Entropy generation minimisation and exergy analysis approaches for aerospace applications - A review

54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting

Volumn 0, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Hayes, David ^a   Lone, Mudassir ^a   Whidborne, James F ^a   Coetzee, Etienne ^b  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b AIRBUS OPERATIONS LTD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE APPLICATIONS; AVIATION; EXERGY;

AEROSPACE DOMAIN; ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES; ENTIRE SYSTEM; ENTROPY GENERATION; EXERGY ANALYSIS; IMPROVE PERFORMANCE; SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS; THERMODYNAMIC SYSTEMS;

ENTROPY;

EID: 85007463505     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-0866     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (90)

1. ATAG, “A sustainable flightpath towards reducing emissions,” Tech. Rep. November, Air Transport Acation Group, UNFCCC Climate Talks, Doha, 2012.
2. Agency, I. E., “Transport, Energy and CO2,” Tech. rep., 2009.
3. Baehr, H. D., Thermodynamik: Eine Einführung in die Grundlagen und ihre technischen Anwendungen, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.
4. Ayres, R. U., Ayres, L. W., and Martinas, K., “Eco-Thermodynamics: Exergy and Life Cycle Analysis,” 1996, pp. 49.
5. Bejan, A., “Fundamentals of exergy analysis, entropy generation minimization, and the generation of flow architecture,” International Journal of Energy Research, Vol. 26, No. 7, jun 2002, pp. 545–565.
6. Camberos, J. A. and Moorhouse, D. J., “Systems engineering in terms of exergy,” Collection of Technical Papers - 39th AIAA Thermophysics Conference, Vol. 1, 2007, pp. 500–510.
7. Sciubba, E. and Wall, G., “A brief commented history of exergy from the beginnings to 2004,” International Journal of Thermodynamics, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2007, pp. 1–26.
8. Periannan, V., Investigation of the Effects of Various Energy and Exergy-Based Objectives / Figures of Merit on the Optimal Design of High Performance Aircraft System, Ph.D. thesis, 2005.
9. Periannan, V., von Spakovsky, M. R., and Moorhouse, D. J., “Investigation of the Effects of Various Energy and Exergy- Based Figures of Merit on the Optimal Design of a High Performance Aircraft System,” Advanced Energy Systems, Vol. 2006, ASME, 2006, pp. 337–347.
10. Periannan, V., Von Spakovsky, M. R., and Moorhouse, D. J., “A study of various energy- And exergy-based optimisation metrics for the design of high performance aircraft systems,” Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 112, No. 1134, 2008, pp. 449–458.
11. Szargut, J., Morris, D., and Steward, F., Exergy analysis of thermal, chemical, and metallurgical processes, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1st ed., 1988.
12. Bejan, A., Entropy Generation Minimization: The Method of Thermodynamic Optimization of Finite-Size Systems and Finite-Time Processes, CRC Press, 1st ed., 1995.
13. Carnot, S., Réflexions sur la puissance motrice du feu et sur les machines propres à développer cette puissance, Gauthier- Villars, 1824.
14. Haywood, R. W., “Critical Review of the theorems of thermodynamic availability, with concise formulations. - 2. Irreversibility,” 1974.
15. Rogers, G. and Mayhew, Y., Engineering Thermodynamics: Work and Heat Transfer, Longman, 4th ed., 1992.
16. Gaggioli, R. A., Richardson, D. H., and Bowman, A. J., “Available EnergyPart I: Gibbs Revisited,” Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Vol. 124, No. 2, 2002, pp. 105.
17. Gaggioli, R. A. and Paulus, D. M., “Available EnergyPart II: Gibbs Extended,” Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Vol. 124, No. 2, 2002, pp. 110.
18. Bejan, A., “Entropy generation minimization: The new thermodynamics of finite-size devices and finite-time processes,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 79, No. 3, 1996, pp. 1191.
19. Roth, B. A., A Theoretical Treatment of Technical Risk in Modern Propulsion System Design A Theoretical Treatment of Technical Risk in Modern Propulsion System Design, Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2000.
20. Doty, J. H., Camberos, J. A., and Moorhouse, D. J., “Benefits of exergy-based analysis for aerospace engineering applications: Part 1,” 40th AIAA Thermophysics Conference, 2008.
