Cyber-publics and the corporate control of online communication

Javnost

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 77-92

  Dahlberg, Lincoln ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 8844280924     PISSN: 13183222     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13183222.2004.11008861     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bagdikian, Ben H. 2000. The Media Monopoly. Boston: Beacon Press.
2. Barbrook, Richard. 2002. The Regulation of Liberty: Free Speech, Free Trade and Free Gifts on The Net. Science as Culture 11, 2, 155-170.
3. Barney, Darin. 2000. Prometheus Wired: The Hope for Democracy in the Age of Network Technology. Sydney: UNSW Press.
4. Barney, Darin. 2003. Invasions of Publicity: Digital Networks and the Privatization of the Public Sphere. In Law Commission of Canada (ed.), New Perspectives on the Public/Private Divide, 8-22. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
5. Bollier, David and Tim Watts 2002. Saving the Information Commons: A Public Interest Agenda in Digital Media. New America Foundation. Retrieved March 21, 2004, from http://www.newamerica.net/Download_Docs /pdfs/PubFile866_1.pdf.
6. Chester, Jeff. 2002. The Death of the Internet: How Industry Intends to Kill the 'Net as we know it. TomPain.Common Sense (24 October). http://www.tompaine.com/feature.cfm/ID/6600/view/print.
7. Dahlberg, Lincoln. 2002. Democratic Visions, Commercial Realities? The Corporate Domination of Cyberspace and the Prospects for Online Deliberation. AntePodium, Aprilhttp://www.vuw.ac.nz/atp/articles /Dahlberg_0204.html.
8. Dahlberg. Lincoln. Forthcoming. The Internet as Public Sphere or Culture Industry? From Pessimism to Hope and Back. Media and Cultural Politics 1, 1.
9. Dahlgren, Peter 2001. The Public Sphere and the Net: Structure, Space, and Communication. In L. W. Bennett & R. M. Entman (eds.), Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, 33-55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Dryzek, John S. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Dyer-Witheford, Nick. 2002. E-Capital and the Many-Headed Hydra. In G. Elmer (ed.), Critical Perspectives on the Internet, 130-163. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
12. Dyson, Esther, George Gilder, George Keyworth, and Alvin Toffler. 1994. A Magna Carta for the Knowledge Age. The Progress and Freedom Foundation. Retrieved April 19 2004 from http://www.pff.org/publications /ecommerce/fi1.2magnacarta.html.
13. Fortier, Frano̧is. 2001. Virtuality Check. London: Verso.
14. Gates, Bill. 1995. The Road Ahead. New York: Viking.
15. Gates, Bill. 1999. Business The Speed of Thought: Using a Digital Nervous System. New York: Warner Books.
16. Gimmler, Antje. 2001. Deliberative Democracy, The Public Sphere and the Internet. Philosophy & Social Criticism 27, 4, 21-39.
17. Greene, Thomas C. 2004. Tech Heavyweights Explain How to Destroy the Internet. The Register (1 April). Retrieved April 20, 2004 from http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/04/01/tech_heavyweightsexplain_how.
18. Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Translated by William Rehg. Cambridge: Polity Press.
19. Hanluain, Daithi. 2004. Free Content Becoming a Thing of the Past for UK's Online Newspaper Sites. Online Journalism Review (13 February). Retrieved February 20, 2004, from http://www.ojr.org/ojr /business/1067472919.php.
20. Hargittai, Eszter. Forthcoming. The Changing Online Landscape: From Free-For-All to Commercial Gatekeeping. In P. Day and D. Schuler (eds.), Community Practice in the Network Society: Local Actions/Global Interaction. New York: Routledge.
21. Jordan, Tim and Paul A.Taylor. 2004. Hacktivism and Cyberwars: Rebels With a Cause. London: Routledge.
22. Kellner, Douglas. 1998. Intellectuals, the New Public Spheres, and Techno-Politics. In C. Toulouse and T. W, Luke (eds.), The Politics of Cyberspace: A New Political Science Reader, 167-186. New York: Routledge.
