Teachers’ instructional choices with student-created digital documentaries: Case studies

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 223-245

  Manfra, Meghan Mcglinn ^a   Hammond, Thomas C ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LEHIGH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital documentaries; Digital history; Social studies; Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008796766     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2008.10782530     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ayers, E. (1999). The pasts and futures of digital history. Virginia Center for Digital History. Retrieved February 28, 2007, from http://www.vcdh.virginia.edu/PastsFutures.html
2. Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2003). Why don’t history teachers engage students in interpretation? Social Education, 67(6), 358-61.
3. Brush, T. A., & Saye, J. W (2002). A summary of research exploring hard and soft scaffolding for teachers using a multimedia supported learning environment. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1-12.
4. Clarke, W., & Lee, J. (2004). The promise of digital history. The Clearing House, 78(2), 84-87.
5. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside and outside: Teacher research and knowledge. NY: Teachers College Press.
6. Crocco, M. S. (2001), Leveraging constructivist learning in the social studies classroom: A response to Mason, Berson, Diem, Hicks, Lee, and Dralle. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, [Online serial], 1(3). Available at http://www.citejournal.org/vol1/iss3/currentissues/socialstudies/article2.htm
7. Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D. (2005). How students learn: History, math-ematics, and science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
8. Doolittle, P. E. (2001). The need to leverage theory in the development of guidelines for using technology in social studies teacher preparation: A reply to Crocco and Mason et al. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 2(4). Available at http://www.citejournal.org/voll/iss4/currentissues/socialstudies/article2.htm
9. Doolittle, T., & Hicks, D. (2003). Constructivism as a theoretical foundation for the use of technology in the social studies. Theory and Research in Social Education, 31(1), 72-104.
10. Downey, M. T., & Levstik, L. S. (1998). Teaching and learning history: The research base. Social Education, 52(6), 336-42.
11. Eisenhart, M. A., & Howe, K. R. (1992). Validity in educational research. In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Millory, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 644-680). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12. Eisner, E. W (2002). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (3rd ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
13. Ferster, B., Hammond, T., & Bull, G. (2006). PrimaryAccess: Creating digital documentaries in the social studies classroom. Social Education, 70(3), 147-150.
14. Foster, S., & Padgett, J. (1999). Authentic historical inquiry in the social studies classroom. The Clearing House 72(6), 357-63.
15. Freeman, M., deMarrais, K., Preissle, J., Roulston, K., & St Pierre, E. A. (2007). Standards of evidence in qualitative research: An incitement to discourse. Educational Researcher, 36(1), 25-32.
16. Friedman, A., & Hicks, D. (2006). The state of the field: Technology, social studies, and teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(2), 246-258. Retrieved November 21, 2007, from http://www.citejournal.org/articles/v6i2socialstudies1.pdf
17. Gall, J. P., Gall, M. D., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Applying educational research: A practical guide (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
18. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
19. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chi-cago, IL: Aldine.
20. Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
21. Grimmett, P., & MacKinnon, A. (1992). Craft knowledge and the education of teachers. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 18, pp. 385-456). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
22. Hammond, T., & Ferster, B. (in press). Student-created digital documentaries in the history classroom: Research designs and methods. In J. Lee & A. Friedman (Eds.), Research in Social Studies and Technology. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
23. Hofer, M., & Owings-Swan, K. (2005). Digital moviemaking—the harmonization of technology, pedagogy and content. International fournal of Technology in Teaching and learning, 1(2), 102-110.
24. Johnston, M. (2005). The lamp and the mirror: Action research and self studies in the social studies. In K. Barton (Ed.), Research methods in social studies education: Contemporary issues and perspectives (pp. 57-83). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
25. Kelly, A. V. (2004). The curriculum: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Lee, J. K. (2002). Digital history in the history/social studies classroom. The History Teacher 35(4), 503-517.
27. Martorella, P. (1997). Technology and the social studies—or: Which way to the sleeping giant? Theory and Research in Social Education, 25(4), 511-514.
28. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowl-edge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teacher’s College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
29. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). New-bury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
30. Paul, R. (1993). Critical thinking: How to prepare students for a rapidly changing world. Santa Rosa, CA: The Foundation for Critical Thinking.
31. Powell, A. G., Farrar, E., & Cohen, D. K. (1985). The shopping mall high school. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
32. Saye, J., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(3), 77-96.
33. Scheurman, G. (1998). From behaviorist to constructivist teaching. [Electronic version] Social Education, 62(1), 6-9.
34. Scheurman, G., & Newmann, F. M. (1998). Authentic intellectual work in social studies: Putting performance before pedagogy. Social Education, 62(1), 23-25.
35. Sedlak, M. W., Wheeler, C. W., Pullin, D. C., & Cusick, P. A. (1986). Selling students short: Classroom bargains and academic reform in the American high school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
36. Sexias, P. (1998). Student teachers thinking historically. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26(2), 310-341.
37. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of a new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
38. Stenhouse, L. (1970). Some limitations of the use of objectives in curriculum research and planning. Paedagogica Europaea, 6, 73-83.
39. Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heineman.
40. Thompson, A., and Mishra, P. (2007). Breaking news: TPCK becomes TPACK! Journal of Computing in Teacher Education. 24(2), 38.
41. Thornton, S. (2001a). Educating the educators: Rethinking subject matter and methods. Theory into Practice, 40(1), 72-79.
42. Thornton, S. J. (2001b). From content to subject matter. The Social Studies, 92(6), 237-242.
43. van Hover, S. (2006). Teaching history in the Old Dominion: The impact of Virginia’s accountability reform on seven secondary beginning history teachers. In S. G. Grant (Ed.), Measuring History: Cases of state-level testing across the United States (pp. 195-219). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
44. VanSledright, B. (2002). In search of America’s past: Learning to read history in elementary school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
45. Virginia Department of Education, (n.d.). School accreditation ratings description. Retrieved November 22, 2007, from http://www.pen.kl2.va.us/VDOE/src/accred-descriptions.shtml
46. Virginia Department of Education (2001). History and social science standards of learning curriculum framework 2001. Retrieved November 21, 2007, from http://www.pen.kl2.va.us/go/Sols/home.shtml
47. Virginia Department of Education. (2002). Virginia Standards of Learning as-sessments for the 2001 history and social science Standards of Learning. Retrieved November 22, 2007, from http://www.pen.kl2.va.us/VDOE/Assessment/HistoryBlueprints03/
48. Wineberg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
49. Yeager, E. A., & van Hover, S. (2006). Virginia vs. Florida: Two beginning history teachers’ perceptions of the influence of high-stakes tests on their instructional decision-making. Social Studies Research and Practice, 1(3), 340-358.