘Humanitarismo crítico y crítica del humanitarismo’, preliminary study for D. Kennedy, El lado oscuro de la virtud, trans. F. J. Contreras and I. de la Rasilla (2007) 11, at 30.
32. D. Kennedy, ‘Thinking against the Box, (1999-2000) 32 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 397.
33. K. Marx, Die deutsche Ideologie, in K. Marx and F. Engels, Werke (1978), III, 33.
34. C. Miéville, Between Equal Rights: A Marxist Theory of International Law (2005)
35. M. Koskenniemi, ‘What Should International Lawyers Learn from KarlMarx?’, (2004) 17 LJIL 229
36. B. Bowring, ‘Ideology Critique and International Law: Towards a Substantive Account of International Human Rights’, in C. Warbrick and S. Tierney (eds.), Towards an International Legal Community: The Sovereignty of States and the Sovereignty of International Law (2006), 193;
37. S. Marks International Law on the Left: Re-examiningMarxist Legacies (2008).
38. T. M. Franck, Recourse to Force: State Action against Threats and Armed Attacks (2002), 3.
39. M. Veuthey, Gueérilla et droit humanitaire (1983), 356.
40. R. M. Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (1977)
41. D. Kennedy and W. Fisher (eds.), The Canon of American Legal Thought (2006)
42. D. Kennedy ‘Lon L. Fuller y el canon del pensamiento legal estadounidense’, in (2008) 4 Revista Internacional de Pensamiento Políético 230.
43. M. Koskenniemi, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of the International Legal Argument (2005), at 616.
44. M. Koskenniemi, The Gentle Civiliser ofNations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870-1960 (2001)
45. M. Koskenniemi, ‘The Politics of International Law’, (1990) 1 EJIL 4, at 8.
46. M. Pera, ‘El relativismo, el cristianismo yOccidente’, in M. Pera and J. Ratzinger [Benedict XVI], Sin raíces: Europa, relativismo, cristianismo, Islam, trans. B. Moreno (2006), 26-7.
47. D. Kennedy, The Dark Sides of Virtue: Reassessing International Humanitarianism (2005).