Parent attitudes on the importance and success of integrated self‐contained services for students who are gifted, learning disabled, and gifted/learning disabled

Roeper Review

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 241-250

  Hishinuma, Earl S ^a   Nishimura, Stephanie T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007857371     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190009554046     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. ASSETS School. (1989-90). Previous school and ASSETS School: Program evaluation, 1989-90. Pearl Harbor, HI: Author.
2. ASSETS School. (1991). ASSETS School self-study report. Pearl Harbor, HI: Author.
3. ASSETS School. (1991-92). Previous school and ASSETS School: Program evaluation, 1991-92. Pearl Harbor, HI: Author.
4. Association for the Gifted. (1989). Standards for programs involving the gifted and talented. Reston, Virginia: Council for Exceptional Children.
5. Babbie, E. R. (1973). Survey research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
6. Barringer, H., Gardner, R. W., and Levin, M. J. (1993). Asians and Pacific Islanders in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7. Baum, S. M., Owen, S. V., and Dixon, J. (1991). To be gifted and learning disabled. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
8. Bees, C. (1998). The GOLD Program: A program for gifted learning disabled students. Roeper Review, 21(2), 155-161.
9. Beggs, D. L., Mouw, J. T., and Barton, J. A. (1989). Evaluating gifted programs: Documenting individual and programmatic outcomes. Roeper Review, 12(2), 73-75.
10. Bessell, H. (1972). The magic circle: Human development program (rev. ed.; original by Palomares, U., and Ball, G.). La Mesa, CA: Human Development Training Institute.
11. Bireley, M. (1995). Crossover children: A sourcebook for helping children who are gifted and learning disabled (2nd ed.). Reston, Virginia: Council for Exceptional Children.
12. Borland, J. H. (1989). Planning and implementing programs for the gifted. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Bricklin, P. M. (1983). Working with parents of leaming-disabled/gifted children. In L. H. Fox, L. Brody and D. Tobin (Eds.), Leaming-disabled/gifted children: Identification and programming (pp. 243-260). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
14. Callahan, C. M. (1983). Issues in evaluating programs for the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27(1), 3-7.
15. Callahan, C. M. (1986). Asking the right questions: The central issue in evaluating programs for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(1), 38-42.
16. Callahan, C. M., and Caldwell, M. S. (1995). A practitioner’s guide to evaluating programs for the gifted. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC).
17. Callahan, C. M., Covert, R., Aylesworth, M. S., and Vaneo, P. (1981). Evaluating a local gifted program: A cooperative effort. Exceptional Children, 48(2), 157-163.
18. Carter, K. R. (1991). Evaluation of gifted programs. In N. K. Buchanan, «Se J. F. Feldhusen (Eds.), Conducting research and evaluation in gifted education: A handbook of methods and applications (pp. 245-274). New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Carter, K. R., and Kuechenmeister, M. A. (1986). Evaluating the consequences of participating in a gifted pullout program. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 9(4), 265-275.
20. Chalfant, J. C. (1987). Providing services to all students with learning problems: Implications for policy and programs. In S. Vaughn and C. S. Bos (Ed.), Research in learning disabilities: Issues and future directions (pp. 239-251). Boston, MA: College-Hill.
21. Clements, C., Lundell, F., and Hishinuma, E. S. (1994). Serving the gifted dyslexic and gifted at risk: Using differentiated-integrated curricula and enrichment. Gifted Child Today, 17(4), 12-14, 16-17 and 36-37.
22. Correa, V. I., and Weismantel, J. (1991). Multicultural issues related to families with an exceptional child. In M. J. Fine (Ed.), Collaboration with parents of exceptional children (pp. 83-102). Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing Co., Inc.
23. Dangel, H. L., and Walker, J. J. (1991). An assessment of the needs of parents of gifted students for parent education programs. Roeper Review, 14(1), 40-41.
24. Davis, G. A., and Rimm, S. B. (1989). Education of the gifted and talented (2nd ed,). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25. Dettmer, P. (1985), Gifted program scope, structure and evaluation. Roeper Review, 7(3), 146-152.
26. Dorsel, T. N., and Wages, C. (1993). Gifted, residential education: Outcomes are largely favorable, but there are some cautions. Roeper Review, 15(4), 239-242.
27. Dunst, C. J., and Paget, K. D. (1991). Parent-professional partnerships and family empowerment. In M. J. Fine (Ed.), Collaboration with parents of exceptional children (pp. 25-44). Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing Co., Inc.
28. Fowler Jr., F. J. (1988). Survey research methods (rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
29. Fox, L. H., Brody, L., and Tobin, D. (Eds.). (1983). Learning-disabled gifted children: Identification and programming. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
30. Hartley, D. T. (1993). John Adam Hartley: An ADD story. Gifted Child Today, 16(2), 34-37.
31. Hishinuma, E. S. (1991). ASSETS School: Serving the needs of the gifted/learning disabled. Gifted Child Today, 14(5), 36-38.
32. Hishinuma, E. S. (1993). Counseling gifted/at risk and gifted/dyslexic youngsters. Gifted Child Today, 16(1), 30-33.
33. Hishinuma, E. S. (1996). Motivating the gifted/underachiever: Implementing reward menus and behavioral contracts within an integrated approach. Gifted Child Today, 79(4), 30-35, 43-48.
34. Hishinuma, E. S., and Tadaki, S. (1996). Addressing diversity of the gifted/at risk: Characteristics for identification. Gifted Child Today, 19(5), 20-25, 28-29,45 and 50.
35. House, E. R., and Lapan, S., (1994). Evaluation of programs for disadvantaged gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17(4), 441-466.
36. Hunsaker, S. L., and Callahan, C. M. (1993). Evaluation of gifted programs: Current practices. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(2), 190-200.
