Drug drug interaction extraction from biomedical literature using syntax convolutional neural network

Bioinformatics

Volumn 32, Issue 22, 2016, Pages 3444-3453

  Zhao, Zhehuan ^a   Yang, Zhihao ^a   Luo, Ling ^a   Lin, Hongfei ^a   Wang, Jian ^a  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; DATA MINING; DRUG INTERACTION; HUMAN; PUBLICATION;

DATA MINING; DRUG INTERACTIONS; HUMANS; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; PUBLICATIONS;

EID: 85008626797     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw486     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aronson, A. R. (2001) Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap program. In: Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, American Medical Informatics Association, Washington, DC.
2. Baxter, K. and Preston, C. L. (2010) Stockley's Drug Interactions. Pharmaceutical Press, London.
3. Bengio, Y. et al. (2003) A neural probabilistic language model. J. Mach. Learning Res., 3, 1137-1155.
4. Bengio, Y. et al. (2013) Representation learning: a review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 35, 1798-1828.
5. Bjö rne, J. et al. (2013) UTurku: drug named entity recognition and drug-drug interaction extraction using SVM classification and domain knowledge. The North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, GA, USA, p. 651.
6. Bodenreider, O. (2004) The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D267-D270.
7. Bokharaeian, B. and Daz, A. (2013) NIL UCM: Extracting Drug-Drug Interactions from Text Through Combination of Sequence and Tree Kernels. The North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, GA, USA, p. 644.
8. Bunescu, R. C. and Mooney, R. J. (2005) A shortest path dependency kernel for relation extraction. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguistics. Vancouver, B. C., Canada, pp. 724-731.
9. Businaro, R. (2013) Why we need an efficient and careful pharmacovigilance. J. Pharmacovigilance, 1, 1000e1110
10. Chowdhury, M. F. M. and Lavelli, A. (2013) FBK-irst: A multi-phase kernel based approach for drug-drug interaction detection and classification that exploits linguistic information. The North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, GA, USA, p. 53.
11. Collobert, R. et al. (2011) Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. J. Mach. Learning Res., 12, 2493-2537.
12. Crammer, K. and Singer, Y. (2002) On the algorithmic implementation of multiclass kernel-based vector machines. J. Mach. Learning Res., 2, 265-292.
13. Dietterich, T. G. (1998) Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Comput., 10, 1895-1923.
14. Fundel, K. et al. (2007) RelEx-Relation extraction using dependency parse trees. Bioinformatics, 23, 365-371.
15. Hashimoto, K. et al. (2014) Jointly learning word representations and composition functions using predicate-argument structures. EMNLP, 14, 1544-1555.
16. Hendrickx, I. et al. (2009). Semeval-2010 task 8: multi-way classification of semantic relations between pairs of nominals. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Evaluations: Recent Achievements and Future Directions. The Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp. 94-99.
17. Herrero-Zazo, M. et al. (2013) The DDI corpus: an annotated corpus with pharmacological substances and drug-drug interactions. J. Biomed. Inform., 46, 914-920.
18. Hinton, G. E. and Zemel, R. S. (1994) Autoencoders, minimum description length, and Helmholtz free energy. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Syst., 6, 3-10.
19. Hsu, C. W. and Lin, C. J. (2002) A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 13, 415-425.
20. Huang, E. H. et al. (2012) Improving word representations via global context and multiple word prototypes. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, The Association for Computational Linguistics, Jeju Island, Korea, pp. 873-882.
21. Jiang, J. and Zhai, C. (2007) An empirical study of tokenization strategies for biomedical information retrieval. Inform. Retrieval, 10, 341-363.
22. Kim, S. et al. (2015) Extracting drug-drug interactions from literature using a rich feature-based linear kernel approach. J. Biomed. Inform., 55, 23-30.
23. Knox, C. et al. (2011) DrugBank 3. 0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugs. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, D1035-D1041.
24. Krizhevsky, A. et al. (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Syst., 25, 1097-1105.
25. Lai, S., Liu, K., He, S., & Zhao, J. (2015). How to generate a good word embedding Intelligent Systems IEEE, 1-1.
26. Landau, E. (2009) Jackson's Death Raises Questions About Drug Interactions. CNN, June 26, 2009.
27. Larochelle, H. et al. (2009) Exploring strategies for training deep neural networks. J. Mach. Learning Res., 10, 1-40.
28. Levy, O. and Goldberg, Y. (2014) Dependency-based word embeddings. ACL, 2, 302-308.
29. Mikolov, T. et al. (2013) Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations. HLT-NAACL, 13, 746-751.
30. Miyao, Y. and Tsujii, J. (2008) Feature forest models for probabilistic HPSG parsing. Comput. Linguistics, 34, 35-80.
31. Segura Bedmar, I. Martinez, P. and Sanchez Cisneros, D. (2011) The 1st DDIExtraction-2011 challenge task: Extraction of Drug-Drug Interactions from biomedical texts. In: Proceedings of the 1st Challenge Task on Drug-Drug Interaction Extraction, CEUR-WS, Huelva, Spain, pp. 1-9.
32. Segura Bedmar, I. et al. (2013) Semeval-2013 task 9: extraction of drug-drug interactions from biomedical texts. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop On Semantic Evaluation, The North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 341-350.
33. Segura Bedmar, I. et al. (2014) Lessons learnt from the DDIExtraction-2013 shared task. J. Biomed. Inform., 51, 152-164.
34. Sun, Y. et al. (2009) Classification of imbalanced data: a review. Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artificial Intell., 23, 687-719.
35. Thomas, P. et al. (2013) WBI-DDI: drug-drug interaction extraction using majority voting. In: Proceedings of the Second Joint Conference On Lexical and Computational Semantics, The North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 628-635.
36. Wan, L. et al. (2013) Regularization of neural networks using dropconnect. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference On Machine Learning (ICML-13), The North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 1058-1066.
37. Xu, K. et al. (2015). Semantic relation classification via convolutional neural networks with simple negative sampling. In: Proceedings of Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, SIGDAT, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 536-540.
38. Yan, X. et al. (2015). Classifying Relations via Long Short Term Memory Networks along Shortest Dependency Path. In: Proceedings of Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. SIGDAT, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 1785-1794.
39. Zeng, D. et al. (2014) Relation classification via convolutional deep neural network. In: Proceedings of COLING, the Association for Computational Linguistics, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 2335-2344.