Assessing eco-efficiency: A metafrontier directional distance function approach using life cycle analysis

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Volumn 63, Issue , 2017, Pages 116-127

  Beltrán Esteve, Mercedes ^a   Reig Martínez, Ernest ^a   Estruch Guitart, Vicent ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Directional distance function; Eco efficiency; Life cycle analysis; Metafrontier; Organic citrus farming

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; MANAGERS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

DIRECTIONAL DISTANCE FUNCTION; ECO-EFFICIENCY; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; METAFRONTIER; ORGANIC CITRUS FARMING;

LIFE CYCLE;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HEALTH IMPACT; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; ORGANIC FARMING; SUSTAINABILITY;

CITRUS;

EID: 85009205123     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Allen, K., DEA in the ecological context – an overview. Westermann, G., (eds.) Measuring the Efficiency in the Private and Public Service Sector, 1999, Gabler, Wiesbaden.
2. Arvanitoyannis, I.S., ISO 14040: life cycle assessment (LCA) – principles and guidelines. Arvanitoyannis, I.S., (eds.) Waste Management for the Food Industries, 2008, Academic Press, Amsterdam.
3. Audsley, E., Alber, S., Clift, R., Cowell, S., Crettaz, P., Gaillard, G., Hausheer, J., Jolliett, O., Kleijn, R., Mortensen, B., Pearce, D., Roger, E., Teulon, H., Weidema, B., van Zeijts, H., Harmonisation of Environmental Life Cycle Assessment for Agriculture. Final Report. Concerted Action AIR3-CT94-2028. European Commission, DG VI Agriculture. 1997.
4. Avadí, A., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Fréon, P., Eco-efficiency assessment of the Peruvian anchoveta steel and wooden fleets using the LCA + DEA framework. J. Clean. Prod. 70 (2014), 118–131.
5. Basset-Mens, C., van der Werf, H.M.G., Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 105:1–2 (2005), 127–144.
6. Beltrán-Esteve, M., Reig-Martínez, E., Comparing conventional and organic citrus grower efficiency in Spain. Agric. Syst. 129 (2014), 115–123.
7. Beltrán-Esteve, M., Picazo-Tadeo, A., Reig-Martínez, E., What makes a citrus farmer go organic? Empirical evidence from Spanish citrus farming. Span. J. Agric. Res. 10:4 (2012), 901–910.
8. Beltrán-Esteve, M., Gómez-Limón, J.A., Picazo-Tadeo, A.J., Reig-Martínez, E., A metafrontier directional distance function approach to assessing eco-efficiency. J. Prod. Anal. 41:1 (2014), 69–83.
9. Bentrup, F., Küsters, J., Lammel, J., Kuhlmann, H., Methods to estimate on-field nitrogen emissions from crop production as an input to LCA studies in the agricultural sector. Int. J. LCA 6 (2000), 349–357.
10. Bidstrup, M., Life cycle thinking in impact assessment—current practica and LCA gains. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 54 (2015), 72–79.
11. Catalan Office for Climate Change (Oficina Catalana de Canvi Climàtic), Guía práctica para el cálculo de emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero. Generalitat de Catalunya. 2013.
12. Chambers, R., Chung, Y., Färe, R., Profit, directional distance functions and Nerlovian efficiency. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 98:2 (1998), 351–364.
13. Chang, D., Lee, C.K.M., Chen, C.H., Review of life cycle assessment towards sustainable product development. J. Clean. Prod. 83 (2014), 48–60.
14. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978), 429–444.
15. Chen, C.M., Evaluating eco-efficiency with data envelopment analysis: an analytical reexamination. Ann. Oper. Res. 214 (2014), 49–71.
16. Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., van Puyenbroek, T., An introduction to ‘benefit of the doubt’ composite indicators. Soc. Indic. Res. 82:1 (2007), 111–145.
17. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Tone, K., Data Envelopment Analysis. A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. second ed., 2007, Springer US.
18. De Ponti, T., Rijk, B., van Ittersum, M.K., The crop yield gap between organic and conventional agriculture. Agric. Syst. 108 (2012), 1–9.
19. Domínguez-Gento, A., La citricultura ecológica. Servicio de Asesoramiento a los Agricultores y Ganaderos. Dirección General de Agricultura Ecológica, Consejería de Agricultura y Pesca de la Junta de Andalucía, Seville. 2008.