37. Isaac, S., and Michael, W. B. (1981). Handbook in research and evaluation (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: EdITS Publishers.
38. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Education. (1994). The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
39. Kaplan, S. N. (1986). The grid: A mode! to construct differentiated curriculum for the gifted. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 180-193). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
40. Kataoka, J., and Patton, J. R. (1989). Teaching exceptional learners: An integrated approach. Science and Children, 27(1), 48-50.
41. Keirouz, K. S. (1990). Concerns of parents of gifted children: A research review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(2), 56-63.
42. Kitano, M. K., and LeVine, E. S. (1989). For parents: Recognizing and changing inappropriate services through an interactional approach, Roeper Review, 12(2), 108-111.
43. LaFrance, E. B. (1997). The gifted/dyslexic child: Characterizing and addressing strengths and weaknesses. Annals of Dyslexia, 47, 163-184.
44. Lapan, S. D. (1989). Guidelines for developing and evaluating gifted programs. Roeper Review, 11(3), 167-169.
45. Lynch, E. W., and Lewis, R. B. (1987). Multicultural considerations. In K. A. Kavale, S. R. Fomess, and M. Bender (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities, Vol. I: Dimensions and diagnosis (pp. 399-416). Boston, MA: College-Hill.
46. Mathews, F. N., and Bums, J. M. (1992). A parent evaluation of a public preschool gifted program. Roeper Review, 15(2), 69-72.
47. McFadyen, A., and Hughes, M. (1996). A summer school for learning disabled children: Description and evaluation. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(3), 124-128.
48. Mitchell, B. S., and Gluck, D. (1986). Pyramid Project needs assessment: A beginning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 9(3), 209-223.
49. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
50. National Education Goals Panel. (1997). Summary: 1997 mathematics and science achievement for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Author.
51. Nielson, M. E., and Buchanan, N. K. (1991). Evaluating gifted programs with locally constructed instruments. In N. K. Buchanan, and J. F. Feldhusen (Eds.), Conducting research and evaluation in gifted education: A handbook of methods and applications (pp. 275-310). New York: Teachers College Press.
52. Nunnally, J. C., and Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
53. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
54. Olszewski-Kubilius, P., and Yasumoto, J. (1995). Factors affecting the academic choices of academically talented middle school students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 75(3), 298-318.
55. Orton Dyslexia Society. (1997). Informed instruction for reading success: Foundations for teacher preparation: A position paper of the Orton Dyslexia Society. Baltimore, MD: Author.
56. Popham, W. J. (1993). Educational evaluation (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
57. Purcell, J. H. (1993). The effects of the elimination of gifted and talented programs on participating students and their parents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(4), 177-187.
58. Purcell, J. H. (1995). Gifted education at a crossroads: The program status study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(2), 57-65.
59. Reis, S. M., Neu, T. W., McGuire, J. M. (1995). Talents in two places: Case studies of high ability students with learning disabilities who have achieved. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
60. Renzulli, J. S., Reid, B. D., and Gubbins, E. J. (1994). Setting an agenda: Research priorities for the gifted and talented through the year 2000. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
61. Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., and Reis, S. M. (1982). Curriculum compacting: An essential strategy for working with gifted students. The Elementary School Journal, 82(3), 185-194.
62. Robinson, S. M. (1999). Meeting the needs of students who are gifted and have learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34(4), 195-204.
63. Shaywitz, S. E. (1996). Dyslexia. Scientific American, 11, 98-104.
64. Simon, S. B., Howe, L. W., and Kirschenbaum, H. (1972). Values clarification. New York: Dobb, Mead and Co.
65. Slingerland, B. H. (1976-1985). Basics in scope and sequence of a multi-sensory approach to language arts for specific language disability children: A guide for primary teachers. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.
66. Strickland, B. B., and Turnbull, A. P. (1990). Developing and implementing individualized education programs (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Co.
67. Supplee, P. L. (1990). Reaching the gifted underachiever: Program strategy and design. New York: Teachers College Press.
68. Tomlinson, C. A., and Callahan, C. M. (1994). Planning effective evaluations for programs for the gifted. Roeper Review, 77(1), 46-51.
69. Vespi, L., and Yewchuk, C. (1992). A phenomenological study of the social/emotional characteristics of gifted learning disabled children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 76(1), 55-72.
70. West, T. G. (1991). In the mind’s eye: Visual thinkers, gifted people with learning difficulties, computer images, and the ironies of creativity’. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
71. Whitmore, J. R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
72. Wingert, P., and Kantrowitz, B. (1997, October 27). Why Andy couldn’t read. Newsweek, 56-64.
73. Yoshimoto, R. (1997). Phonemes, phonetics, and phonograms: Advanced language structures for students with learning disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29(3), 43-48.
74. Yoshimoto, R., and Lundell, F. (1992, May). Integration of counseling modalities. Presentation at the 1992 Annual Conference of the AEGUS, New Rochelle, New York.
75. Yoshimoto, R., and Raissle, J. (1993, November). An integrated model of counseling in the classroom for dyslexic students. Presentation at the 44th Annual Conference of the Orton Dyslexic Society, New Orleans, LA.