Household travel surveys in context-based approach for adjusting ITE trip generation rates in urban contexts

Transportation Research Record

Volumn 2307, Issue , 2012, Pages 108-119

  Clifton, Kelly J ^a   Currans, Kristina M ^a   Cutter, April C ^a   Schneider, Robert ^b  

^a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; HANDBOOKS; LAND USE; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; SURVEYS;

% REDUCTIONS; BUILT ENVIRONMENT; CONTEXT-BASED; HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEYS; IN CONTEXTS; MODE SPLIT; REGIONAL SCALE; SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS; TRIP GENERATION RATE; URBAN CONTEXT;

VEHICLES;

EID: 85008468654     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: 21694052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2307-12     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation: An Information Report, 8th Edition. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 2008.
2. Rizavi, A., and A. Yeung. Urban Commuting Trends—Comparing Trip Generation Practices. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Vancouver, Canada, August 2010.
3. Nelson–Nygaard Consulting Associates. Crediting Low-Traffic Developments: Adjusting Site-Level Vehicle Trip Generation Using URBE-MIS. San Francisco, Calif., 2005.
4. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation Handbook: An ITE Recommended Practice, 2nd ed. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 2004.
5. Lerner-Lam, E., S. Celniker, G. Halbert, C. Chellman, and S. Ryan. Neo-Traditional Neighborhood Design and Its Implication for Traffic Engineering. Institute of Transportation Engineering Journal, Vol. 62, No. 1, January 1992.
6. Badoe, D., and E. J. Miller. Transportation—Land-Use Interaction: Empirical Findings in North America, and Their Implications for Modeling. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2000, pp. 235–263.
7. Fleet, C., and A. Sosslau. Trip Generation Procedures: An Improved Design for Today’s Needs. Institute of Transportation Engineering Journal, Vol. 46, No. 11, Nov. 1976.
8. Georgia Regional Transportation Authority. GRTA DRI Review Package Technical Guidelines, Jan. 14, 2002.
9. Virginia Department of Transportation. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations Small Area Plan Amendments: 24VAC30-155-60.D.1: Traffic Impact Statement. Virginia, April 2010.
10. Montgomery Planning. Local Area Transportation Review. Montgomery County, Md., 2010.
11. City of San Diego. San Diego Municipal Code—Land Development Code: Trip Generation Manual. San Diego, Calif., 2003.
12. Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines for Environmental Review. Planning Department of City and County of San Francisco, Calif., 2002.
13. Samdahl, D. Travel Demand Research for Downtown Kent. Fehr and Peers, Kent, Washington, 2010.
14. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Trip Generation Rates for Urban Infill Land Uses in California: Phase II, Final Report, 2009.
15. San Diego Association of Governments. Trip Generation for Smart Growth: Planning Tools for the San Diego Region. San Diego, Calif., 2010.
16. Bochner, B. S., K. Hooper, B. Sperry, and R. Dunphy. NCHRP Report 684: Enhancing Internal Trip Capture Estimation for Mixed-Use Developments. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011.
17. Sperry, B. Comparing Methodologies to Estimate Internal Trip Capture at Mixed-Use Developments. Presented at Annual Meeting of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, San Francisco, Calif., 2010.
18. Oregon Department of Transportation, Department of Land Conservation and Development. Oregon Administrative Rules: Division 12, Transportation Planning, 660-012-0000. Salem, Ore., 2006.
19. Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1780, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 87–114.
20. Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. Travel and the Built Environment: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 76, No. 3, 2010, pp. 265–294.
21. Guo, J. Y., C. R. Bhat, and R. B. Copperman. Effect of the Built Environment on Motorized and Nonmotorized Trip Making: Substitutive, Complementary, or Synergistic? In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2010, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 1–11.
22. D’Sousa, E., A. Forsyth, J. Koepp, J. M. Oakes, K. H. Schmitz, J. Zimmerman, D. Rodriguez, and Y. Song. Environment and Physical Activity: GIS Protocols. Twin Cities Walking Study, Minneapolis, Minn., 2006.
23. Schneider, R. J. Understanding Sustainable Transportation Choices: Shifting Routine Automobile Travel to Walking and Bicycling. PhD dissertation. University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley, California, 2011. http://www.uctc.net/research/UCTC-DISS-2011-01.pdf.