Clinical effectiveness of different polishing systems and self-etch adhesives in Class v composite resin restorations: Two-year randomized controlled clinical trial

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 19-29

  Jang, J H ^a   Kim, H Y ^b   Shin, S M ^c   Lee, C O ^c   Kim, D S ^c   Choi, K K ^c   Kim, S Y ^c  

^a Kyung Hee University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Korea University   (South Korea)

^c Kyung Hee University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLEARFIL SE BOND; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT; XENO V;

ADULT; AGED; CHEMISTRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL LIGHT-CURING; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTAL RESTORATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADULT; AGED; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIGHT-CURING OF DENTAL ADHESIVES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 85008352228     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/16-104-C     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Yap A, Lye K, &Sau C (1997) Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems Operative Dentistry 22(6) 260-265
2. Ferreira RS, Lopes GC, &Baratieri LN (2004) Direct posterior resin composite restorations: Considerations on finishing/polishing. Clinical procedures Quintessence International 35(5) 359-366
3. Hoelscher DC, Neme AM, Pink FE, &Hughes PJ (1997) The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials Operative Dentistry 23(1) 36-42
4. Jefferies SR (2007) Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry: A state-of-The-art review Dental Clinics of North America 51(2) 379-397
5. Lutz F, Setcos JC, &Phillips RW (1983) New finishing instruments for composite resins Journal of the American Dental Association 107(4) 575-580
6. Scientific Documentation of Enhance-PoGo. (2014) Retrieved online Feb 2014 from: http://www.dentsply.com
7. Berger SB, Palialol AR, Cavalli V, &Giannini M (2011) Surface roughness and staining susceptibility of compos-ite resins after finishing and polishing Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 23(1) 34-43
8. Antonson SA, Yazici AR, Kilinc E, Antonson DE, &Hardigan P (2011) Comparison of different finishing/ polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites Journal of Dentistry 39(Supplement 1) e9-e17
9. Borges AB, Marsilio AL, Pagani C, &Rodrigues JR (2004) Surface roughness of packable composite resins polished with various systems Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 16(1) 42-47
10. Çelik C, &Ozgünaltay G (2009) Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness of toothcolored materials Quintessence International 40(9) 783-789
11. Lu H, Roeder LB, &Powers JM (2003) Effect of polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 15(5) 297-303
12. Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, &Aksoy G (2008) The influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites Operative Dentistry 33(1) 44-50
13. Jung M, Eichelberger K, &Klimek J (2007) Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing Operative Dentistry 32(4) 347-355
14. Kim YM, Shin SJ, Song MJ, &Park JW (2011) The evaluation of surface roughness and polishing time between polishing systems Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics 36(2) 119-124
15. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, &Vanherle G (2007) Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials Clinical Oral Investigations 11(1) 5-33
16. Kim SY, Lee KW, Seong SR, Lee MA, Lee IB, Son HH, Kim HY, Oh MH, &Cho BH (2009) Two-year clinical effectiveness of adhesives and retention form on resin composite restorations of non-carious cervical lesions Operative Dentistry 39(5) 507-515
17. Häfer M, Jentsch H, Haak R, &Schneider H (2015) A three-year clinical evaluation of a one-step self-etch and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions Journal of Dentistry 43(3) 350-361
18. Lawson NC, Robles A, Fu CC, Lin CP, Sawlani K, &Burgess JO (2015) Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions Journal of Dentistry 43(10) 1229-1234
19. Lee KW, Choung SJ, Han YC, Son HH, Um CM, Oh MH, &Cho BH (2006) Prospective clinical evaluation of three different bonding systems in class V resin restorations with or without mechanical retention Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics 31(4) 300-311
20. Suh BI, Feng L, Wang Y, Cripe C, Cincione F, &RjikW (1999) The effect of the pulse-delay cure technique on residual strain in composites Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 20(2) 13-14
21. Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjör I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, &Heintze SD (2010) FDI World Dental Federation: Clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-Update and clinical examples Clinical Oral Investigations 14(4) 349-366
22. Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjör I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, &Heintze SD (2010) FDI World Dental Federation-Clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations: Update and clinical examples Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 12(4) 259-272
23. Kuss O (2002) How to use SAS for logistic regression with correlated data. Proceedings of the 27th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference 261
24. Stokes ME, Davis CS, &Koch GG (2001) Categorical Data Analysis Using SAS. 2nd edition SAS Institute/Wiley, Cary NC
25. Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, &Ambrosano GM (2003) Effects of various finishing systems on the surface roughness and staining susceptibility of packable composite resins Dental Materials 19(1) 12-18
26. Ferracane JL, Condon JR, &Mitchem JC (1992) Evaluation of subsurface defects created during the finishing of composites Journal of Dental Research 71(9) 1628-1632
27. van Dijken JW, &Ruyter IE (1987) Surface characteristics of posterior composites after polishing and toothbrushing Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 45(5) 337-346
28. Zimmerli B, Lussi A, &Flury S (2011) Operator variability using different polishing methods and surface geometry of a nanohybrid composite Operative Dentistry 36(1) 52-59
29. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Satoshi I, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Armstrong S, Lambrechts P, &Vanherle G (2003) Microtensile bond strengths of one-and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin American Journal of Dentistry 16(6) 414-420
30. Brackett WW, Ito S, Nishitani Y, Haisch LD, &Pashley DH (2006) The microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground enamel Operative Dentistry 31(3) 332-337
31. Patil D, Singbal KP, &Kamat S (2011) Comparative evaluation of the enamel bond strength of ''etch-andrinse'' and ''all-in-one'' bonding agents on cut and uncut enamel surfaces Journal of Conservative Dentistry 14(2) 147-150
32. Da Costa J, Ferracane J, Paravina RD, Mazur RF, &Roeder L (2007) The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 19(4) 214-224
33. ErgücüZ,Türkün LS, &Aladag A (2008) Color stability of nanocomposites polished with one-step systems Operative Dentistry 33(4) 413-420