Adhesiveness of opportunistic Staphylococcus aureus to materials used in dental office: In vitro study

Microbial Pathogenesis

Volumn 103, Issue , 2017, Pages 129-134

  Merghni, Abderrahmen ^a   Bekir, Karima ^a   Kadmi, Yassine ^b,c,d   Dallel, Ines ^e   Janel, Sébastien ^f   Bovio, Simone ^f   Barois, Nicolas ^f   Lafont, Frank ^f,g   Mastouri, Maha ^a,h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONASTIR   (Tunisia)

^b UNIVERSITÉ D'ARTOIS   (France)

^c Cité scientifique   (France)

^d UNIV LILLE   (France)

^e Dento Facial Orthopedics Department of Monastir Dental Clinic   (Tunisia)

^f UAR2014 Us 41 Plateformes Lilloises en Biol S BioImaging Ctr Lille   (France)

^g LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^h FATTOUMA BOURGUIBA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Tunisia)

Author keywords

Adhesion forces; Biofilm; Inert materials; Staphylococcus aureus; Surface characteristics

Indexed keywords

CRYSTAL VIOLET; POLYETHYLENE; POLYVINYLCHLORIDE; STAINLESS STEEL;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BIOFILM; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL FACILITY; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; SURFACE PROPERTY; CROSS INFECTION; HUMAN; MICROBIOLOGY; OPPORTUNISTIC INFECTION; PHYSIOLOGY; STAPHYLOCOCCUS INFECTION; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