23. Kellner, Douglas. 2000. Habermas, the Public Sphere, and Democracy: A Critical Intervention. In L. E. Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas, 259-287. Peru, IL: Open Court.
24. Kelly, Kevin. 1998. New Rules for the New Economy: Ten Ways the Network Economy is Changing Everything. Fourth Estate: London.
25. Keyworth, George. A. 1997. People and Society in Cyberspace, the Shape of Things: Exploring the Evolving Transformation of American Life. Progress and Freedom Foundation. Retrieved October 21, 2003 from http://www.pff.org/tsot-l.html.
26. Lasica, J. D. 2003. Are Digital Newspaper Editions More than Smoke and Mirrors? Online Journalism Review (4 June). Retrieved February 20, 2004, from http://www.ojr.org/ojr/technology/1054780462.php.
27. Lessig, Lawrence. 1999. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
28. Lessig, Lawrence. 2001. The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. New York: Random House.
29. Lessig, Lawrence. 2004. Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: The Penguin Press.
30. Levine, Peter. 2002. Building the Electronic Commons: A Project of the Democracy Collaborative. Retrieved April 10, 2004, from http:/ /www.democracycollaborative.org/programs/public /BuildingElectronicCommons.pdf.
31. Lohr, Steve and David D. Kirkpatrick. 2003. AOL Time Warner and Microsoft End a Bitter Rivalry. The New York Times, 30 May.
32. Markoff, John. 2003. Microsoft Finds Some Doubters for the Motives of its Largesse. New York Times, 26 May.
33. Matustík, Martin J. B. 1998. Specters of Liberation: Great Refusals in the New World Order. Albany: State University of New York Press.
34. May, Christopher. 2000. A global Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights: The New Enclosures? London: Routledge.
35. McChesney, Robert W. 1999. Rich Media, Poor Democracy. Communication Politics in Dubious Times. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
36. McChesney, Robert W. 2002. The Titanic Sails On: Why the Internet Won't Sink the Media Giants. In G. Dines and J. Humez (eds.), Gender, Race and Class in Media, 667-683. London: Sage.
37. McChesney, Robert W. 2004. The Problem of the Media: U.S. Communication Politics in the Twenty First Century. New York: Monthly Review.
38. Oakes, Chris. 2000. Cable Net Users Feel Squeezed. Wired (18 August). Retrieved April 20, 2004, from http://www.wired.com/news /technology/0.1282.38227.00.html.
39. Patelis, Korinna. 2000. E-Mediation by America Online. In R. Rogers (ed. , Preferred Placement: Knowledge Politics on the Web, 50-63. Masstricht: Jan van Eyck Akadamie.
40. Sallet, Jonathan. 2003. Just How Open Must an Open Network be for an Open Network to be Labeled "Open"? FirstMonday 8m 3. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/ issue8_3/sallet.
41. Salter, Lee. 2003. The Internet: Potentiality and Limits. Paper presented at Workshop on The Internet: Structure and Use (3 September). London: Metropolitan University.
42. Saltzer, Jerome H. 1999. "Open Access" is Just the Tip of The Iceberg. Retrieved October 21, 2003, from http://web.mit.edu /Saltzer/www/publications/openaccess.html.
43. Sandvig, Christian. Forthcoming. Shaping Infrastructure and Innovation on the Internet: The End-to-End Network that Isn't. In D. Guston & D. Sarewitz (eds.), Shaping Science and Technology Policy: The Next Generation of Research. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Draft Retrieved July 2004, from http://www.spcomm.uiuc.edu/users /csandvig/research/Communication_InfrastructureandInnovation.pdf.
44. Sassen, Saskia. 2000. Digital Network and the State. Theory, Culture & Society 17, 4, 19-33.
45. Schiller, Dan. 1999. Networking the Global Market System. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
46. Shapiro, Andrew. 1999. The Control Revolution: How the Internet is Putting Individuals in Charge and Changing the World as We Know It. New York: Public Affairs.
47. Winseck, Dwayne. 2002. Netscapes of Power: Convergence, Consolidation and Power in the Canadian Mediascape. Media, Culture & Society 24, 6, 795-819.
48. Young, Iris M. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.