The internet and discursive exclusion: From deliberative to agonistic public sphere theory

Radical Democracy and the Internet: Interrogating Theory and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 128-147

  Dahlberg, Lincoln ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009296836     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1057/9780230592469     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Atton, C. (2006). Far-right media on the Internet: Culture, discourse and power, New Media & Society, 8(4), 573-586.
2. Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Bickel, B. (2003). Weapons of magic: Afghan women asserting voice via the Net, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 8(2). Retrieved 20 March 2006 from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol8/issue2/bickel.html.
4. Bohman, J. (1996). Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity, and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
5. Clift, S. (2003, December). Democratic evolution or virtual civil war. Paper presented at the Promise of E-Democracy WSIS Event, Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved 29 May 2006 from http://www.publicus.net/articles/democraticevolution.html.
6. Dahlberg, L. (2001). The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere, Information, Communication & Society, 4(4), 615-633.
7. Dahlberg, L. (2004a). Cyber-publics and the corporate control of online communication, Javnost-The Public, 11(3), 77-92.
8. Dahlberg, L. (2004b). The Habermasian public sphere: A specification of the idealized conditions of democratic communication, Studies in Social and Political Thought, 10, 2-18.
9. Dahlberg, L. (2005). The corporate colonization of online attention and the marginalization of critical communication? Journal of Communication Inquiry, 29(2), 1-21.
10. Dean, J. (1996). Civil society: Beyond the public sphere. In D. Rasmussen (Ed.), The handbook of Critical Theory (pp. 220-239). Oxford: Blackwell.
11. Downey, J., & Fenton, N. (2003). New media, counter publicity and the public sphere. New Media & Society, 5(2), 185-202.
12. Dyer-Witheford, N. (2004). Autonomist Marxism and the information society. Multitudes, 3 June. Retrieved 20 March 2006 from http://multitudes.samizdat.net /article.php3?id_article=1502.
13. Dyer-Witheford, N. (2007). Hegemony or multitude? Two versions of radical democracy for the Net. In L. Dahlberg & E. Siapera (Eds.), The Internet and radical democracy: Interrogating theory and practice. London: Palgrave.
14. Fang, N.-H. (1995). The Internet as a public sphere: A Habermasian approach.Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Faculty of the Graduate School, State University of New York, Buffalo.
15. Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and deliberation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In F. Barker, P. Hulme, & M. Iversen (Eds.), Postmodernism and the re-reading of modernity (pp. 197-231). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
17. Fung, A. Y.-H., & Kedl, K. D. (2000). Representative publics, political discourses and the Internet: A case study of a degenerated public sphere in a Chinese online community. World Communication, 29(4), 69-84.
18. Gallo, J. (2003, October). Online oppositional communities as discursive counterpublics.Paper presented at the Association of Internet Researchers Conference, Toronto.
19. Garrido, M., & Halavais, A. (2003). Mapping networks of support for the Zapatista movement: Applying social-networks analysis to study contemporary social movements. In M. McCaughey & M.D. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice (pp. 165-184). New York: Routledge.
20. Gimmler, A. (2001). Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the internet. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 27(4), 21-39.
21. Graham, T. (2002). Deliberating in online forums: New hope for the public sphere?Unpublished Masters Dissertation, University Amsterdam, Amsterdam School of Communications.
22. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
23. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Trans. T. McCarthy) (Vol. One, of Reason and the Rationalization of Society). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
24. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (Trans. T. Burger with F. Lawrence). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (Trans. W. Rehg). Cambridge: Polity Press.
26. Howarth, D. (2000). Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
27. Janssen, D., & Kies, R. (2005). Online forums and deliberative democracy. Acta Politica, 40(3), 384-392.
28. Johnston, J., & Laxer, G. (2003). Solidarity in the age of globalization: Lessons from the anti-MAI and Zapatista struggles. Theory and Society, 32(1), 39-91.