21. Edwards, C. F., “Energy Tutorial: Exergy 101,” Stanford University, GCEP Research Symposium, 2012, p. 26.
22. Bejan, A., “Architecture from exergy-based global optimization: Tree-shaped flows and energy systems for aircraft,” 8th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, 2000.
23. Giurgiutiu, V., “Flight structures fundamental research trends and directions,” Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 113, No. 1144, 2009, pp. 331–337.
24. Camberos, J. A. and Moorhouse, D. J., Exergy Analysis and Design Optimization for Aerospace Vehicles and Systems, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1st ed., 2011.
25. Smith, K., Morphing Wing Fighter Aircraft Synthesis / Design Optimization, Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2009.
26. Glansdorff, P., Jaumotte, A., and Baland, J., “Sur la puissance disponible et la rendement de propulsion des moteurs a reaction par jets (in French),” Bull. Acad. Roy. Belg. Cl. des Sc. 5me Serie, Vol. 41, No. 12, 1955, pp. 1264–1280.
27. Bauer, B., “Critical remarks on the definition of jet engines propulsive efficiency (in German),” Z. Flugwiss, Vol. 18, No. 5, 1970, pp. 158–171.
28. Maltry, W., “Beitrag zur Anwendung des Zweiten Hauptsatzes auf lufttechnische Prozesse (In German),” Luft- u. Kältetechn, Vol. 7, 1971, pp. 227–230.
29. Clarke, J. M. and Horlock, J. H., “Availability and propulsion,” ARCHIVE: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 1959-1982 (vols 1-23), Vol. 17, No. 4, 1975, pp. 223–232.
30. Lewis, J., “Propulsive efficiency from an energy utilization standpoint,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 13, 1976, pp. 299–302.
31. Li, R. and Qiu, X., “Exergy Analysis of Aeroengine and its significance./Journal of Aerospace Power,” Journal of Aerospace Power, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1992, pp. 169–172.
32. Bejan, A., “Entropy Generation Minimization, Exergy Analysis, and the Constructal Law,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Vol. 38, No. 2, dec 2012, pp. 329–340.
33. Dincer, I. and Rosen, M. A., “Exergy Analysis of Aircraft Flight Systems,” Exergy - Energy, Environment, and Sustainable Development, chap. 19, Elsevier, 2nd ed., 2013, pp. 383-392.
34. Marley, C. D. and Riggins, D. W., “Exergy Analysis of a Turbojet Engine Modeled as a Lumped Parameter System,” 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virigina, jan 2012.
35. Ehyaei, M., Anjiridezfuli, A., and Rosen, M. A., “Exergetic analysis of an aircraft turbojet engine with an afterburner,” Thermal Science, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2013, pp. 1181–1194.
36. Doty, J. H., Camberos, J. A., and Moorhouse, D. J., “Designed experiments: Statistical approach to energy- and exergybased optimization,” 39th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, 2009.
37. Roth, B. A., “Work transfer analysis of turbojet and turbofan engines,” Proceedings of the 40th Joint Propulsion Conference, . . ., 2004.
38. Roth, B. A., “Work potential perspective of engine component performance,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 18, No. 6, 2002, pp. 1183–1190.
39. Roth, B. A. and Mavris, D. N., “Method for propulsion technology impact evaluation via thermodynamic work potential,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2003, pp. 56–61.
40. Riggins, D. W., “Evaluation of performance loss methods for high-speed engines and engine components,” 1997.
41. Riggins, D. W., McClinton, C. R., and Vitt, P. H., “Thrust losses in hypersonic engines part 1: Methodology,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1997, pp. 281–287.
42. Riggins, D. W., “Thrust losses in hypersonic engines part 2: Applications,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1997, pp. 288–295.
43. Brilliant, H., “Analysis of scramjet engines using exergy methods,” 31st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA, 1995, p. 17.
44. Markell, K. C., Exergy Methods for the Generic Analysis and Optimization of Hypersonic Vehicle Concepts, Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2005.
45. Markell, K. C., Brewer, K. M., and von Spakovsky, M. R., “Exergy Methods Applied to the Integrated Mission-Level Analysis and Optimization of Hypersonic Vehicle Concepts,” Volume 6: Energy Systems: Analysis, Thermodynamics and Sustainability, Vol. 6, ASME, 2007, pp. 265–277.
