Legal pressure, treatment readiness, and engagement in long-term residential programs

Journal of Offender Rehabilitation

Volumn 31, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 101-115

  Knight, Kevin ^a   Hiller, Matthew L ^a   Broome, Kirk M ^a   Simpson, D Dwayne ^a  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Legal pressure; Treatment motivation; Treatment retention

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008828879     PISSN: 10509674     EISSN: 15408558     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J076v31n01_07     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anglin, M. D., Brecht, M. L., & Maddahian, E. (1989). Pretreatment characteristics and treatment performance of legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance admissions. Criminology, 27 (3), 537-557.
2. Anglin, M. D., & Hser, Y. (1990). Legal coercion and drug abuse treatment: Research findings and social policy implications. In J. A. Inciardi & J. R. Biden, Jr. (Eds.), Handbook of drug control in the United States. New York: Greenwood Press.
3. Anglin, M. D., & Hser, Y. (1991). Criminal justice and the drug-abusing offender: Policy issues of coerced treatment. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 9 (3), 243-267.
4. Anglin, M. D., Longshore, D., Turner, S., McBride, D., Inciardi, J., & Prender-gast, M. (1996). Study of the functioning and effectiveness of treatment alternatives to street crime (TAC) programs: Final report. Los Angeles: UCLA Drug abuse Research Center.
5. Brecht, M. L., Anglin, M. D., & Wang, J. C. (1993). Treatment effectiveness for legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance clients. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 19, 89-106.
6. Broome, K. M., Knight, D. K., Knight, K., Hiller, M. L. & Simpson, D. D. (1997). Peer, family, and motivational influences on drug treatment process and recidivism for probationers, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 387-397.
7. Broome, K. M., Knight, D. K., Knight, K., Hiller, M. L. & Simpson, D. D. (1997). Peer, family, and motivational influences on drug treatment process and recidivism for probationers, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 387-397.
8. Bryk, A., & Raudenbush, S. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Bryk, A., Raudenbush, S., & Congdon, R. (1996). Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L programs. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
10. Collins, J. J., & Allison, M. (1983). Legal coercion and retention in drug abuse treatment. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 34 (12), 1145-1149.
11. Craddock, S. G., Rounds-Bryant, J. L., Flynn, P. M., & Hubbard, R. L. (1997). Characteristics and pretreatment behaviors of clients entering drug abuse treatment: 1969 to 1993. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 23, 43-59.
12. De Leon, G. (1988). Legal pressure in therapeutic communities. Journal of Drug Issues, 19 (4), 625-640.
13. De Leon, G. (1996). Integrative recovery: A stage paradigm. Substance Abuse, 17, 51-63.
14. De Leon, G., & Jainchill, N. (1986). Circumstance, motivation, readiness, and suitability as correlates of treatment tenure. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 18 (3), 203-208.
15. De Leon, G., Melnick, G., Kressel, D., & Jainchill, N. (1994). Circumstances, motivation, readiness, and suitability (CMRS scales): Predicting retention in therapeutic community treatment. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 20, 495-515.
16. Flynn, P. M., Craddock, S. G., Hubbard, R. L., Anderson, J., & Etheridge, R. M. (1997). Methodological overview and research design for the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11 (4), 230-243.
17. Gossop, M. (in press). Treatment retention and one year outcomes for residential programs in England. Drug and Alcohol Dependence.
18. Harford, R. J., Ungerer, J. C., & Kinsella, J. K. (1976). Effects of legal pressure on prognosis for treatment of drug dependence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 133,1399-1404.
19. Hiller, M. L., Knight, K., Broome, K. M., & Simpson, D. D. (1998). Legal pressure and treatment retention in a national sample of long-term residential programs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25 (4), 463-481.
20. Hubbard, R. L., Marsden, M. E., Rachal, J. V., Harwood, H. J., Cavanaugh, E. R., & Genzburg, H. M. (1989). Drug abuse treatment: A national study ofeffec-tiveness. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
21. Joe, G. W., & Simpson, D. D. (1976). Treatment retention for drug users: 1972-1973 DARP admissions. In S. B. Sells & D. D. Simpson (Eds.), The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: Vol. 5. Evaluation of treatment outcomes for 1972-1973 DARP admission cohort (pp. 167-228). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.
22. Joe, G. W., Simpson, D. D., & Broome, K. M. (1998). Effects of readiness for drug abuse treatment on client retention and assessment of process. Addiction, 93 (8) 1177-1190.
23. Joe, G. W., Simpson, D. D., & Broome, K. M. (in press). Retention and patient engagement models for different treatment modalities in DATOS. Drug and Alcohol Dependence.
24. Margolin, A., Avants, S. K., Rounsaville, B., Kosten, T. R., & Schottenfeld, R. S. (1997). Motivational factors in cocaine pharmacotherapy trials with methadone-maintained patients: Problems and paradoxes. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 29, 205-212.
25. Marlowe, D. B., Glass, D. J., Merikle, E. P., Festinger, D. S., DeMatteo, D. S., Marczyk, G. R., & Platt, J. J. (in press). Efficacy of coercion in substance abuse treatment. In F. Tims, C. Leukefeld, & J. J. Platt (Eds.), Relapse and recovery in the addiction. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26. Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
27. Simpson, D. D. (1981). Treatment for drug abuse: Follow-up outcomes and length of time spent. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 875-880.
28. Simpson, D. D., & Joe, G. W. (1993). Motivation as a predictor of early dropout from drug abuse treatment. Psychotherapy, 30, 357-368.
29. Simpson, D. D., Joe, G. W., Broome, K. M., Hiller, M. L., Knight, K., & Rowan-Szal, G. A. (1997). Program diversity and treatment retention rates in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11 (4), 279-293.
30. Simpson, D. D., Joe, G. W., & Brown, B. (1997). Treatment retention and followup outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology ofAddictive Behaviors, 11 (4), 294-307.
31. Simpson, D. D., Joe, G. W., & Rowan-Szal, G. A. (1997). Drug abuse treatment retention and process effects on follow-up outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 47, 227-235.
32. Simpson, D. D., Joe, G. W., Rowan-Szal, G. A., & Greener, J. M. (1997). Drug abuse treatment process components that improve retention. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 14, 565-572.
33. Vickers-Lahti, M., Garfield, F., McCusker, J., Hindin, R., Bigelow, C., Love, C., & Lewis, B. (1995). The relationship between legal factors and attrition from a residential drug abuse treatment program. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 27, 17-25.
34. Wild, T. C., Newton-Taylor, B., & Alletto, R. (1998). Perceived coercion among clients entering substance abuse treatment: Structural and psychological determinants. Addictive Behaviors, 23 (1), 81-95.