Drug abuse treatment retention and process effects on follow-up outcomes

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 227-235

  Simpson, D Dwayne ^a   Joe, George W ^a   Rowan Szal, Grace A ^a  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Follow up outcomes; Methadone maintenance; Motivation; Treatment process; Treatment retention

Indexed keywords

METHADONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METHADONE TREATMENT; MOTIVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; COCAINE; CRIME; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; METHADONE; MOTIVATION; OPIOID-RELATED DISORDERS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT DROPOUTS; SUBSTANCE ABUSE DETECTION; SUBSTANCE ABUSE, INTRAVENOUS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TEXAS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0342601416     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-8716(97)00099-9     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anglin, M.D., Hser, Y.I., 1990. Treatment of drug abuse. In: Tonry, M., Wilson, J.Q. (Eds.), Drugs and Crime. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 393-460.
2. Bartholomew, N., Rowan-Szal, G.A., Chatham, L.R., Simpson, D.D., 1994. Effectiveness of a specialized intervention for women in a methadone program. J. Psychoact. Drugs. 26 (3), 249-255.
3. Cohen, J., 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
4. Cooper, J.R., 1992. Ineffective use of psychoactive drugs: methadone treatment is no exception. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 267 (2), 281-282.
5. Dansereau, D.F., Dees, S.M., Greener, J., Simpson, D.D., 1995. Node-link mapping and the evaluation of drug abuse counseling sessions. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 9 (3), 195-203.
6. Dansereau, D.F., Joe, G.W., Simpson, D.D., 1993. Node-link mapping: a visual representation strategy for enhancing drug abuse counseling. J. Counsel. Psychol. 40 (4), 385-395.
7. D'Aunno, T., Vaughn, T.E., 1992. Variations in methadone treatment in practices: results from a national study. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 267 (2), 253-258.
8. De Leon, G., 1991. Retention in drug-free therapeutic communities. In: Pickens, R.W., Leukefeld, G.G., Schuster, C.R. (Eds.), Improving Drug Abuse Treatment (NIDA Research Monograph 106, DHHS Publication No. ADM 91-1754). National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD.
9. Desmond, D.P., Maddux, J.F., 1996. Compulsory supervision and methadone maintenance. J. Substance Abuse Treatment 13 (1), 79-83.
10. Etheridge, R., Craddock, S., Dunteman, G., Hubbard, R., 1995. Treatment services in two national studies of community-based drug abuse treatment programs. J. Substance Abuse 7 (1), 9-26.
11. Gerstein, D.R., Harwood, H.J., 1990. Treating Drug Problems, vol. 1. A study of the evolution, effectiveness, and financing of public and private drug treatment systems. In: Gerstein, D.R., Harwood, H.J. (Eds.), Committee for the Substance Abuse Coverage Study Division of Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
12. Goubert, D., McKay, J.R., Burke, M., McLellan, A.T., Randall, M., Alterman, A.I., 1996. Treatment program progress: reliability and predictive validity of the treatment program progress rating scale. Am. J. Addict. 5 (2), 174-180.
13. Hiller, M.L., Simpson, D.D., Broome, K.M., Joe, G.W., (1997). Legal status at intake and posttreatment incarceration: 12-month follow-up of methadone treatment, manuscript submitted for publication.
14. Hser, Y., Anglin, M.D., Chou, C., 1988. Evaluation of drug abuse treatment: A repeated measures design assessing methadone maintenance. Evaluation Rev. 12 (5), 547-570.
15. Hubbard, R.L., Marsden, M.E., Rachal, J.V., Harwood, H.J., Cavanaugh, E.R., Ginzburg, H.M., 1989. Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness. University North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
