How readers understand causal and correlational expressions used in news headlines

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 1-14

  Adams, Rachel C ^a   Sumner, Petroc ^a   Vivian Griffiths, Solveiga ^a   Barrington, Amy ^a   Williams, Andrew ^b   Boivin, Jacky ^a   Chambers, Christopher D ^a   Bott, Lewis ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Causal inference; Correlation and causation; Science and the media; Science communication

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MASS MEDIUM; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COMMUNICATION; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS MEDIA; MIDDLE AGED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85007247125     PISSN: 1076898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/xap0000100     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bleske-Rechek, A., Morrison, K. M., & Heidtke, L. D. (2015). Causal inference from descriptions of experimental and non-experimental research: Public understanding of correlation-versus-causation. The Journal of General Psychology, 142, 48 -70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2014.977216
2. Bosely, S. (2014, May 15). British Medical Journal rejects scare stories on statins following plea from Oxford professor. Retrieved from http:// www.theguardian.com/society/2014/may/15/statins-bmj-statementprofessor-collins-side-effects
3. Brechman, J. M., Lee, C. J., & Cappella, J. N. (2009). Lost in translation? A comparison of cancer-genetics reporting in the press release and its subsequent coverage in the press. Science Communication, 30, 453-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547009332649
4. Budescu, D. V., & Wallsten, T. S. (1985). Consistency in interpretation of probabilistic phrases. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 391- 405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90007-X
5. Cofield, S. S., Corona, R. V., & Allison, D. B. (2010). Use of causal language in observational studies of obesity and nutrition. Obesity Facts, 3, 353-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000322940
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
7. Cooper, B. E. J., Lee, W. E., Goldacre, B. M., & Sanders, T. A. B. (2012). The quality of the evidence for dietary advice given in UK national newspapers. Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), 21, 664-673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662511401782
8. Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042
9. Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 274-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920
10. Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781
11. Dor, D. (2003). On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 695-721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00134-0
12. Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., Chang, E. P., & Pillai, R. (2014). The effects of subtle misinformation in news headlines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20, 323-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xap0000028
13. Ecker, U. K., Swire, B., & Lewandowsky, S. (2014). Correcting misinformation-A challenge for education and cognitive science. In D. N. Rapp & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G±Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
15. Gonon, F., Bezard, E., & Boraud, T. (2011). Misrepresentation of neuroscience data might give rise to misleading conclusions in the media: The case of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. PLoS ONE, 6, e14618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014618
16. Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Haneef, R., Lazarus, C., Ravaud, P., Yavchitz, A., & Boutron, I. (2015). Interpretation of results of studies evaluating an intervention highlighted in Google health news: A cross-sectional study of news. PLoS ONE, 10, e0140889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140889
18. NHS Digital. (2009). NHS immunisation statistics-England, 2008-09. London, UK: Department of Health, Health and Social Care Information Centre. http://digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB00220
19. Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2002). Young children's naïve thinking about the biological world. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
20. Kennedy, G. (2002). Variation in the distribution of modal verbs in the British National Corpus. In R. Reppen, S. Fitzmaurice, & D. Biber (Eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation (pp. 73-90). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/scl.9.06ken
21. Kiernan, V. (2006). Embargoed science. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
22. Kitzinger, J. (2004). Framing abuse: Media influence and public understanding of sexual violence against children. London, United Kingdom: Pluto Press.
23. Lazarus, C., Haneef, R., Ravaud, P., & Boutron, I. (2015). Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15, 85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0079-x
24. Leveson, B. (2012). An inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the press. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/leveson-inquiry-report-into-the-culture-practices-and-ethics-of-the-press
25. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
26. Love, J., Selker, R., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Dropmann, D., Verhagen, A. J., . . . Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2015). JASP (Version 0.7) [Computer software].
27. Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 61-64.
28. Mueller, J. F., & Coon, H. M. (2013). Undergraduates' ability to recognize correlational and causal language before and after explicit instruction. Teaching of Psychology, 40, 288 -293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0098628313501038
29. Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.289
30. Myers, J. L., Shinjo, M., & Duffy, S. A. (1987). Degree of causal relatedness and memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 453-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(87)90101-X
31. Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (1994). Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular reports of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 947-967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310909
32. Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., & Korpan, C. A. (2003). University students' interpretation of media reports of science and its relationship to background knowledge, interest, and reading difficulty. Public Understanding of Science, 12, 123-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09636625030122001
33. Pickering, M. J., & Majid, A. (2007). What are implicit causality and consequentiality? Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 780-788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960601119876
34. Ramsay, M. E. (2013). Measles: The legacy of low vaccine coverage. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 98, 752-754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-304292
35. Rehder, B., & Hastie, R. (2001). Causal knowledge and categories: The effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 323-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.323
36. Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
37. Schwitzer, G. (2008). How do US journalists cover treatments, tests, products, and procedures? An evaluation of 500 stories. PLoS Medicine, 5, e95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050095
38. Schwitzer, G. (2010). Covering medical research: A guide to reporting on studies. Columbia, MO: Association of Healthcare Journalists.
39. Science Media Centre. (2012). 10 best practice guidelines for reporting science and health stories. London, UK: Author. http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/10-best-practiceguidelines-for-science-and-health-reporting.pdf
40. Stewart, A. J., Pickering, M. J., & Sanford, A. J. (1998). Implicit consequentiality. In M. A. Gernsbacher & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1031-1036). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Straight Statistics and Sense About Science. (2010). Making sense of statistics. Retrieved from http://www.senseaboutscience.org/data/files/resources/1/MSofStatistics.pdf
42. Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 55-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662504042690
43. Sumner, P., Vivian-Griffiths, S., Boivin, J., Williams, A., Bott, L., Adams, R. C., . . . Chambers, C. D. (2016). Exaggerations and caveats in press releases and health-related science news. Manuscript submitted for review.
44. Sumner, P., Vivian-Griffiths, S., Boivin, J., Williams, A., Venetis, C. A., Davies, A., . . . Chambers, C. D. (2014). The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: Retrospective observational study. British Medical Journal, 349, g7015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7015
45. Taylor, J. W., Long, M., Ashley, E., Denning, A., Gout, B., Hansen, K., . . . Newton, P. M. (2015). When medical news comes from press releases-A case study of pancreatic cancer and processed meat. PLoS ONE, 10, e0127848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127848
46. Williams, A., & Clifford, S. (2009). Mapping the field: Specialist science news journalism in the UK national media. Cardiff, Wales: Science, Health and the Media Expert Group, Cardiff University. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265659706_Mapping_the_Field_Specialist_Science:News_Journalism_in_the_UK_National_Media
47. Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L. M., Casella, S. L., Kennedy, A. T., & Larson, R. J. (2009). Press releases by academic medical centers: Not so academic? Annals of Internal Medicine, 150, 613-618. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00007
48. Yavchitz, A., Boutron, I., Bafeta, A., Marroun, I., Charles, P., Mantz, J., & Ravaud, P. (2012). Misrepresentation of randomized controlled trials in press releases and news coverage: A cohort study. PLoS Medicine, 9, e1001308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001308
49. Zwieg, M., & DeVoto, E. (2009). Observational studies-Does the language fit the evidence?-Association versus causation. Retrieved from http://www.healthnewsreview.org/toolkit/tips-for-understanding-studies/does-the-language-fit-the-evidence-association-versus-causation/