Modulation of reward-related neural activation on sensation seeking across development

NeuroImage

Volumn 147, Issue , 2017, Pages 763-771

  Hawes, Samuel W ^a   Chahal, Rajpreet ^b   Hallquist, Michael N ^c   Paulsen, David J ^d   Geier, Charles F ^c   Luna, Beatriz ^d,e  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Development; fMRI; Reward; Sensation seeking

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT DEVELOPMENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; RESPONSE TIME; REWARD; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SENSATION SEEKING; YOUNG ADULT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OCULOGRAPHY; PERSONALITY; PHYSIOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; EYE MOVEMENT MEASUREMENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; PERSONALITY; REWARD; RISK-TAKING; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85009412385     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.020     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Andersen, S.L., Dumont, N.L., Teicher, M.H., Developmental differences in dopamine synthesis inhibition by (±)-7-OH-DPAT. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg'S. Arch. Pharmacol. 356:2 (1997), 173–181.
2. Ball, S.A., Carroll, K.M., Rounsaville, B.J., Sensation seeking, substance abuse, and psychopathology in treatment-seeking and community cocaine abusers. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 62(5), 1994, 1053.
3. Berkman, E.T., Falk, E.B., Beyond brain mapping using neural measures to predict real-world outcomes. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 22:1 (2013), 45–50.
4. Bjork, J.M., Knutson, B., Hommer, D.W., Incentive-elicited striatal activation in adolescent children of alcoholics. Addiction 103:8 (2008), 1308–1319, 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02250.x.
5. Bjork, J.M., Pardini, D.A., Who are those “risk-taking adolescents”? Individual differences in developmental neuroimaging research. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 11 (2015), 56–64.
6. Bornovalova, M.A., Cashman-Rolls, A., O'Donnell, J.M., Ettinger, K., Richards, J.B., Lejuez, C., Risk taking differences on a behavioral task as a function of potential reward/loss magnitude and individual differences in impulsivity and sensation seeking. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 93:3 (2009), 258–262.
7. Browne, M.W., Cudeck, R., Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S., (eds.) Testing Structural Equation Models, 1993, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 136–162.
8. Chen, F.F., Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct. Equ. Model. 14:3 (2007), 464–504.
9. Cheung, G.W., Rensvold, R.B., Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct. Equ. Model. 9:2 (2002), 233–255.
10. Cox, R.W., AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 29:3 (1996), 162–173.
11. Cservenka, A., Herting, M.M., Seghete, K.L.M., Hudson, K.A., Nagel, B.J., High and low sensation seeking adolescents show distinct patterns of brain activity during reward processing. Neuroimage 66 (2013), 184–193.
12. Dalley, J.W., Fryer, T.D., Brichard, L., Robinson, E.S., Theobald, D.E., Lääne, K., Probst, K., Nucleus accumbens D2/3 receptors predict trait impulsivity and cocaine reinforcement. Science 315:5816 (2007), 1267–1270.
13. Fonov, V.S., Evans, A.C., McKinstry, R.C., Almli, C., Collins, D., Unbiased nonlinear average age-appropriate brain templates from birth to adulthood. Neuroimage, 47, 2009, S102.
14. Galvan, A., Adolescent development of the reward system. Dev. Human. Brain, 2010, 116.
15. Galvan, A., Hare, T., Voss, H., Glover, G., Casey, B., Risk‐taking and the adolescent brain: who is at risk?. Dev. Sci. 10:2 (2007), F8–F14.
16. Geier, C.F., Luna, B., Developmental effects of incentives on response inhibition. Child Dev. 83:4 (2012), 1262–1274.
17. Geier, C.F., Terwilliger, R., Teslovich, T., Velanova, K., Luna, B., Immaturities in reward processing and its influence on inhibitory control in adolescence. Cereb. Cortex 20:7 (2010), 1613–1629, 10.1093/cercor/bhp225.
18. Gitelman, D.R., ILAB: a program for postexperimental eye movement analysis. Behav. Res. Methods, Instruments, Comput. 34:4 (2002), 605–612.