20. Dyckhoff, H., Allen, K., Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA). Eur. J. Oper. Res. 132 (2001), 312–325.
21. EC, EU Pesticides Database. 2013, DG SANCO, Brussels, Belgium http://ec.europa.eu/sanco_pesticides/public/?event=activesubstance.selection (Accessed 18th October 2013).
22. EEA, European Environment Agency, Integration of Environment into EU Agriculture Policy – The IRENA Indicator-Based Assessment Report, EEA Report 2/2006. Copenhagen. 2006.
23. EEA, European Environmental Agency, Agriculture and environment in EU-15 – the IRENA indicator Report. EEA Report 6/2005. Copenhagen. 2005.
24. Ekins, P., Eco-efficiency. Motives, drivers and economic implications. J. Ind. Ecol. 9:4 (2005), 12–14.
25. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Theory and applications of directional distance functions. J. Prod. Anal. 13:2 (2000), 93–103.
26. Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M.Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., Suh, S., Recent development in life cycle assessment. J. Environ. Manag. 91 (2009), 1–21.
27. Govindan, K., Sarkis, J., Jabbour, C.J.C., Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., Eco-efficiency based green supply chain management: current status and opportunities. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 233 (2014), 293–298.
28. Guinèe, J.B., Gorrée, M., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Kleijn, R., de Koning, A., van Oers, L., Wegener Sleeswijk, A., Suh, S., Udo de Haes, H.A., de Bruijn, H., van Duin, R., Huijbregts, M.A.J., Lindeijer, E., Roorda, A.A.H., Weidema, B.P., Life Cycle Assessment: An Operational Guide to the ISO Standards; Characterisation and Normalisation Factors. 2001.
29. Guinée, J.B., Gorrée, M., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Kleijn, R., de Koning, A., van Oers, L., Wegener, A., Suh, S., Udo de Haes, H.A., de Bruijn, H., van Duin, R., Huijbregts, M.A.J., Lindeijer, E., Roorda, A.A.H., van der Ven, B.L., Weidema, B.P., Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment. Operational Guide to the ISO Standards. 2004, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow.
30. Hayami, Y., Ruttan, V., Agricultural productivity differences among countries. Am. Econ. Rev. 60:5 (1970), 895–911.
31. Hoang, V.N., Alauddin, M., Input-orientated data envelopment analysis framework for measuring and decomposing economic, environmental and ecological efficiency: an application to OECD agriculture. Environ. Resour. Econ. 51 (2012), 431–452.
32. Huppes, G., Ishikawa, M., A framework for quantified eco-efficiency analysis. J. Ind. Ecol. 9:4 (2005), 25–41.
33. IPCC, Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. volume 4: agriculture, forestry and other land use. Chapter 11: N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application. Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K., (eds.) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2006, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama, Japan.
34. Iribarren, D., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Moreira, M.T., Feijoo, G., Further potentials in the joint implementation of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 408 (2010), 5265–5272.
35. Iribarren, D., Hospido, A., Moreira, M.T., Feijoo, G., Benchmarking environmental and operational parameters through eco-efficiency criteria for dairy farms. Sci. Total Environ. 409 (2011), 1786–1798.
36. Iribarren, D., Marvuglia, A., Hild, P., Guiton, M., Popovici, E., Benetto, E., Life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis approach for the selection of building components according to their environmental impact efficiency: a case study for external walls. J. Clean. Prod. 87 (2015), 707–716.
37. Ji, C., Hong, T., Comparative analysis of methods for integrating various environmental impacts as a single index in life cycle assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 57 (2016), 123–133.
38. Juliá, J.F., Server, R.J., Economic and Financial Comparison of Organic and Conventional Citrus-growing Systems, Study Prepared for the Horticultural Products Group, Tropical and Horticultural Products Service, Commodities and Trade Division. 2000, FAO, Rome.
39. Khoshnevisan, B., Bolandnazar, E., Shamshirband, S., Shariati, H.M., Anuar, N.B., Kiah, M.L.M., Decreasing environmental impacts of cropping systems using lifecycle assessment (LCA) and multi-objective genetic algorithm. J. Clean. Prod. 86 (2015), 67–77.