46. Tang, J., Bao, W., and Yu, D., “The Theoretical Treatment of Comparison of Performance between two scramjet engines with Energy-bypass based on Exergy Method,” 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2008.
47. Grönstedt, T., Irannezhad, M., Lei, X., Thulin, O., and Lundbladh, A., “First and Second Law Analysis of Future Aircraft Engines,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Vol. 136, No. 3, nov 2013, pp. 031202.
48. Schmitz, O. and Hornung, M., “Unified Applicable Propulsion System Performance Metrics,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Vol. 135, No. 11, sep 2013, pp. 111201.
49. Oswatitsch, K., Contributions to the development of gasdynamics., Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsges GmbH, 1980.
50. Paulus, D. M. and Gaggioli, R. A., “The Exergy of Lift and Aircraft Exergy Flow Diagrams,” International Journal of Thermodynamics, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2003, pp. 149–156.
51. Greene, G. C., “An Entropy Method for Induced Drag Minimization,” Tech. rep., sep 1989.
52. Figliola, R. S., “Energy-Based Design Methodology for Air Vehicle Systems: Aerodynamic Correlation Study,” Air Force Office of Scientific Research, 2005.
53. Riggins, D. W., Taylor, T. M., and Moorhouse, D. J., “The second-law based analysis of aerospace vehicle performance,” Collection of Technical Papers - 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Vol. 6, 2006, pp. 4020–4040.
54. Nixon, D., “A Relationship Between Wave Drag and Induced Drag,” Tech. rep., sep 2003.
55. Nixon, D., “Far field effects of wing wakes,” Collection of Technical Papers - 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Vol. 22, 2007, pp. 15158–15173.
56. Nixon, D., “Simple adaptive planforms for wings,” SAE Technical Papers, 2004.
57. Monsch, S. C., Li, H., Harris, R., Stewart, J., Figliola, R. S., and Camberos, J. A., “Exergy based design methodology for wing shape optimization and analysis,” Collection of Technical Papers - 39th AIAA Thermophysics Conference, Vol. 1, 2007, pp. 455–464.
58. Monsch, S. C., A study of induced drag and spanwise lift distribution for three-dimensional inviscid flow over a wing, Ph.D. thesis, 2007.
59. Li, H. and Figliola, R. S., “Exergy based design methodology for airfoil shape optimization,” Collection of Technical Papers - 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Vol. 6, 2004, pp. 3700–3707.
60. Li, H., Stewart, J., and Figliola, R. S., “Exergy based design methodology for airfoil shape optimization and wing analysis,” ICAS-Secretariat - 25th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences 2006, Vol. 2, 2006, pp. 731–741.
61. Naterer, G. F. and Camberos, J. A., Entropy Based Design and Analysis of Fluids Engineering Systems, CRC Press, 1st ed., 2008.
62. Naterer, G. F. and Camberos, J. A., “The role of entropy and the second law in computational thermofluids,” 35th AIAA Thermophysics Conference, 2001.
63. Camberos, J. A., “Exergy Analysis Applied to External Aerodynamics of High-Speed Flow,” 9th AIAA/ASME Joint Thermophysics and Heat Transfer Conference, AIAA, 2006.
64. Camberos, J. A., “Entropy concavity, the second law, and the concept of exergy in thermophysics,” 33rd AIAA Thermophysics Conference, AIAA, Norfolk, VA, 1999.
65. Camberos, J. A., “A review of numerical methods in light of the second law of thermodynamics,” Collection of Technical Papers - 39th AIAA Thermophysics Conference, Vol. 1, 2007, pp. 410–444.
66. Camberos, J. A., “On the construction of exergy balance equations for availability analyses,” 8th AIAA/ASME Joint Thermophysics and Heat Transfer Conference, 2002.
67. Alabi, K., Ladeinde, F., Moorhouse, D. J., Camberos, J. A., and Brook, S., “A comparison of empirical and CFD based exergy modelling for the airframe,” ICAS, 2006, pp. 1–10.
68. Adeyinka, O. B. and Naterer, G. F., “Modeling of Entropy Production in Turbulent Flows,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 126, No. 6, 2004, pp. 893.