19. Gonzalez, R., Berman, M.G., The value of brain imaging in psychological research. Acta Psychol. Sin. 42:1 (2010), 111–119.
20. Greve, D.N., Fischl, B., Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. Neuroimage 48:1 (2009), 63–72.
21. Haber, S.N., Knutson, B., The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:1 (2010), 4–26.
22. Harden, K.P., Mann, F.D., Biological risk for the development of problem behavior in adolescence: integrating insights from behavioral genetics and neuroscience. Child Dev. Perspect. 9:4 (2015), 211–216.
23. Hayes, A.F., 2015. The PROCESS macro for SPSS and SAS.
24. Horvath, P., Zuckerman, M., Sensation seeking, risk appraisal, and risky behavior. Pers. Individ. Differ. 14:1 (1993), 41–52.
25. Ikemoto, S., Panksepp, J., The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in motivated behavior: a unifying interpretation with special reference to reward-seeking. Brain Res. Rev. 31:1 (1999), 6–41.
26. Johnson, P.O., Fay, L.C., The Johnson-Neyman technique, its theory and application. Psychometrika 15:4 (1950), 349–367.
27. Joseph, J.E., Liu, X., Jiang, Y., Lynam, D., Kelly, T.H., Neural correlates of emotional reactivity in sensation seeking. Psychol. Sci. 20:2 (2009), 215–223.
28. Leyton, M., Boileau, I., Benkelfat, C., Diksic, M., Baker, G., Dagher, A., Amphetamine-induced increases in extracellular dopamine, drug wanting, and novelty seeking: a PET/[11C] raclopride study in healthy men. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:6 (2002), 1027–1035.
29. Lind, N.M., Gjedde, A., Moustgaard, A., Olsen, A.K., Jensen, S.B., Jakobsen, S., Cumming, P., Behavioral response to novelty correlates with dopamine receptor availability in striatum of Göttingen mini pigs. Behav. Brain Res. 164:2 (2005), 172–177.
30. Luciana, M., Wahlstrom, D., Porter, J.N., Collins, P.F., Dopaminergic modulation of incentive motivation in adolescence: age-related changes in signaling, individual differences, and implications for the development of self-regulation. Dev. Psychol., 48(3), 2012, 844.
31. Luking, K.R., Luby, J.L., Barch, D.M., Kids, candy, brain and behavior: age differences in responses to candy gains and losses. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 9 (2014), 82–92.
32. Luna, B., Garver, K.E., Urban, T.A., Lazar, N.A., Sweeney, J.A., Maturation of cognitive processes from late childhood to adulthood. Child Dev. 75:5 (2004), 1357–1372.
33. Luna, B., Paulsen, D.J., Padmanabhan, A., Geier, C., The teenage brain cognitive control and motivation. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 22:2 (2013), 94–100.
34. Mann, F.D., Patterson, M.W., Grotzinger, A.D., Kretsch, N., Tackett, J.L., Tucker-Drob, E.M., Harden, K.P., 2016. Sensation Seeking, Peer Deviance, and Genetic Influences on Adolescent Delinquency: Evidence for Person-Environment Correlation and Interaction.
35. McCutcheon, J.E., Marinelli, M., Age matters. Eur. J. Neurosci. 29:5 (2009), 997–1014.
36. McDonald, R.P., Ho, M.R., Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol. Methods 7:1 (2002), 64–82, 10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.64.
37. Millman, K.J., Brett, M., Analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in Python. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9:3 (2007), 52–55.
38. Muthén, L.K., Muthén, B.O., Mplus User's Guide. Seventh Edition. 1998, 2012, Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA.
39. Neria, Y., Solomon, Z., Ginzburg, K., Dekel, R., Sensation seeking, wartime performance, and long-term adjustment among Israeli war veterans. Pers. Individ. Differ. 29:5 (2000), 921–932.
40. Ollinger, J., Corbetta, M., Shulman, G., Separating processes within a trial in event-related functional MRI: ii. Analysis. Neuroimage 13:1 (2001), 218–229.