BACTERIAL ADHESION; BIOFILMS; CROSS INFECTION; DENTAL OFFICES; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; OPPORTUNISTIC INFECTIONS; STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 85007143964     PISSN: 08824010     EISSN: 10961208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.12.014     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. [1] Rowland, B.M., Bacterial contamination of dental unit waterlines: what is your dentist spraying into your mouth?. Clin. Microbiol. Newsl. 25 (2003), 73–77.
2. [2] Atlas, R.M., Williams, J.F., Huntington, M.K., Legionella contamination of dental-unit waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61 (1995), 1208–1213.
3. [3] Boyd, R.D., Verran, J., Jones, M.V., Bhakoo, M., Use of the atomic force microscope to determine the effect of substratum surface topography on bacterial adhesion. Langmuir 18 (2002), 2343–2346.
4. [4] Garrett, T.R., Bhakoo, M., Zhang, Z., Bacterial adhesion and biofilms on surfaces. Prog. Nat. Sci. 18 (2008), 1049–1056.
5. [5] Chmielewski, R.A.N., Frank, J.F., Biofilm formation and control in food processing facilities. Com. Rev. Food. Sci. Food. S. IFT 2 (2003), 22–32.
6. [6] Costerton, J.W., Cheng, K.J., Geesey, G.G., Ladd, T.I., Nickel, J.C., Dasgupta, M., Marrie, T.J., Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 41 (1987), 435–464.
7. [7] Abdallah, M., Benoliel, C., Drider, D., Dhulster, P., Chihib, N.E., Biofilm formation and persistence on abiotic surfaces in the context of food and medical environments. Arch. Microbiol. 196 (2014), 453–472.
8. [8] Cheesbrough, M., District Laboratory Practice in Tropical Countries. Part 2. second ed., 2006, Cambridge University Press, New York. USA, 45–62.
9. [9] Walker, J.T., Bradshaw, D.J., Bennett, A.M., Fulford, M.R., Martin, M.V., Marsh, P.D., Microbial biofilm formation and contamination of dental-unit water systems in general practice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66 (2000), 3363–3367.
10. [10] Bürgers, R., Hahnel, S., Reichert, T.E., Rosentritt, M., Behr, M., Gerlach, T., Handel, G., Gosau, M., Adhesion of Candida albicans to various dental implant surfaces and the influence of salivary pellicle proteins. Acta. Biomater. 6 (2010), 2307–2313.
11. [11] Kurita, H., Kurashina, K., Honda, T., Nosocomial transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus via the surfaces of the dental operatory. Br. Dent. J. 201 (2006), 297–300.
12. [12] Renner, L.D., Weibel, D.B., Physicochemical regulation of biofilm formation. MRS. Bull. 36 (2011), 347–355.
13. [13] Fang, H.H., Chan, K.Y., Xu, L.C., Quantification of bacterial adhesion forces using atomic force microscopy (AFM). J. Microbiol. Methods 40 (2000), 89–97.
14. [14] Mei, L., Busscher, H.J., Van der Mei, H.C., Chen, Y., De Vries, J., Ren, Y., Oral bacterial adhesion forces to biomaterial surfaces constituting the bracket-adhesive enamel junction in orthodontic treatment. Eur. J. Oral. Sci. 117 (2009), 419–426.
15. [15] Keinan, D., Mass, E., Zilberman, U., Absorption of nickel, chromium, and iron by the root surface of primary molars covered with stainless steel crowns. Int. J. Dent., 2010, 2010, 326124.
16. [16] Chadwick, R.G., Comparison of nitrile and latex examination gloves. Br. Dent. J., 196, 2004, 685.
17. [17] Glazer, B., Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fibre posts-a prospective study. J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 66 (2000), 613–618.
18. [18] Lamichhane, A., XU, C., Zhang, F., Dental fiber-post resin base material: a review. J. Adv. Prosthodont 6 (2014), 60–65.
19. [19] Donlan, R.M., Biofilms and device-associated infections. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7 (2001), 277–281.
20. [20] Simões, M., Simoes, L.C., Vieira, M.J., A review of current and emergent biofilm control strategies. LWT-Food. Sci. Technol. 43 (2010), 573–583.
21. [21] Yu, J., Kim, D., Lee, T., Microbial diversity in biofilms on water distribution pipes of different materials. Water Sci. Technol. 61 (2010), 163–171.
22. [22] Bachmann, R.T., Edyvean, R.G.J., AFM study of the colonisation of stainless steel by Aquabacterium commune. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr 58 (2006), 112–118.
23. [23] Pedersen, K., Biofilm development on stainless-steel and PVC surfaces in drinking-water. Water Res. 24 (1990), 239–243.
24. [24] Wingender, J., Flemming, H.-C., Contamination potential of drinking water distribution network biofilms. Water Sci. Technol. 49 (2004), 277–286.
25. [25] Rossoni, E.M.M., Gaylarde, C.C., Comparison of sodium hypochlorite and peracetic acid as sanitizing agents for stainless steel food processing surfaces using epifluorescence microscopy. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 61 (2000), 81–85.
26. [26] Merghni, A., Kammoun, D., Hentati, H., Janel, S., Popoff, M., Lafont, F., Mahjoub, A., Mastouri, M., Quantification of Staphylococcus aureus adhesion forces on various dental restorative materials using atomic force microscopy. Appl. Surf. Sci. 379 (2016), 323–330.
27. [27] Owens, D.K., Wendt, R.C., Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 13 (1969), 1741–1747.
28. [28] Vázquez-Sánchez, D., Habimana, O., Holck, A., Impact of food-related environmental factors on the adherence and biofilm formation of natural Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Curr. Microbiol. 66 (2013), 110–121.
29. [29] Alves, S., Duarte, A., Sousa, S., Domingues, F.C., Study of the major essential oil compounds of Coriandrum sativum against Acinetobacter baumannii and the effect of linalool on adhesion, biofilms and quorum sensing. Biofouling 32 (2016), 155–165.
30. [30] Chen, Y., Harapanahalli, A.K., Busscher, H.J., Norde, W., van der Mei, H.C., Nanoscale cell wall deformation impacts long-range bacterial adhesion forces on surfaces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80 (2014), 637–643.
31. [31] Ovchinnikova, E.S., van der Mei, H.C., Krom, B.P., Busscher, H.J., Exchange of adsorbed serum proteins during adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus to an abiotic surface and Candida albicans hyphae–an AFM study. Colloids. Surf. B. Biointerfaces 110 (2013), 45–50.
32. [32] Katsikogianni, M., Missirlis, Y.F., Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterials and of techniques used in estimating bacteria-material interactions. Eur. Cell. Mater 8 (2004), 37–57.
33. [33] Fröjd, V., Linderbäck, P., Wennerberg, A., Chávez de Paz, L., Svensäter, G., Davies, J.R., Effect of nanoporous TiO2 coating and anodized Ca2+ modification of titanium surfaces on early microbial biofilm formation. BMC Oral Health, 11, 2011, 8.
34. [34] Preedy, E., Perni, S., Nipic, D., Bohinc, K., Prokopovich, P., Surface roughness mediated adhesion forces between borosilicate glass and gram-positive bacteria. Langmuir 30 (2014), 9466–9476.
35. [35] Mei, L., Busscher, H.J., van der Mei, H.C., Ren, Y., Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins. Dent. Mater 27 (2011), 770–778.
36. [36] Hsu, L., Fang, J., Borca-Tasciuc, D., Worobo, R., Moraru, C., The effect of micro- and nanoscale topography on the adhesion of bacterial cells to solid surfaces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79 (2013), 2703–2712.
37. [37] Nan, L., Yang, K., Ren, G., Anti-biofilm formation of a novel stainless steel against Staphylococcus aureus. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. 51 (2015), 356–361.
38. [38] Koseki, H., Yonekura, A., Shida, T., Yoda, I., Horiuchi, H., Morinaga, Y., Yanagihara, K., Sakoda, H., Osaki, M., Tomita, M., Early staphylococcal biofilm formation on solid orthopaedic implant materials: in vitro study. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e107588.
39. [39] Pereni, C.I., Zhao, Q., Liu, Y., Abel, E., Surface free energy effect on bacterial retention. Colloids. Surf. B. Biointerfaces 48 (2006), 143–147.
40. [40] Lerebour, G., Cupferman, S., Bellon-Fontaine, M.N., Adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis to the Episkin reconstructed epidermis model and to an inert 304 stainless steel substrate. J. Appl. Microbiol. 97 (2004), 7–16.
41. [41] Marotta, M., Martino, A., De Rosa, A., Farina, A.E., Carteni, M., De Rosa, M., Degradation of dental plaque glucans and prevention of glucan formation using commercial enzymes. Process. Biochem. 38 (2002), 101–108.