16. Marshall, G.N., Hays, R.D., Mazel, R., 1996. Health status and satisfaction with health care: results from the medical outcomes study. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 64 (2), 380-390.
17. McLellan, A.T., Woody, G.E., Metzger, D., McKay, J., Durell, J., Alterman, A.I., O'Brien, C.P., 1996. Evaluating the effectiveness of addiction treatments: reasonable expectations, appropriate comparisons. Milbank Q. 74 (1), 51-85.
18. Price, R., 1997. What we know and what we actually do: Prevalence of best practices in substance abuse treatment. In: Egertson, J.A., Fox, D.M., Leshner, A.I. (Eds.), Treating Drug Abusers Effectively. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers of North America, pp. 125-155.
19. Rowan-Szal, G.A., Joe, G.W., Chatham, L.R., Simpson, D.D., 1994. A simple reinforcement system for methadone clients in a community-based treatment program. J. Substance Abuse Treatment 11 (3), 217-223.
20. Rowan-Szal, G.A., Joe, G.W., Hiller, M.L., Simpson, D.D., 1997. Increasing early engagement in methadone treatment. J. Maintenance Addict. 1 (1), 49-61.
21. Simpson, D.D., 1981. Treatment for drug abuse: follow-up outcomes and length of time spent. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 38 (8), 875-880.
22. Simpson, D.D., 1992. TCU/DATAR forms manual: Drug Abuse Treatment for AIDS-Risk Reduction. Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research, Fort Worth, TX.
23. Simpson, D.D., 1997. Effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: a review of research from field settings. In: Egertson, J.A., Fox, D.M., Leshner, A.I. (Eds.), Treating Drug Abusers Effectively. Blackwell Publishers of North America, Cambridge, MA, pp. 41-73.
24. Simpson, D.D., Joe, G.W., Bracy, S.A., 1982. Six-year follow-up of opioid addicts after admission to treatment. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 39 (11), 1318-1323.
25. Simpson, D.D., Joe, G.W., Rowan-Szal, G.A., Greener, J., 1995. Client engagement and change during drug abuse treatment. J. Substance Abuse 7 (1), 117-134.
26. Simpson, D.D., Dansereau, D.F., Joe, G.W., 1997a. The DATAR project: Cognitive and behavioral enhancements to community-based treatments. In: Tims, F.M., Inciardi, J.A., Fletcher, B.W., Horton, A.M. Jr. (Eds.), The Effectiveness of Innovative Approaches in the Treatment of Drug Abuse. Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, pp. 182-203.
27. Simpson, D.D., Joe, G.W., Dansereau, D.F., Chatham, L.R., 1997b. Strategies for improving methadone treatment process and outcomes. Journal of Drug Issues 2 (2), 239-260.
28. Simpson, D.D., Joe, G.W., Rowan-Szal, G.A., Greener, J., (in press). Drug abuse treatment process components that improve retention, J. Substance Abuse Treatment.
29. Simpson, D.D., Joe, G.W., 1993. Motivation as a predictor of early dropout from drug abuse treatment. Psychother. 30 (2), 357-368.
30. Simpson, D.D., Sells, S.B., 1982. Effectiveness of treatment for drug abuse: an overview of the DARP research program. Adv. Alcohol Substance Abuse 2 (1), 7-29.
31. Simpson, D.D., Sells, S.B., 1990. Opioid addiction and treatment: A 12-year follow-up. In: Simpson, D.D., Sells, S.B. (Eds.), Krieger, Malabar, FL.
32. Stark, M.J., 1992. Dropping out of substance abuse treatment: a clinically oriented review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 12, 93-116.
33. Tims, F.M., Inciardi, J.A., Fletcher, B.W., Horton, A.M. Jr., 1997. The effectiveness of innovative approaches in the treatment of drug abuse. In: Tims, F.M., Inciardi, J.A., Fletcher, B.W., Horton, A.M. Jr. (Eds.), Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.
34. Turner, S., Petersilia, J., 1992. Focusing on high-risk parolees: an experiment to reduce commitments to the Texas Department of Corrections. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 29 (1), 34-61.