40. Kuosmanen, T., Measurement and analysis of eco-efficiency: an economist's perspective. J. Ind. Ecol. 9:4 (2005), 15–18.
41. Kuosmanen, T., Kortelainen, M., Measuring eco-efficiency of production with data envelopment analysis. J. Ind. Ecol. 9:4 (2005), 59–72.
42. Lorenzo-Toja, Y., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Chenel, S., Marín-Navarro, D., Moreira, M.T., Feijoo, G., Eco-efficiency analysis of Spanish WWTPs using the LCA + DEA method. Water Res. 68 (2015), 651–666.
43. Lozano, S., Iribarren, D., Moreira, M.T., Feijoo, G., The link between operational efficiency and environmental impacts. A joint application of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 407 (2009), 1744–1754.
44. Lozano, S., Iribarren, D., Moreira, M.T., Feijoo, G., Environmental impact efficiency in mussel cultivation. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 54:12 (2010), 1269–1277.
45. MARM-Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino, Estadísticas 2010 de agricultura ecológica. 2010 (Madrid).
46. McBean, C., The pesticide manual: a world compendium. McBean, C., (eds.) British Crop Protection Council, 2012, Surrey, UK.
47. Mohammadi, A., Rafiee, S., Jafari, A., Dalggard, T., Knudsen, M.T., Keyhani, A., Mousavi-Avval, S.H., Hermansen, J.E., Potential greenhouse gas emission reductions in soybean farming: a combined use of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 54 (2013), 89–100.
48. Mohammadi, A., Rafiee, S., Jafari, A., Keyhani, A., Dalgaard, T., Knudsen, M.T., Nguyen, T.L.T., Borek, R., Hermansen, J.E., Joint life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis for the benchmarking of environmental impacts in rice paddy production. J. Clean. Prod. 106 (2015), 521–532.
49. Mondelaers, K., Aertsens, J., van Huylenbroek, G., A meta-analysis of the differences in environmental impacts between organic and conventional farming. Br. Food J. 111 (2009), 1098–1119.
50. Nemecek, T., Kägi, T., Life cycle inventories of Swiss and European agricultural production systems. Final Report ecoinvent V2.0 No. 15a. Agrosope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Zurich and Düdendorf, Suiza, 2007.
51. NPIC, OSU Extension Pesticide Properties Database. 2013, National Pesticide Information Center, Oregon State University, Oregon (USA) http://npic.orst.edu/ingred/ppdmove.htm (Accessed 18th October 2013).
52. O'Donnell, C.J., Prasada, D.S., Battese, G.E., Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Empir. Econ. 34 (2008), 231–255.
53. OECD, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, OECD Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews. A synthesis report by the Group on the State of the Environment, Environment Monograph 83. Paris. 1993.
54. OECD, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Eco-efficiency. Paris. 1998.
55. OECD, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Environmental indicators for agriculture. Concepts and Framework, 1, 1999 (Paris).
56. OECD, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Environmental indicators for agriculture. Issues and Design, 2, 1999 (Paris).
57. OECD, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Environmental indicators for agriculture. Methods and Results, 3, 2001 (Paris).
58. Offermann, F., Nieberg, H., Economic Performance of Organic Farms in Europe, Organic Farming in Europe: Economics and Policy. 5, 2000, University of Hohenheim, Department of Farm Economics, Stuttgart.
59. Patyk, A., Reinhardt, G., Düngemittel-Energie-und Stoffstromsbilanzen. 1997, Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Publishers, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden, Germany.
60. Peris, E.M., Juliá, J.F., Production costs of the organic Clementine crop in the region of Valencia (Spain). Span. J. Agric. Res. 4:1 (2006), 17–25.
61. Peris, E.M., Juliá, J.F., Balasch, S., Estudio de las diferencias de costes de producción del cultivo de naranjo convencional, ecológico e integrado en la Comunidad Valenciana mediante el análisis factorial discriminante. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales 5:10 (2005), 69–87.
62. Picazo-Tadeo, A.J., Beltrán-Esteve, M., Gómez-Limón, J.A., Assessing eco-efficiency with directional distance functions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 220:3 (2012), 798–809.
