Trends and topics in eye disease research in PubMed from 2010 to 2014

PeerJ

Volumn 2016, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Boudry, Christophe ^a,b,c   Denion, Eric ^d   Mortemousque, Bruno ^e,f   Mouriaux, Fréderic ^e,f  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE CAEN   (France)

^b PSL Research University   (France)

^c Bioinformatique et Chimie Moléculaire   (France)

^d CAEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^f Inst de Rech Contre le Cancer IRCC   (France)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Eye diseases; Journals; Ophthalmology; Science publishing; Socioeconomics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASIA; CATARACT; CHINA; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; EUROPE; EYE DISEASE; GLAUCOMA; MACULAR DEGENERATION; NORTH AMERICA; PACIFIC ISLANDS; PUBLICATION; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED STATES; VISUAL DISORDER;

EID: 84955620285     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21678359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1557     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Albayrak Ö, Föcker M, Wibker K, Hebebrand J. 2012. Bibliometric assessment of publication output of child and adolescent psychiatric/psychological affiliations between 2005 and 2010 based on the databases PubMed and Scopus. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 21(6):327-337 DOI 10.1007/s00787-012-0265-x.
2. Boudry C. 2015. Web 2.0 applications in medicine: trends and topics in the literature. Medicine 2.0 4(1):e2 DOI 10.2196/med20.3628.
3. Boudry C, Mouriaux F. 2015. Eye neoplasms research: a bibliometric analysis from 1966 to 2012. European Journal of Ophthalmology 25(4):357-365 DOI 10.5301/ejo.5000556.
4. Chen H, Chen CH, Jhanji V. 2013. Publication times, impact factors, and advance online publication in ophthalmology journals. Ophthalmology 120(8):1697-1701 DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.044.
5. Deshazo JP, Lavallie DL, Wolf FM. 2009. Publication trends in the medical informatics literature: 20 years of "Medical Informatics" in MeSH. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 9:7 DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-9-7.
6. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. 2008. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal 22(2):338-342 DOI 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF.
7. Garfield E. 1972. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178(4060):471-479 DOI 10.1126/science.178.4060.471.
8. Geisler E. 2000. The Metrics of Science and Technology. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
9. Glynn RW, Chin JZ, Kerin MJ, Sweeney KJ. 2010. Representation of cancer in the medical literature-a bibliometric analysis. PLoS ONE 5(11):e13902 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013902.
10. Goffman W, Warren KS. 1969. Dispersion of papers among journals based on a mathematical analysis of two diverse medical literatures. Nature 221:1205-1207 DOI 10.1038/2211205a0.
11. GuerinB, Flynn H, Brady J, O'BrienC. 2009. Worldwide geographical distribution of ophthalmology publications. International Ophthalmology 29(6):511-516 DOI 10.1007/s10792-008-9278-3.
12. Gupta BM, Bala A, Gupta R. 2014. World research output in conjunctivitis research: a quantitative analysis during 2002-11. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management 7(2):261-275 DOI 10.1080/09737766.2013.832908.
13. Hirsch JE. 2005. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102(46):16569-16572 DOI 10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
14. Katibeh M, Moein H-R, Javadi M-A. 2011. Contribution of Iran to the ophthalmic literature over the past three decades. Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research 6(3):225-226.
15. Kondilis BK, Kiriaze IJ, Athanasoulia AP, Falagas ME. 2008. Mapping Health Literacy Research in the European Union: a bibliometric analysis. PLoS ONE 3(6):e2519 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0002519.
16. Kumaragurupari R, Sieving PC, Lalitha P. 2010. A bibliometric study of publications by Indian ophthalmologists and vision researchers, 2001-06. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 58(4):275-280 DOI 10.4103/0301-4738.64117.