69. Alabi, K., Ladeinde, F., Moorhouse, D. J., and Camberos, J. A., “Assessing CFD modeling of entropy generation for the air frame subsystem in an integrated aircraft design/synthesis procedure,” Proceedings of the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, No. January, 2006, pp. 1–19.
70. Bejan, A., “Constructal theory: Tree-shaped flows and energy systems for aircraft,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2003, pp. 43–48.
71. Doty, J. H. and Camberos, J. A., “Statistical, modular systems integration using combined energy & exergy concepts,” 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 2010.
72. Riggins, D. W., Taylor, T. M., Terhune, L., and Moorhouse, D. J., “Methods for the design of energy efficient high speed aerospace vehicles,” Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 111, No. 1119, 2007, pp. 297–309.
73. Von Spakovsky, M. R., “The Use of Exergy and Decomposition Techniques in the Development of Generic Analysis and Optimization Methodologies Applicable to the Synthesis/Design of Aircraft / Aerospace Systems,” Tech. rep., Virginia Tech, 2003.
74. Smith, K., Butt, J., Von Spakovsky, M. R., and Moorhouse, D. J., “A study of the benefits of using morphing wing technology in fighter aircraft systems,” Collection of Technical Papers - 39th AIAA Thermophysics Conference, Vol. 2, 2007, pp. 1497–1508.
75. Butt, J., A study of morphing wing effectiveness in fighter aircraft using exergy analysis and global optimization techniques, Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2005.
76. Brewer, K. M., Exergy Methods for the Mission-Level Analysis and Optimization of Generic Hypersonic Vehicles, Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2006.
77. Popov, A. V., Grigorie, L. T., Botez, R. M., Mamou, M., and Mébarki, Y., “Real Time Morphing Wing Optimization Validation Using Wind-Tunnel Tests,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 47, No. 4, jul 2010, pp. 1346–1355.
78. Rancruel, D. F., A Decomposition Strategy Based on Thermoeconomic Isolation Applied to the Optimal Synthesis / Design and Operation of an Advanced Fighter Aircraft System A Decomposition Strategy Based on Thermoeconomic Operation of an Advanced Fighter Aircraft System, Ph.D. thesis, 2003.
79. Rancruel, D. F. and Von Spakovsky, M. R., “Advanced fighter aircraft sub-systems optimal synthesis/design and operation: Airframe integration using a thermoeconomic approach,” Collection of Technical Papers - 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Vol. 6, 2004, pp. 3403–3415.
80. Moorhouse, D. J., Sanders, B., Von Spakovsky, M. R., and Butt, J., “Benefits and design challenges of adaptive structures for morphing aircraft,” Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 110, No. 1105, 2006, pp. 157–162.
81. Moorhouse, D. J. and Pratt, D. M., “Methods to Optimize for Energy Efficiency Developed by Presented by : Wright- Patterson AFB . . . ,” Tech. Rep. May, 2011.
82. Pellegrini, L. F., Gandolfi, R., Da Silva, G. A. L., and De Oliveira, S., “Exergy analysis as a tool for decision making in aircraft systems design,” Collection of Technical Papers - 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Vol. 23, 2007, pp. 16485–16496.
83. Berg, F., Principles for Aircraft Exergy Mapping submitted by, Ph.D. thesis, University of Bath, 2013.
84. Berg, F., Balchin, M., and Keogh, P., “Elucidation of Aircraft Energy Use Through Time-Variant Exergy Analysis,” Tech. rep., oct 2011.
85. Berg, F., Balchin, M., and Keogh, P., “New Principles for Dynamic Aircraft Exergy Mapping,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 50, No. 4, jul 2013, pp. 1088–1098.
86. Gandolfi, R., Pellegrini, L. F., Da Silva, G. A. L., and De Oliveira, S., “Exergy analysis applied to a complete flight mission of a commercial aircraft,” 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2008.
87. Etele, J. and Rosen, M. A., “Exergy losses for aerospace engines - Effect of reference-environments on assessment accuracy,” 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA, Reno, Nevada, 2000.
88. Gandolfi, R., Pellegrini, L. F., and De Oliveira, S., “More electric aircraft analysis using exergy as a design comparison tool,” 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 2010.
89. Paulus, D. M. and Gaggioli, R. A., “Rational objective functions for vehicles,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2003, pp. 27–34.
90. De Oliveira, S., Exergy, Green Energy and Technology, Springer London, London, 2013.