Availability of digital object identifiers in publications archived by PubMed

Scientometrics

Volumn 110, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 1453-1469

  Boudry, Christophe ^a,b,c   Chartron, Ghislaine ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE CAEN   (France)

^b PSL Research University   (France)

^c Bioinformatique et Chimie Moléculaire   (France)

Author keywords

Biology; Country; Digital object identifier; Journal article; Medicine; Publication; Publisher; PubMed

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008174135     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-2225-6     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. ALM. (2016). Retrieved from http://alm.plos.org/.
2. Altmetric. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.altmetric.com/.
3. Boudry, C., Denion, E., Mortemousque, B., & Mouriaux, F. (2016). Trends and topics in eye disease research in PubMed from 2010 to 2014. PeerJ, 4, e1557. doi:10.7717/peerj.1557.
4. Boudry, C., & Mouriaux, F. (2015). Eye neoplasms research: A bibliometric analysis from 1966 to 2012. European Journal of Ophthalmology, 25(4), 357–365. doi:10.5301/ejo.5000556.
5. Braile, D. M. (2011). After the impact factor, the DOI. Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 26(3), 1–2. doi:10.5935/1678-9741.20110001.
6. Brase, J., Lautenschlager, M., & Sens, I. (2015). The tenth anniversary of assigning DOI names to scientific data and a five year history of DataCite. D-Lib Magazine. doi:10.1045/january2015-brase.
7. Carnevale, R., & Aronsky, D. (2007). The life and death of URLs in five biomedical informatics journals. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76(4), 269–273. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.12.001.
8. Chandrakar, R. (2006). Digital object identifier system: An overview. The Electronic Library, 24(4), 445–452. doi:10.1108/02640470610689151.
9. Crossref Event Data. (2016). Retrieved from http://eventdata.crossref.org/.
10. Crossref initiatives will support reporting to funders|Research Information. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.researchinformation.info/news/analysis-opinion/crossref-initiatives-will-support-reporting-funders.
11. crossref.org. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.crossref.org/.
12. crossref.org::publisher fees. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.crossref.org/02publishers/20pub_fees.html.
13. CrossRef’s DOI Event Tracker Pilot—Crossref Blog. (2015). Retrieved from http://blog.crossref.org/2015/03/crossrefs-doi-event-tracker-pilot.html.
14. DeRisi, S., Kennison, R., & Twyman, N. (2003). The what and whys of DOIs. PLoS Biology, 1(2), e57. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0000057.
15. Digital Object Identifier System Handbook. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.doi.org/hb.html.
16. DOI display guidelines. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.crossref.org/02publishers/doi_display_guidelines.html.
17. Ducut, E., Liu, F., & Fontelo, P. (2008). An update on uniform resource locator (URL) decay in MEDLINE abstracts and measures for its mitigation. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-8-23.
18. Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, scopus, web of science, and google scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal: Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 22(2), 338–342. doi:10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF.
19. Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2014). Errors in DOI indexing by bibliometric databases. Scientometrics, 102(3), 2181–2186. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1503-4.
20. Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: Rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. doi:10.1080/00987913.2013.10765486.
21. González-Valiente, C. L., Pacheco-Mendoza, J., & Arencibia-Jorge, R. (2016). A review of altmetrics as an emerging discipline for research evaluation. Learned Publishing, 29(4), 229–238. doi:10.1002/leap.1043.
22. Gorraiz, J., Melero-Fuentes, D., Gumpenberger, C., & Valderrama-Zurián, J.-C. (2016). Availability of digital object identifiers (DOIs) in web of science and scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 98–109. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.008.
23. Haustein, S., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0120495. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120495.
24. Haustein, S., Peters, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2014). Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1145–1163. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1221-3.
25. Home—NLM Catalog—NCBI. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog/.
26. Honor, L. B., Haselgrove, C., Frazier, J. A., & Kennedy, D. N. (2016). Data citation in neuroimaging: Proposed best practices for data identification and attribution. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 10, 34. doi:10.3339/fninf.2016.00034.
27. ISO 26324:2012—Information and documentation—Digital object identifier system. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=43506.
28. Khedmatgozar, H. R., & Alipour-Hafezi, M. (2015). A basic comparative framework for evaluation of digital identifier systems. Journal of Digital Information Management, 13(3), 191.
29. Neumann, J., & Brase, J. (2014). DataCite and DOI names for research data. Journal of Computer Aided Molecular Design, 28(10), 1035–1041. doi:10.1007/s10822-014-9776-5.
30. Park, S., Zo, H., Ciganek, A. P., & Lim, G. G. (2011). Examining success factors in the adoption of digital object identifier systems. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(6), 626–636.
31. Paskin, N. (1999). The digital object identifier system: Digital technology meets content management. Interlending and Document Supply, 27(1), 13–16. doi:10.1108/02641619910255829.
32. Paskin, N. (2010). Digital object identifier (DOI) system. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, 3, 1586–1592.
33. Plumx. (2015). Retrieved from https://plu.mx/.
34. Rasmussen, P. G., & Andersen, J. P. (2013). Altmetrics: An alternate perspective on research evaluation. ScieCom Info, 96(2). Retrieved from http://journals.lub.lu.se/index.php/sciecominfo/article/view/7292.
35. RECODE. (2015). Retrieved from June 13, 2016. http://policy.recodeproject.eu/publishers/policy-content/.
36. Rosenblatt, B. (1997). The digital object identifier: Solving the dilemma of copyright protection online. Journal of Electronic Publishing. doi:10.3998/3336451.0003.204.
37. RP-16-2013 PIE-J (short URL)—National Information Standards Organization. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.niso.org/publications/rp/rp-16-2013/.
38. Sidman, D., & Davidson, T. (2001). A practical guide to automating the digital supply chain with the digital object identifier (DOI). Publishing Research Quarterly, 17(2), 9–23. doi:10.1007/s12109-001-0019-y.
39. Sieck, S. (2003). Using the DOI to improve profitability in publishers’ E-Commerce operations. EPS white paper series.
40. Simmonds, A. W. (1999). The digital object identifier (DOI). Publishing Research Quarterly, 15(2), 10–13. doi:10.1007/s12109-999-0022-2.
41. Sud, P., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Evaluating altmetrics. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1131–1143. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1117-2.
42. Swan, A. (2010). The open access citation advantage: Studies and results to date. Retrieved from http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/18516.
43. Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e64841. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064841.
44. Tolwinska, A. (2015). Need to know what’s going on with an article DOI? The wait is over. Science Editor, 38(3/4), 106–108.
45. United Nations Statistics Division-Standard Country and Area Codes Classifications (M49). (2016). Retrieved from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm.
46. Valderrama-Zurián, J.-C., Aguilar-Moya, R., Melero-Fuentes, D., & Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2015). A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 570–576. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.002.
47. Vardakas, K. Z., Tsopanakis, G., Poulopoulou, A., & Falagas, M. E. (2015). An analysis of factors contributing to PubMed’s growth. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 592–617.
48. Wagner, C., Gebremichael, M. D., Taylor, M. K., & Soltys, M. J. (2009). Disappearing act: Decay of uniform resource locators in health care management journals. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 97(2), 122–130. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.97.2.009.
49. Wang, J. (2007). Digital object identifiers and their use in libraries. Serials Review, 33(3), 161–164. doi:10.1016/j.serrev.2007.05.006.
50. Zotero|Home. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.zotero.org/.