The nature of authentic professional development during curriculum-based telecomputing

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 379-398

  Abbott, Lynda ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Educational telecomputing; Instructional change; Professional development; Teacher perceptions

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008823487     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2005.10782444     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Becker, H. & Ravitz, J. (1999). The influence of computer and Internet use on teachers’ pedagogical practices and perceptions. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 356-384.
2. Becker, H. (1999). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology & Organizations. Available: http://www.tcrecord.org/PrintIdKw-Param.asp?@IdNumber=10477.
3. Bennett, F. (1999). Computers as tutors: Solving the crisis in education. Sarasota, FL: Faben Inc. Publishers.
4. Cadiero-Kaplan, K. (1999). Integrating technology: Issues for traditional and constructivist pedagogies. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 15(2), 14-18.
5. Calderhead, J. (1990). Conceptualizing and evaluating teachers’ professional learning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 13(3), 153-159.
6. Campoy, R. (1992). The role of technology in the school reform movement. Educational Technology, 32(8), 17-22.
7. Charon, J. (2001). Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, and integration. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. Collins, A. (1991). The role of computer technology in restructuring schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 28-36.
9. Cravens, J. (2003). Effective practice: Creating a successful online mentoring program. The Resource Center, Corporation for National Community Service. Retrieved April 10, 2005 from http://epicenter.nationalserviceresources.org/index. taf?_function=practice&show=summary&Layout_0_uidl=33488.
10. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. St. Leonards, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
11. Dexter, S., Anderson, R., & Becker, H. (1999). Teachers’ views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(3), 221-239.
12. Diamond, C. (1991). Teacher education as transformation: A psychological perspective. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
13. Dickey, E., & Roblyer, M. (1997). Technology, NAEP, andTIMSS: How does technology influence our national and international report cards? Learning and Leading with Technology, 25(3), 55-57.
14. Dockstader, J. (1999) Teachers of the 21st century know the what, why, and how of technology integration. T.H.E. Journal, 26(6), 73-74.
15. Erlandson, D., Harris, E., Skipper, B., & Allen, S. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
16. Geetz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward and interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3-30). New York: Basic Books.
17. Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. (1998). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, (Vol. 1: The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. pp. 195-220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18. Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2000). Analyzing interpretive practice. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 487-508). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. Toronto, ON: OISE Press.
20. Harris, J. (1998). Curriculum-based telecollaboration. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26(1), 6-15. Available: http://virtual-architecture.wm.edu/Foundation/Articles/Structures.pdf.
21. Harris, J., & Grandgenett, N. (2002). Teachers’ authentic learning with e-learning. Learning and LeadingWith Technology, 30(3), 54-58.
22. Idaho Council for Technology in Learning. (1999). The Idaho technology initiative: An accountability report to the Idaho Legislature on the effect of monies spent through the Idaho Council for Technology in Learning. Boise, ID: The State Department of Education. Available: http://www.sde.state.id.us/bots/docs/Reports/ITIAccRep02-22-01.pdf.
23. International Education and Resource Network. (2005). News: Awards. Retrieved April 11, 2005 from http://www.iearn.org/news/news_whatisnew.html.
24. KidLink. (2001). Awards. Retrieved April 11, 2005 from http://www.kidlink. org/support/www/awards.
25. Kleiman, M. G. (2000). Myths and realities about technology in K-12 schools. The Center for Online Professional Education, Education Development Center, Inc. Available: http://www2.edc.org/LNT/news/Issuel4/featurel.htm.
26. Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (1991). Revisiting the social realities of teaching. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Staff development for education in the '90s (pp. 92-109). New York: Teachers College Press.
27. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
28. Love, R, & McVey, M. (2000). Teachers’ use of the Internet. Teachers’ College Record. Available: http://www.tcrecord.org/PrintIdKwParam.asp?IdNumber= 10538.
29. Martin, C. K. (Ed.). (1998). Online global collaborative projects. Stanford University. Retrieved April 11, 2005 from http://bermuda.stanford.edu/resources/projects.html.
30. McGee, P. (1997). Collaboration and unintentional teacher learning in telementoring contexts. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at Austin.
31. McGee, P. (1998). Unintended professional development in curriculum-based K-12 telementoring projects. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, 1998). UMI: AAT 9838045
32. Means, B., Blando, J., Olson, K., Middleton, T., Morocco, C. C., Remz, A. R., & Zorfass, J. (1993). Using technology to support education reform. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
33. Mergendoller, J. (2000). Technology and learning: A critical assessment. Principal, 79(3), 5-9.
34. National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2003). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994-2002. Available: http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/frss/publications/2004011/2.asp.
35. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
36. Philips, G. (Ed.) (1994). The Internet: The national information infrastructure [Symposium]. Communication Education, 43(4), 71-193.
37. Riley, R. W. (1999, February 16). New challenges, a new resolve: Moving American education into the 21st century. The Sixth Annual State of American Education Speech, Long Beach, CA. Available: http://www.ed.gov/Speeches/02-1999/9902l6.html.
38. Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
39. Ryan, G. W. & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 769-802). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
40. Schwandt, T. (1997). Qualitative inquiry: A dictionary of terms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
41. Schwandt, T. (1998). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (pp. 221-259). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
42. Schwandt, T. (1999). On understanding understanding. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(4), 451-464.
43. ServiceLeader.org. (2000). E-mentoring/Online mentoring/Telementoring resources. RGK Center for Philanthropy and Community Service at the Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs of the University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved April 11, 2005 from http://www.serviceleader.org/old/schools/telem.html.
44. Stockholm Challenge. (2001). Stockholm Challenge Award2001. Category: Education. Retrieved April 11, 2005 from http://www.stockholmchallenge.se/projects.asp?Projectld=15.
45. “Top Ten Innovative Projects.” (2003). Technology & Learning, 24(4). Available: http://www.techlearning.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=16000694
46. Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Available: http://ftp.ets.org/pub/res/technolog.pdf.