63. Porcuna, J.L., Gaude, M.I., Castejón, P., Domínguez, A., Guía de agricultura ecológica de cítricos. 2010, Proyecto Mayas. Federación de Cooperativas Agrarias de la Comunidad Valenciana, Valencia, Spain.
64. Power, A.G., Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philos. T Roy. Soc. B 365 (2010), 2959–2971.
65. Pretty, J., Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence. Philos. T Roy. Soc. B 363 (2008), 447–465.
66. Pryshlakivsky, J., Searcy, C., Fifteen years of ISO 14040: a review. J. Clean. Prod. 57 (2013), 115–123.
67. Rao, N.H., Rogers, P.P., Assessment of agricultural sustainability. Curr. Sci. India 91:4 (2006), 439–448.
68. Rigby, D., Howlett, D., Woodhouse, P., A review of indicators of agricultural and rural livelihood sustainability. Working Paper 1, 2000, Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester.
69. Rosenbaum, R.K., Bachmann, T.M., Gold, L.S., Huijbregts, M.A.J., Jolliet, O., Juraske, R., Koehler, A., Larsen, H.F., MacLeod, M., Margni, M., McKone, T.E., Payet, J., Schuhmacher, M., van de Meent, D., Hauschild, M.Z., USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 13:7 (2008), 532–546.
70. Rüdenauer, I., Gensch, C.O., Griebhammer, R., Bunke, D., Integrated environmental and economic assessment of product and processes. A method for eco-efficiency analysis. J. Ind. Ecol. 9:4 (2005), 105–116.
71. Sanjuán, N., Ribal, J., Clemente, G., Fenollosa, M.L., Measuring and improving eco-efficiency using data envelopment analysis. J. Ind. Ecol. 15:4 (2011), 614–628.
72. Smyth, A., Dumanski, J., FESLM: An International Framework for Evaluating Sustainable Land Management, World Soil Resources Report 73. Land and Water Development Division. 1993, FAO, Rome.
73. Swinton, S.M., Lupi, F., Robertson, G.P., Hamilton, S.K., Ecosystem services and agriculture. Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefit. Ecol. Econ. 64:2 (2007), 245–252.
74. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Ecoinvent 2.1. Switzerland. http://www.ecoinvent.org/database, 2014 (accessed 25th of May 2014).
75. Tuomisto, H.L., Hodge, I.D., Riordan, P., Macdonald, D.W., Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts – a meta-analysis of European research. J. Environ. Manag. 112 (2012), 309–320.
76. UH, Pesticide Footprint Database. 2013, University of Hertfordshire, UK http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/footprint/index2.htm (Accessed 25th May 2014).
77. USEtox, The USEtox model. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, Task Force on Toxic Impacts. 2013, USEtox Team.
78. van Cauwenbergh, N., Biala, K., Bielders, C., Brouckaert, V., Franchois, L., García Cidad, V., Hermy, M., Mathijs, E., Muys, B., Reijnders, J., Sauvenier, X., Valckx, J., Vanclooster, M., van der Veken, B., Wauters, E., Peeters, A., SAFE – a hierarchical framework for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 120(2–4), 2007, 229242.
79. Van Passel, S., Meul, M., Multilevel and multi-user sustainability assessment of farming systems. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 32 (2012), 170–180.
80. Vázquez-Rowe, I., Iribarren, D., Moreira, M.T., Feijoo, G., Combined application of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis as a methodological approach for the assessment of fisheries. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 15 (2010), 272–283.
81. Vázquez-Rowe, I., Villanueva-Rey, P., Iribarren, D., Moreira, M.T., Feijoo, G., Joint life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis of grape production for vinification in the Rías Baixas appellation (NW Spain). J. Clean. Prod. 27 (2012), 92–102.
82. WBCSD, World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Eco-Efficiency – Creating More Value with Less Impact. Geneve. 2000.
83. Zhang, N., Choi, Y., A note on the evolution of directional distance function and its development in energy and environmental studies 1997–2013. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 33 (2014), 50–59.
84. Zhang, W., Ricketts, T.H., Kremen, C., Carney, K., Swinton, S.M., Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecol. Econ. 64:2 (2007), 253–260.
85. Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., Poh, K.L., A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 189 (2008), 1–18.
86. Zhu, Z., Wang, K., Zhang, B., Applying a network data envelopment analysis model to quantify the eco-efficiency of products: a case study of pesticides. J. Clean. Prod. 69 (2014), 67–73.