Methodological overview and research design for the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS)

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 230-243

  Flynn, Patrick M ^a   Craddock, S Gail ^a   Hubbard, Robert L ^a   Anderson, Jill ^a   Etheridge, Rose M ^a  

^a NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0031454561     PISSN: 0893164X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0893-164X.11.4.230     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Adair, E. B., Craddock, S. G., Miller, H. G., & Turner, C. F. (1995). Assessing consistency of responses to questions on cocaine use. Addiction, 90, 1497-1502.
2. Adair, E. B., Craddock, S. G., Miller, H. G., & Turner, C. F. (1996). Quality of treatment data: Reliability over time of self-reports given by clients in treatment for substance abuse. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 13, 145-149.
3. American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
4. Anglin, M. D., & Hser, Y. I. (1990). Treatment of drug abuse. In M. Tonry & J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Drugs and crime (pp. 393-460). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Anglin, M. D., & McGlothlin, W. H. (1984). Outcome of narcotic addict treatment in California. In F. Tims & J. Ludford (Eds.), Drug abuse treatment evaluation strategies, progress, and prospects (NIDA Research Monograph 51, DHHS Publication No. ADM 84-1349, pp. 106-128). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
6. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
7. Craddock, S. G., Bray, R. M., & Hubbard, R. L. (1985). Drug use before and during drug abuse treatment: 1979-1981 TOPS admission cohorts (DHHS Publication No. ADM 85-1387). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
8. Craddock, S. G., Flynn, P. M., & Hubbard, R. L. (1995, February). Selected characteristics of clients with specific drug use patterns in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study. Paper presented at the 5th Annual Conference of the North Carolina Governor's Institute on Alcohol and Substance Abuse, Greensboro, NC.
9. Craddock, S. G., Rounds-Bryant, J. L., Flynn, P. M., & Hubbard, R. L. (1997). Characteristics and pretreatment behaviors of clients entering drug-abuse treatment: 1969 to 1993. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 23, 43-59.
10. D'Aunno, T., & Vaughn, T. E. (1995). An organizational analysis of service patterns in outpatient drug abuse treatment units. Journal of Substance Abuse, 7, 27-42.
11. Derogatis, L. R. (1977). SCL-90 administration: Scoring and procedures manual. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Universityy Press.
12. Etheridge, R. M., Craddock, S. G., Dunteman, G. H., & Hubbard, R. L. (1995). Treatment services in two national studies of community-based drug abuse treatment programs. Journal of Substance Abuse, 7, 9-26.
13. Flynn, P. M., Craddock, S. G., Luckey, J. W., Hubbard, R. L., & Dunteman, G. H. (1996). Comorbidity of antisocial personality and mood disorders among psychoactive substance-dependent treatment clients. Journal of Personality Disorders, 10, 56-67.
14. Gough, H. G. (1975). California Psychological Inventory manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
15. Horton, A. M., Jr. (1993). Future directions in the development of addiction assessment instruments. In B. J. Rounsaville, F. M. Tims, A. M. Horton, Jr., & B. J. Sowder (Eds.), Diagnostic source book on drug abuse research and treatment (NIH Publication No. 93-3508, pp. 87-92). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
16. Hubbard, R. L., Flynn, P. M., & Etheridge, R. M. (1993, August). Prospective cohort designs: The Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study. Paper presented at the 101st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
17. Hubbard, R. L., Marsden, M. E., Rachal, J. V., Harwood, H. J., Cavanaugh, E. R., & Ginzburg, H. M. (1989). Drug abuse treatment: A national study of effectiveness. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
18. McGlothlin, W. H., Anglin, M. D., & Wilson, B. D. (1977). An evaluation of the California Civil Addict Program (DHEW Publication No. ADM 78-558). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
19. McLellan, A. T., Luborsky, L. K., Woody, G. E., & O'Brien, C. P. (1980). An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: The Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 168, 26-33.
20. Price, R. H., Burke, A. C., D'Aunno, T., Klingel, D. M., McCaughrin, W. C., Rafferty, J. A., & Vaughn, T. E. (1991). Outpatient drug abuse treatment services, 1988: Results of a national survey. In R. W. Pickens, C. G. Leukefeld, & C. R. Schuster (Eds.), Improving drug abuse treatment (Research Monograph No. 106). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
21. Reitan, R. M. (1958). Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8, 271-276.