Assessing the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Calibrated with Capillary Values Using Capillary or Venous Glucose Levels as a Reference

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 876-884

  Andelin, Mervi ^a   Kropff, Jort ^b   Matuleviciene, Viktorija ^c   Joseph, Jeffrey I ^d   Attvall, Stig ^c   Theodorsson, Elvar ^e   Hirsch, Irl B ^f   Imberg, Henrik ^g   Dahlqvist, Sofia ^a   Klonoff, David ^h   Haraldsson, Börje ^c   DeVries, J Hans ^b   Lind, Marcus ^a,c  

^a UDDEVALLA HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^d THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^g Statistiska Konsultgruppen   (Sweden)

^h DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

accuracy; calibration; capillary; continuous glucose monitoring (CGM); type 1 diabetes; venous

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CAPILLARY BLOOD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HUMAN; HYPERGLYCEMIA; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MALE; MICROALBUMINURIA; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS; BLOOD; CALIBRATION; CAPILLARY; CLINICAL TRIAL; REFERENCE VALUE; STANDARDS; VEIN;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CALIBRATION; CAPILLARIES; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUES; VEINS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85009266652     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1932296815626724     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Study Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329: 977-986.
2. Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, et al. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 2643-2653.
3. Lind M, Bounias I, Olsson M, et al. Glycaemic control and incidence of heart failure in 20,985 patients with type 1 diabetes: an observational study. Lancet. 2011; 378: 140-146.
4. Lind M, Svensson AM, Kosiborod M, et al. Glycemic control and excess mortality in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371 (21): 1972-1982.
5. Livingstone SJ, Levin D, Looker HC, et al. Estimated life expectancy in a Scottish cohort with type 1 diabetes, 2008-2010. JAMA. 2015; 6; 313 (1): 37-44.
6. Pickup JC, Freeman SC, Sutton AJ., Glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes during real time continuous glucose monitoring compared with selfmonitoring of blood glucose: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials using individual patient data. BMJ. 2011; 7; 343: d3805.
7. Battelino T, Conget I, Olsen B, et al. The use and efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump therapy: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia. 2012; 55 (12): 3155-3162.
8. Langendam M, Luijf YM, Hooft L, Devries JH, Mudde AH, Scholten RJ., Continuous glucose monitoring systems for type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 1: CD008101.
9. Kovatchev BP., Hypoglycemia reduction and accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015; 17: 530-533.
10. Kovatchev BP, Patek SD, Ortiz EA, Breton MD., Assessing sensor accuracy for non adjunct use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015; 17 (3): 177-186.
11. Luijf YM, Avogaro A, Benesch C, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring accuracy results vary between assessment at home and assessment at the clinical research center. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012; 6 (5): 1103-1106.
12. Matuleviciene V, Joseph J, Andelin M, et al. A clinical trial of the accuracy and treatment experience of the Dexcom G4 Sensor (Dexcom G4 System) and Enlite Sensor (Guardian REAL-Time System) tested simultaneously in ambulatory patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014; 16 (11): 759-767.
13. Christiansen M, Bailey T, Watkins E, et al. A new-generation continuous glucose monitoring system: improved accuracy and reliability compared with a previous-generation system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 10; 2013; 15 (10): 881-888.
14. Leelarathna L, Nodale M, Allen JM, et al. Evaluating the accuracy and large inaccuracy of two continuous glucose monitoring systems. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013; 15 (2): 143-149.
15. Keenan DB, Mastrototaro JJ, Zisser H, et al. Accuracy of the Enlite 6-day glucose sensor with guardian and Veo calibration algorithms. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012; 14 (3): 225-231.
16. Kropff J, Bruttomesso D, Doll W, et al. Accuracy of two continuous glucose monitoring systems: a head-to-head comparison under clinical research centre and daily life conditions. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015; 17 (4): 343-349.
17. Kovatchev B, Anderson S, Heinemann L, Clarke W., Comparison of the numerical and clinical accuracy of four continuous glucose monitors. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31 (6): 1160-1164.
18. Damiano ER, McKeon K, El-Khatib FH, Zheng H, Nathan DM, Russell SJ., A comparative effectiveness analysis of three continuous glucose monitors: the Navigator, G4 Platinum, and Enlite. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014; 8 (4): 699-708.
19. Luijf YM, Mader JK, Doll W, et al. Accuracy and reliability of continuous glucose monitoring systems: a head-to-head comparison. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013; 15 (8): 721-726.
20. Pleus S, Schoemaker M, Morgenstern K, et al. Rate-of-change dependence of the performance of two CGM systems during induced glucose swings. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015; 9: 801-807.
21. Kempe K, Price D, Ellison J, et al. Capillary and venous blood glucose concentrations measured during intravenous insulin and glucose infusion: a comparison of steady and dynamic states. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009; 11 (10): 669-674.
22. Kuwa K, Nakayama T, Hoshino T, Tominaga M., Relationships of glucose concentrations in capillary whole blood, venous whole blood and venous plasma. Clin Chim Acta. 2001; 307 (1-2): 187-192.
23. Hannestad U, Lundblad A., Accurate and precise isotope dilution mass spectrometry method for determining glucose in whole blood. Clin Chem. 1997; 43 (5): 794-800.
24. Snjezana K, van Meerker A, van der Linden J, Stiphout T, Wulkan R., Validation of a new generation POCT glucose device with emphasis on aspects important for glycemic control in the hospital care. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012; 50 (9) 1573-1580.
25. Hodges JL, Lehmann EL,. Estimates of location based on rank tests. Ann Math Stat. 1963; 34: 598-611.
26. Senn S., Cross-over trials in statistics in medicine: the first "25" years. Stat Med. 2006; 25 (20): 3430-3442.
27. Liu D, Moberg E, Kollind M, Lins PE, Adamson U, Macdonald IA., Arterial, arterialized venous, venous and capillary blood glucose measurements in normal man during hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemia and hypoglycaemia. Diabetologia. 1992; 35 (3): 287-290.