41. Ollinger, J., Shulman, G.L., Corbetta, M., Separating processes within a trial in event-related functional MRI: i. The method. Neuroimage 13:1 (2001), 210–217.
42. Padmanabhan, A., Geier, C.F., Ordaz, S.J., Teslovich, T., Luna, B., Developmental changes in brain function underlying the influence of reward processing on inhibitory control. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 1:4 (2011), 517–529.
43. Padmanabhan, A., Luna, B., Developmental imaging genetics: linking dopamine function to adolescent behavior. Brain Cogn. 89 (2014), 27–38.
44. Paulsen, D.J., Hallquist, M.N., Geier, C.F., Luna, B., Effects of incentives, age, and behavior on brain activation during inhibitory control: a longitudinal fMRI study. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci., 2014.
45. Paulsen, D.J., Hallquist, M.N., Geier, C.F., Luna, B., Effects of incentives, age, and behavior on brain activation during inhibitory control: a longitudinal fMRI study. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 11 (2015), 105–115.
46. Plichta, M.M., Scheres, A., Ventral–striatal responsiveness during reward anticipation in ADHD and its relation to trait impulsivity in the healthy population: a meta-analytic review of the fMRI literature. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 38 (2014), 125–134.
47. Potthoff, R.F., On the Johnson-Neyman technique and some extensions thereof. Psychometrika 29:3 (1964), 241–256.
48. Richards, J.M., Plate, R.C., Ernst, M., A systematic review of fMRI reward paradigms used in studies of adolescents vs. adults: the impact of task design and implications for understanding neurodevelopment. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37:5 (2013), 976–991.
49. Roche, A., A four-dimensional registration algorithm with application to joint correction of motion and slice timing in fMRI. Med. Imaging, IEEE Trans. 30:8 (2011), 1546–1554.
50. Slutske, W.S., Heath, A.C., Madden, P.A., Bucholz, K.K., Statham, D.J., Martin, N.G., Personality and the genetic risk for alcohol dependence. J. Abnorm. Psychol., 111(1), 2002, 124.
51. Smith, S.M., Jenkinson, M., Woolrich, M.W., Beckmann, C.F., Behrens, T.E.J., Johansen-Berg, H., Matthews, P.M., Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23 (2004), S208–S219, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051.
52. Staiger, P.K., Kambouropoulos, N., Dawe, S., Should personality traits be considered when refining substance misuse treatment programs?. Drug alcohol Rev. 26:1 (2007), 17–23.
53. Steinberg, L., A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Dev. Rev. 28:1 (2008), 78–106.
54. Stoel, R.D., De Geus, E.J., Boomsma, D.I., Genetic analysis of sensation seeking with an extended twin design. Behav. Genet. 36:2 (2006), 229–237.
55. Terracciano, A., Esko, T., Sutin, A., De Moor, M., Meirelles, O., Zhu, G., Realo, A., Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies common variants in CTNNA2 associated with excitement-seeking. Transl. Psychiatry, 1(10), 2011, e49.
56. Wahlstrom, D., Collins, P., White, T., Luciana, M., Developmental changes in dopamine neurotransmission in adolescence: behavioral implications and issues in assessment. Brain Cogn. 72:1 (2010), 146–159.
57. Wechsler, D., Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. 1999, The Psychological Corporation: Harcourt Brace & Company, New York, NY.
58. Woolrich, M.W., Behrens, T.E., Beckmann, C.F., Jenkinson, M., Smith, S.M., Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference. Neuroimage 21:4 (2004), 1732–1747.
59. Zuckerman, M., Experience and desire: a new format for sensation seeking scales. J. Behav. Assess. 6 (1984), 101–114.
60. Zuckerman, M., Behavioral Expressions and Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking. 1994, Cambridge University Press.
61. Zuckerman, M., Sensation Seeking and Risk. 2007, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
62. Zuckerman, M., Como, P., Sensation seeking and arousal systems. Pers. Individ. Differ. 4 (1983), 381–386.
63. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D.M., Personality and risk‐taking: common bisocial factors. J. Pers. 68:6 (2000), 999–1029.