Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning

Computers and Education

Volumn 107, Issue , 2017, Pages 91-99

  Heflin, Houston ^a   Shewmaker, Jennifer ^a   Nguyen, Jessica ^a  

^a ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Media in education; Mobile technology; Pedagogy; Student engagement

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; EDUCATION; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; MOBILE DEVICES; TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT;

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; MEDIA IN EDUCATION; MOBILE TECHNOLOGY; PEDAGOGY; STUDENT ENGAGEMENT;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85009101099     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. AlKandari, N., Students’ communication and positive outcomes in college classrooms. Education 133:1 (2012), 19–30.
2. Bellur, S., Nowak, K., Hull, K., Make it our time: In class multitaskers have lower academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior 53 (2015), 63–70.
3. Berman, R.A., Engaging students requires a renewed focus on teaching. Chronicle of Higher Education 61:3 (2014), 28–30.
4. Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., Krathwohl, D., Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. 1956, Longmans, Green, New York, Toronto.
5. Brame, C.J., Biel, R., Setting up and facilitating group work: Using cooperative learning groups effectively. 2015 Retrieved [1/2015] from http://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/setting-up-and-facilitating-group-work-using-cooperative-learning-groups-effectively/.
6. Cheng, P., Yang, Y.C., Chang, S.G., Kuo, F.R., 5E Mobile inquiry learning approach for enhancing learning motivation and scientific inquiry ability of university students. IEEE Transactions On Education 59:2 (2016), 147–153, 10.1109/TE.2015.2467352.
7. Cole, P.G., Chan, L.K.S., Teaching principles and practice. 2nd ed., 1994, Prentice Hall, New York, NY.
8. Denker, K.J., Student response systems and facilitating the large lecture basic communication course; Assessing engagement and learning. Communication Teacher 27:1 (2013), 50–69.
9. Dietz, S., Henrich, C., Texting as a distraction to learning in college students. Computers in Human Behavior 36 (2014), 163–167.
10. Dunn, P., Richardson, A., Oprescu, F., McDonald, C., Mobile-phone-based classroom response systems: Students’ perceptions of engagement and learning in a large undergraduate course. International Journal Of Mathematical Education In Science And Technology 44:8 (2013), 1160–1174, 10.1080/0020739X.2012.756548.
11. Eppard, J., Nasser, O., Reddy, P., The next generation of technology: Mobile apps in the English language classroom. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning 11:4 (2016), 21–27.
12. Fink, L.D., Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. 2003, Jossey-Bass, New York, NY.
13. Gay, G., Rieger, R., Bennington, T., Using mobile computing to enhance field study. Koschmann, T., Hall, R., Miyake, N., (eds.) CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation, 2002, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 507–528.
14. Hamann, K., Pollock, P.H., Wilson, B.M., Assessing student perceptions of the benefits of discussions in small-group, large-class, and online learning contexts. College Teaching 60:2 (2012), 65–75.
15. Hamm, S., Saltsman, G., Jones, B., Baldridge, S., Perkins, S., A mobile pedagogy approach for transforming learners and faculty. Berge, Zane, Muilenburg, Lin, (eds.) Handbook of mobile education, 2013, Routledge, New York, NY.
16. Henrie, C.R., Halverson, L.R., Graham, C.R., Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 2015, 9036–9053, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005.
17. Hsu, Y.-C., Ching, Y.-H., Mobile computer-supported collaborative learning: A review of experimental research. British Journal of Educational Technology 44:5 (2013), 111–114.
18. Jeng, Y.-L., et al. The add-on impact of mobile applications in learning strategies: A review study. Educational Technology & Society 13:3 (2010), 3–11.
19. Jones, S.J., Crandall, J., Vogler, J.S., Robinson, D.H., Classroom response systems facilitate student accountability, readiness, and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research 49:2 (2013), 155–171.
20. Junco, R., In-class multitasking and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior 28 (2012), 2236–2243.
21. Junco, R., Heiberger, G., Loken, E., The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal Of Computer Assisted Learning 27:2 (2011), 119–132, 10.1111/j.1365–2729.2010.00387.x.
22. Khaddage, F., Muller, W., Flintoff, K., Advancing mobile learning in formal and informal settings via mobile app technology: Where to from here, and how?. Educational Technology & Society 19:3 (2016), 16–26.
23. Kuh, G.D., The national study of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research 141 (2009), 5–20.
24. Lai, C.-Y., Wu, C.-C., Using handhelds in a jigsaw cooperative learning environment. Journal of Computer and Assisted Learning 22 (2006), 284–297.
25. Lane, E.S., Harris, S.E., A new tool for Measuring student behavioral engagement in large university classes. Journal Of College Science Teaching 44:6 (2015), 83–91.
26. Lippmann, S., Facilitating class sessions for ego-piercing engagement. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 135 (2013), 43–48.
27. Lumpkin, A., Achen, R.M., Dodd, R.K., Student perceptions of active learning. College Student Journal 49:1 (2015), 121–133.
28. O'Connor, K.J., Class participation: Promoting in-class student engagement. Education 133:3 (2013), 340–344.
29. Park, Y., A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12:2 (2011), 78–102.
30. Peters, K., M-learning: Positioning educators for a mobile, connected future. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 8:2 (2007), 1–17.
31. Ravizza, S., Hambrick, D., Fenn, K., Non-academic internet use in the classroom is negatively related to classroom learning regardless of intellectual ability. Computers & Education 78 (2014), 109–114.
32. Rocca, K.A., Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review. Communication Education 59:2 (2010), 185–213.
33. Sana, F., Weston, T., Cepeda, N.J., Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers and Education 62 (2013), 24–31.
34. Sung, Y.-T., Change, K.-E., Liu, T.-C., The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computer and Education 94 (2016), 252–275.
35. Ting, Y.-L., The pitfalls of mobile devices in learning: A different view and implications for pedagogical design. Journal of Educational Computing Research 46:2 (2012), 119–134.
36. Wu, W.-H., et al. Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education 59 (2012), 817–827.