A comparative analysis of online discussion participation protocols

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 191-212

  Moore, Joi L ^a   Marra, Rose M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Computer mediated discussions; Online discussion participation; Online discussion protocols

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008756514     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2005.10782456     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (2003). Argumentation, computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognitions. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (eds.), Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments, (pp. 1-25), Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Beaudrie, B. P. (2000). Analysis of group problem-solving tasks in a geometry course for teachers using computer-mediated conferencing. Unpublished Ed D thesis, Montana State University, Bozeman.
3. Bodzin, A. M., & Park, J. C. (2000). Dialogue patterns of preservice science teachers using asynchronous computer-mediated communications on the World Wide Web. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 19(2), 161-194.
4. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271-315.
5. Cho, K. L., & Jonassen, D. H. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technology: Research & Development, 50(3), 5-22.
6. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
7. Collins, C., & Collins, S. (1996). The Internet as a tool. Call of the North, NECC ‘96. Proceedings of the Annual National Educational Computing Conference. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 398883)
8. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Derry, S. J., Levin, J. R., Osana, H., Jones, M. S., & Peterson, M. (2000). Fostering students’ statistical and scientific thinking: Lessons learned from an innovative college course. American Educational Research Journal, 37(4), 747-773.
10. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
11. Ertmer, P. A., & Quinn, J. (1999). The ID casebook: Case studies in instructional design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12. Fulford, C. P., & Zhang, S. (1993). Perceptions of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 8-21.
13. Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st Century. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
14. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2/3), 87-105.
15. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
16. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431.
17. Guzdial (1995). Software-realized scaffolding to facilitate programming for science learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 3(4), 1-44.
18. Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology. Instructional Science, 28(2), 115-152.
19. Harasim, L. M. (1989). Online education as a new domain. In R. Mason & A. R. Kaye (Eds.), Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education (pp. 50-62). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
20. Jeong, A. (2003). Sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in threaded discussions. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17(4), 397-431.
21. Jeong, A. & Joung, S. (2004). The effects of response constraints and message labels on interaction patterns and argumentation in online discussions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Researchers Association, San Diego, CA.
22. Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.) Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol 2, pp. 215-239). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Jonassen, D. H., & Kwon, H. (2001). Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 1042-1629.
24. Jonassen, D. H., & Land, S. M. (2000). Preface. In D. H. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments, (pp. iii-ix). Mah-wah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Jonassen, D. H., & Remidez, H. (2005). Mapping alternative discourse structures onto computer conferences. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 1(1/2), 113-129.
26. Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1998). Online social interchange, discord and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 57-74.
27. Kiesler, S., Siefel, J., & McGuire, T. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
28. Krippendorf, K. (1980). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Vol. 5. The Sage COMMTEXT Series, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
29. Kvalseth, T. O. (1989). Note on Cohens kappa. Psychological Reports, 65, 223-226.
30. Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
31. Marra, R. M., Moore, J. L., & Klimczak, A. (2004). A comparative analysis of content analysis protocols for online discussion forums. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 23-40.
32. Mazur, J. (2004). Conversation analysis for educational technologists: Theoretical and methodological issues for researching the structures, processes and meaning of online talk. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook for research in educational communications and technology, (2nd ed, pp. 1073-1098). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. National Education Association. (2000). Confronting the future of distance learning—Placing quality in reach. Retrieved March 26, 2004 from http://www.nea.org/nr/nr000614.html.
34. National Center for Educational Statistics. (1999). Distance Education at Postsecondary Education Institutions (Statistical Analysis Report NCES 2000-013). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
35. Pea, R. D. (1996). Seeing what we build together. Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 171-186). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Picciano, A. G. (1998). Developing an asynchronous course model at a large, urban university. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1). Retrieved March 21, 2004, from http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v2nl/v2nl_picciano.asp.
37. Pullinger, D. J. (1986). Chit-chat to electronic Journals. Computer conferencing supports scientific communication. In V. Arms (Ed.) IEEE transactions of professional communications, (PC29, 30-33).
38. Ravits, J. (1997). An ISD model for building online communities: Furthering the dialogue. In O. Abel, N. Maushak, & K. Wright (Eds.), Selected research and development presentations at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 297-307). Bloomington, IN: AECT.
39. Romiszowski, A., & Mason, R. (2004). Computer-mediated communication. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook for research in educational communications and technology, 2nd Edition, (pp. 397-432). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12(x), 8-22.
41. Salomon, G. (1988). Al in reverse: Computer tools that become cognitive. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 123-140.
42. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C.(1994). Computer support for knowledge- building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283.
43. Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2003). Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: the impact on cognitive processing. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL.
44. Sherry, L. (1996). Issues in distance learning. International Journal of Distance Education, 1(4), 337-365.
45. Sloan Foundation (2004). Entering the mainstream: The quality and extent of online education in the United States 2003 and 2004. Retrieved November 28, 2004, from http://Sloan-c.org/resources.
46. “Social Constructivism.” (2005). Retrieved April 15, 2005, from the University of California at Berkeley Graduate Student Instructor Teaching & Resource Center Web site: http://gsi.berkeley.edu/resources/learning/social.html.
47. Spitzer, M. (1989). Computer conferencing: An emerging technology. In G. Hawisher & S. Selfe (Eds.), Critical perspectives on computers and composition instruction (pp. 187-199). New York: Teachers College Press.
48. Suthers, D. D., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2001). Learning by constructing collaborative representations: An empirical comparison of three alternatives. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 577-584). Universiteit Masstricht.
49. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: University Press.
50. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
51. Ward, D. R., & Tiessen, E. L. (1997). Adding educational value to the Web: Active learning with a live page. Educational Technology, 37(5), 22-31.
52. Zhu, P. (1998). Learning and mentoring: Electronic discussion in a distance learning course. In C. J. Bonk & K. S. King, (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse, (pp. 233-259). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.