Conceptualizing the use of online technologies for gifted secondary students

Roeper Review

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 190-196

  Ng, Wan ^a   Nicholas, Howard ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007873473     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190709554408     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Anderson, L., & Krathwoht, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom 's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
2. Anderson, T. (2004a). Teaching in an online learning context. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 271-294). Alberta, Canada: Athabasca University Press.
3. Anderson, T. (2004b). Towards a theory of online leam-, ing. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 33-60). Alberta, Canada: Athabasca University Press.
4. Belcastro, F. P. (2002). Electronic technology and its use with rural gifted students. Roeper Review, 25. 14-16.
5. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
6. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Christopher, M. M., Thomas, J. A., & Tallent-Runnels, M. K. (2004). Raising the bar: Encouraging high level thinking in online discussion forums. Roeper Review. 26. 166-171.
8. Dwyer, D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: What we've learned. Educational Leadership. 51(7). 4-10.
9. Emerick, L. (1992). Academic underachievcmcnt among the gifted: Students' perceptions of factors that reverse the pattem. Gifted Child Quarterly. 36. 140-146.
10. Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). Programs fer the gifted few or talent development for the many? Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 735-738.
11. Feldhusen, J. F., & Wood, B. K.(1997). Developing growth plans for gifted students. Gifted Child Today. 20(6). 24-28.
12. Forchcri, P., & Molfino, M. T. (2000). ICT as a tool for learning to learn. In D. M. Watson & T. Downes (Eds.), Communications and neworking In education (pp.175-184). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
13. Fuchs, T., & Woessmann, L. (2004). Computers and student learning: Bivariate and multivariate evidence on the availability and use of computers at home and school. Germany: University of Munich, Institute for Economic Research
14. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21 st century. New York: Basic Books.
15. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking in text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2. 87-105.
16. Goodman, S. (2003). Teaching youth media: A critical guide to literacy, video production and social change. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Gross, M. U. M. (1993). Exceptionally gifted children. London: Routledge.
18. Gunawardena, C., & Zittlc, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education. 11(3), 8-26.
19. Hiltz, S. R. (1994). The virtual classroom: Learning without limits via computer networks. Norwood. NJ: Ablex.
20. Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1984, August). Effects of ability grouping on elementary school pupils: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Ontario, Canada.
21. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analy-sis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal 19. 415-428.
22. Leh, A. S. (2001). Computer-mediated communication and social presence in a distance learning environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications. 7. 109-128.
23. Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Maker, J. (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems Corporation.
25. Mayes, J. T. (1995). Learning technology and Groundhog Day. In W. Strang, V. Simpson, & D. Slater (Eds.), Hypermedia at work: Practice and theory in higher education. Canterbury, England: University of Kent Press. Retrieved May 30, 2006, from http://apu.gcal.ac.uk/clti/papers/Groundhog.html
26. McConnell, D. (2000). Implementing computer supported cooperative learning (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
27. McKenzie, J. (1999). Scoring high with new information technologies. The Educational Technology Journal. 8(7), 1.
28. Mistier-Jackson, M., & Songer, N. B. (2000). Student motivation and Internet technology: Arc students empowered to leant science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37. 459-479.
29. Monks, F., & Mason, E. (2002). Developmental psychology and giftedness: Theories and research. In K. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.). International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp.141-155). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
30. Munto, J. (2005). Understanding how gifted and talented students learn. Retrieved December 19, 2005, from http://www.edfac.unimelb.edu.au/LED/ELAGE/documents/GLT-Understandhowgift.pdf
31. Ng, W., & Gunstonc, R. (2002). Students' perceptions of the effectiveness of the World Wide Web as a research and teaching tool in science learning. Research in Science Education, 32,489-510.
32. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Hard & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism: Research reports and essays. 1985-1990 (pp. 1-12). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
34. Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.
35. Pedretti, E., Mayer-Smith, J., & Woodrow, J. (1998). Technology, text and talk: Students' learning in a technology enhanced secondary science classroom. Science Education, 82.569-589.
36. Peterson, J., A Colangelo, N. (1996). Gifted achievers and underachievers: A comparison of patterns found in school files. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74, 399-407.
37. Piaget, J. (1955). The construction of reality in the child. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.
38. Piaget, J. (1972). Psychology and epistemology: Towards a theory of knowledge. London: Penguin University Books.
39. Poole, D. M. (2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 33, 162-177.
40. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon. 9(5), 1-6. Retrieved January 16, 2006, from http//www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives.%20Digital%20Immigrarts%20-%20Part1.pdf
41. Prensky, M. (2003). Engage me or enrage me: What today's learners demand. On the Horizon 9(6), 60-64. Retrieved January 16.2006. from http://www.edu-cause.edu/ir/library/pdf/enr0553.pdf
42. Reis, S., & McCoach, D. (2000). The underachievcmcnt of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44. 152-170.
43. Renzulli, J. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60. 180-184.
44. Renzulli, J. (1986). The three ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.). Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. Rogers, K. B. (1991). The relationship of grouping practices to the education of the gifted and talented learner. Storrs: University of Connecticut. The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
46. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 74(2), 50-71.
47. Ruberg, L. F., Moore, D. M., & Taylor, C. D. (1996). Suident participation, interaction and regulation in a computer-mediated communication environment: A qualitative study. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 14. 243-268.
48. Swan, K. (2003). Developing social presence in online course discussions. In S. Naidu (Ed.), learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices (pp. 147-164). London: Kogan Page.
49. Tcrman, L. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
50. Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (2002). E-merging: Perspectives on information and communications technology-teaching and learning in the VCE. Victoria, Australia: Author.
51. Vygotsky, L.S.(1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53. Wallace, R. M. (2002). 'The Internet as a site for changing practice: The case of Ms. Owens. Research in Science Education, 32, 465-487.