29. Jordan, T. (2007). Online direct action: Hacktivism and radical democracy. In L. Dahlberg & E. Siapera (Eds.), The Internet and radical democracy: Interrogating theory and practice. London: Palgrave.
30. Jordan, T., & Taylor, P. A. (2004). Hacktivism and cyberwars: Rebels with a cause? London: Routledge.
31. Kahn, R., & Kellner, D. (2005). Oppositional politics and the Internet: A critical/ reconstructive approach. Cultural Politics: An International Journal, 1(1), 75-100.
32. Kahn. R., & Kellner, D. (2007). Globalization, Technopolitics and Radical Democracy. In L. Dahlberg & E. Siapera (Eds.), The Internet and radical democracy: Interrogating theory and practice. London: Palgrave.
33. Kellner, D. (1998). Intellectuals, the new public spheres, and techno-politics. In C. Toulouse & T. W. Luke (Eds.), The politics of cyberspace: A new political science reader (pp. 167-186). New York: Routledge.
34. Kowal, D. M. (2002). Digitizing and globalizing indigenous voices: The Zapatista movement. In G. Elmer (Ed.), Critical perspectives on the Internet (pp. 105-126). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
35. Langman, L. (2005). From virtual public spheres to global justice: A critical theory of Internetworked social movements. Sociological Theory, 23(1), 42-74.
36. Mitra, A., & Watts, R. (2002). Theorizing cyberspace: The idea of voice applied to the internet discourse. New Media & Society, 4(4), 479-498.
37. Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
38. Mouffe, C. (2005). For an agonistic public sphere. In L. Tønder & L. Thomassen (Eds.), Radical democracy: Politics between abundance and lack (pp. 191-205). Manchester: University of Manchester Press.
39. Negt, O., & Kluge, A. (1993). Public sphere and experience: Toward an analysis of the bourgeois and proletarian public spheres (Trans. P. Labanyi, J. O. Daniel, & A. Oksiloff). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
40. Noveck, B. S. (2000). Paradoxical partners: Electronic communication and electronic democracy. In P. Ferdinand (Ed.), The Internet, democracy, and democratization (pp. 18-35). London: Routledge.
41. Oblak, T. (2001). Images of electronic democracy: Communications technologies and changes in communication and participation processes. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences.
42. Palczewski, C. H. (2001). Cyber-movements, new social movements, and counterpublics. In D. Brouwer & R. Asen (Eds.), Counter-publics and the state (pp. 9-27). New York: SUNY press.
43. Rabinovitch, E. (2001). Gender and the public sphere: Alternative forms of integration in nineteenth-century America. Sociological Theory, 19(3), 344-369.
44. Salazar, J. F. (2003). Articulating an activist imaginary: Internet as counter public sphere in the Mapuche Movement, 1997/2002. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy, 107, 19-30.
45. Schneider, S. M. (1997). Expanding the public sphere through computer-mediated communication: Political discussion about abortion in a Usenet newsgroup. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Political Science, MIT, Massachusetts.
46. Smith, P., & Smythe, E. (2001). Globalisation, citizenship and technology. In F. Webster (Ed.), Culture and politics in the information age: A new politics?(pp. 183-206). London: Routledge.
47. Sunstein, C. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48. Tanner, E. (2001). Chilean conversations: Internet forum participants debate Augusto Pinochet's detention. Journal of Communication, 51(2), 383-403.
49. Villa, D. R. (1992). Postmodernism and the public sphere. American political science review, 86(3), 712-721.
50. Warf, B., & Girmes, J. (1997). Counterhegemonic discourses and the Internet. Geographical Review, 87(2), 259-274.
51. Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counter-publics. New York: Zone Books.
52. Wilhelm, A. G. (2000). Democracy in the digital age: Challenges to political life in cyberspace. London: Routledge.
53. Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Young, I. M. (2001). Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29(5), 670-690.