17. Kumar A, Cheeseman R, Durnian JM. 2011. Subspecialization of the ophthalmic literature: a review of the publishing trends of the top general, clinical ophthalmic journals. Ophthalmology 118(6):1211-1214 DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.023.
18. Kumbar M, Akhtary S. 1998. Bibliometric analysis of ophthalmology literature. Library Science with a Slant to Documentation and Information Studies 35:201-207.
19. Liesegang TJ. 2011. The International American Journal of Ophthalmology. American Journal of Ophthalmology 152(1):1-2 DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.03.024.
20. MEDLINE Indexing Online Training Course. 2015. Available at http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/indexing/training/USE_010.html.
21. Michon F, Tummers M. 2009. The dynamic interest in topics within the biomedical scientific community. PLoS ONE 4(8):e6544 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006544.
22. Neri M, Milazzo D, Ugolini D, Milic M, Campolongo A, Pasqualetti P, Bonassi S. 2015. Worldwide interest in the comet assay: a bibliometric study. Mutagenesis 30(1):155-163 DOI 10.1093/mutage/geu061.
23. Ohba N. 2005. Bibliometric analysis of the current international ophthalmic publications. Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi 109(3):115-125.
24. Ramos JM, Padilla S, Masiá M, Gutiérrez F. 2008. A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research indexed in PubMed, 1997-2006. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 12(12):1461-1468.
25. Ramos JM, González-Alcaide G, Bolaños-Pizarro M. 2013. Bibliometric analysis of leishmaniasis research in Medline (1945-2010). Parasite Vector 6:55 DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-6-55.
26. Robert C, Arreto C-D, Azerad J, Gaudy J-F. 2004. Bibliometric overview of the utilization of artificial neural networks in medicine and biology. Scientometrics 59(1):117-130 DOI 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000013302.59845.34.
27. Schlenker MB, Manalo E, Wong AMF. 2013. Research productivity of Canadian ophthalmology departments in top 10 ophthalmology and vision science journals from 2001 to 2010. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology 48(1):46-55 DOI 10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.10.001.
28. Sweileh WM, Al-Jabi SW, Shanti YI, Sawalha AF, Sa'ed HZ. 2015. Contribution of Arab researchers to ophthalmology: a bibliometric and comparative analysis. SpringerPlus 4:1-7 DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-0806-0.
29. Ugolini D, Cimmino MA, Casilli C, Mela GS. 2001. How the European Union writes about ophthalmology. Scientometrics 52(1):45-58 DOI 10.1023/A:1012746927721.
30. Ugolini D, Puntoni R, Perera FP, Schulte PA, Bonassi S. 2007. A bibliometric analysis of scientific production in cancer molecular epidemiology. Carcinogenesis 28(8):1774-1779 DOI 10.1093/carcin/bgm129.
31. Ugolini D, Neri M, Casilli C, Ceppi M, Canessa PA, Ivaldi GP, Paganuzzi M, Bonassi S. 2010. A bibliometric analysis of scientific production in mesothelioma research. Lung Cancer 70(2):129-135 DOI 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.01.013.
32. Venable GT, Shepherd BA, Roberts ML, Taylor DR, Khan NR, Jr PK. 2014. An application of Bradford's law: identification of the core journals of pediatric neurosurgery and a regional comparison of citation density. Child's Nervous System 30(10):1717-1727 DOI 10.1007/s00381-014-2481-9.
33. Vioque J, Ramos JM, Navarrete-Muñoz EM, García-de-la-Hera M. 2009. A bibliometric study of scientific literature on obesity research in PubMed (1988-2007). Obesity Reviews 11(8):603-611 DOI 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00647.x.
34. Wallace ML, Larivière V, Gingras Y. 2012. A small world of citations? The influence of collaboration networks on citation practices. PLoS ONE 7(3):e33339 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0033339.
35. Young H, Belanger T. 1983. The ALA Glossary of Library and Information Science. Chicago: American Library Association.
36. Zhao Z-G, Guo X-G, Xu C-T, Pan B-R, Xu L-X. 2011. Bibliometric analysis on retinoblastoma literatures in PubMed during 1929 to 2010. International Journal of Ophthalmology 4:115-120.