Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy Using a Portable, Noncontact, Nonmydriatic Handheld Retinal Camera

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 128-134

  Zhang, Wenlan ^a   Nicholas, Peter ^a   Schuman, Stefanie Gail ^a   Allingham, Michael John ^a   Faridi, Ambar ^a   Suthar, Tushar ^a   Cousins, Scott William ^a   Prakalapakorn, Sasapin Grace ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

diabetic retinopathy; handheld camera; portable imaging; retina; screening; telemedicine

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EYE EXAMINATION; GENERAL DEVICE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETINAL CAMERA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ADULT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES; RETINA;

ADULT; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PHOTOGRAPHY; RETINA;

EID: 85009241696     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1932296816658902     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. World Health Organization. Global data on visual impairments 2010. 2012. http://www.who.int/blindness/GLOBALDATAFINALforweb.pdf.
2. Burling-Phillips L., Diabetic retinopathy: covering the bases. http://www.aao.org/publications/eyenet/200605/retina.cfm.
3. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Preferred Practice Pattern (R) guidelines. 2014. http://www.aao.org/ppp.
4. Vaziri K, Moshfeghi DM, Moshfeghi AA, eds. Feasibility of Telemedicine in Detecting Diabetic Retinopathy and Age-Related Macular Degeneration. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare USA; 2013.
5. Schoenfeld ER, Greene JM, Wu SY, Leske MC., Patterns of adherence to diabetes vision care guidelines: baseline findings from the Diabetic Retinopathy Awareness Program. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108 (3): 563-571.
6. Boucher MC, Desroches G, Garcia-Salinas R, et al. Teleophthalmology screening for diabetic retinopathy through mobile imaging units within Canada. Can J Ophthalmol. 2008; 43 (6): 658-668.
7. Mansberger SL, Gleitsmann K, Gardiner S, et al. Comparing the effectiveness of telemedicine and traditional surveillance in providing diabetic retinopathy screening examinations: a randomized controlled trial. Telemed J Ehealth. 2013; 19 (12): 942-948.
8. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 12. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98 (5 suppl): 823-833.
9. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs-an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98 (5 suppl): 786-806.
10. Yogesan K, Constable IJ, Barry CJ, et al. Evaluation of a portable fundus camera for use in the teleophthalmologic diagnosis of glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1999; 8 (5): 297-301.
11. Maamari RN, Keenan JD, Fletcher DA, Margolis TP., A mobile phone-based retinal camera for portable wide field imaging. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014; 98 (4): 438-441.
12. Tran K, Mendel TA, Holbrook KL, Yates PA., Construction of an inexpensive, hand-held fundus camera through modification of a consumer "point-and-shoot" camera. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53 (12): 7600-7607.
13. Micheletti JM, Hendrick AM, Khan FN, Ziemer DC, Pasquel FJ., Current and next generation portable screening devices for diabetic retinopathy. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016; 10 (2): 295-300.
14. Russo A, Morescalchi F, Costagliola C, Delcassi L, Semeraro F., Comparison of smartphone ophthalmoscopy with slit-lamp biomicroscopy for grading diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015; 159 (2): 360-364.
15. Prakalapakorn SG, Wallace DK, Freedman SF., Retinal imaging in premature infants using the Pictor noncontact digital camera. J Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2014; 18 (4): 321-326.
16. Bursell SE, Cavallerano JD, Cavallerano AA, et al. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108 (3): 572-585.
17. Lin DY, Blumenkranz MS, Brothers RJ, Grosvenor DM., The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002; 134 (2): 204-213.
18. Vujosevic S, Benetti E, Massignan F, et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: 1 and 3 nonmydriatic 45-degree digital fundus photographs vs 7 standard early treatment diabetic retinopathy study fields. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009; 148 (1): 111-118.
19. Williams GA, Scott IU, Haller JA, Maguire AM, Marcus D, McDonald HR., Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111 (5): 1055-1062.
20. Massin P, Erginay A, Ben Mehidi A, et al. Evaluation of a new non-mydriatic digital camera for detection of diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med. 2003; 20 (8): 635-641.
21. Gupta V, Bansal R, Gupta A, Bhansali A., Sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital imaging in screening diabetic retinopathy in Indian eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014; 62 (8): 851-856.
22. Shi L, Wu H, Dong J, Jiang K, Lu X, Shi J., Telemedicine for detecting diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015; 99 (6): 823-831.
23. British Diabetic Association. Retinal Photographic Screening for Diabetic Eye Disease. A British Diabetic Association Report. London: British Diabetic Association; 1997.
24. Bhargava M, Cheung CY, Sabanayagam C, et al. Accuracy of diabetic retinopathy screening by trained non-physician graders using non-mydriatic fundus camera. Singapore Med J. 2012; 53 (11): 715-719.