Classic versus millennial medical lab anatomy

Clinical Anatomy

Volumn 27, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 988-993

  Benninger, Brion ^a,b,c,d,e,f   Matsler, Nik ^a   Delamarter, Taylor ^a  

^a Western University of Health Sciences   (United States)

^b WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^c Graduate of College of Dental Medicine   (United States)

^d Samaritan Health Services   (United States)

^e OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

anatomy; cadaver; education; integration; laparoscope; millennial; surgical; technology; ultrasound; vertical

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CURRICULUM; ECHOGRAPHY; EMBALMING; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LAPAROSCOPY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEACHING; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 85007200846     PISSN: 08973806     EISSN: 10982353     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ca.22260     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Biasutto S, Ignaciocaussa L, Estebancriadodelrio L. 2006. Teaching anatomy: Cadavers vs. computers? Ann Anat Anatomischer Anzeiger 188:187–190.
2. Brenton H, Hernandez J, Bello F, Strutton P, Purkayastha S, Firth T, Darzi A. 2007. Using multimedia and web3D to enhance anatomy teaching. Comput Educ 49:32–53.
3. Fitzpatrick, CM, Kolesari GL, Brasel KJ. 2001. Teaching anatomy with surgeons' tools: Use of the laparoscope in clinical anatomy. Clin Anat 14:349–353.
4. Jastrow H, Vollrath L. 2003. Teaching and learning gross anatomy using modern electronic media based on the visible human project. Clin Anat 16:44–54.
5. Korf H, Wicht H, Snipes R, Timmermans J, Paulsen F, Rune G, Baumgartvogt E. 2008. The dissection course—Necessary and indispensable for teaching anatomy to medical students. Ann Anat Anatomischer Anzeiger 190:16–22.
6. McLachlan JC. 2004. New path for teaching anatomy: Living anatomy and medical imaging vs. dissection. Anat Rec 281B:4–5.
7. McLachlan JC, Patten D. 2006. Anatomy teaching: Ghosts of the past, present and future. Med Educ 40:243–253.
8. McMenamin PG. 2008. Body painting as a tool in clinical anatomy teaching. Anat Sci Educ 1:139–144.
9. Older J. 2004. Anatomy: A must for teaching the next generation. Surgeon 2:79–90.
10. Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. 2010. The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ 3:83–93.
11. Tam MDBS, Hart AR, Williams S, Heylings D, Leinster S. 2009. Is learning anatomy facilitated by computer-aided learning? A review of the literature. Med Teacher 31:E393–E396.
12. Teichgräber UKM, Meyer JMA, Poulsen Nautrup C, Rautenfeld DB. 1996. Ultrasound anatomy: A practical teaching system in human gross anatomy. Med Educ 30:296–298.
13. Turmezei TD, Tam MDBS, Loughna S. 2009. A survey of medical students on the impact of a new digital imaging library in the dissection room. Clin Anat 22:761–769.