Challenges for global supply chain sustainability: Evidence from conflict minerals reports

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1896-1916

  Kim, Yong H ^a   Davis, Gerald F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85006946468     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2015.0770     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (80)

1. Allen, L., & Pantzalis, C. 1996. Valuation of the operating flexibility of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 27: 633-653.
2. Amemiya, T. 1981. Qualitative response models:Asurvey. Journal of Economic Literature, 19: 1483-1536.
3. Kearney, AT. 2011. Carbon disclosure project: Supply chain report 2011. London, U. K. : CDP.
4. Ball, A. 2013. Walk Free challenges Nintendo with Slavery is not a game campaign. June 21. Available at http:// www. enoughproject. org/blogs/slaveryisnotagame-walkfree-challenges-nintendo. Accessed July 14, 2015.
5. Banerjee, S., Gatchev, V. A., & Spindt, P. A. 2007. Stock market liquidity and firm dividend policy. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42: 369-397.
6. Bansal, P., Gao, J., & Qureshi, I. 2014. The extensiveness of corporate social and environmental commitment across firms over time. Organization Studies, 35: 949-966.
7. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. 2000. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 717-736.
8. Bayer, C. N. 2014. Dodd-Frank Section 1502: Post-filing survey 2014. October 1. Available at http://www. payson. tulane. edu/sites/default/files/content/files/ TulanePaysonS1502PostFilingSurvey. pdf. Accessed August 10, 2015.
9. BBMG. 2014. One year after Rana Plaza collapse consumer habits remain unchanged. April 16. Available at http://bbmg. com/news/bangladesh-title/. Accessed October 3, 2014.
10. Brammer, S., & Millington, A. 2006. Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Business Ethics(Oxford, England), 15: 6-18.
11. Brooks, M. E., Highhouse, S., Russell, S. S., & Mohr, D. C. 2003. Familiarity, ambivalence, and firm reputation: Is corporate fame a double-edged sword? The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 904-914.
12. Brown, B., & Perry, S. 1994. Removing the financial performance halo from fortune's "most admired" companies. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1347-1359.
13. Bushee, B. J., & Miller, G. S. 2012. Investor relations, firm visibility, and investor following. The Accounting Review, 87: 867-897.
14. Campbell, M. C. 1999. Perceptions of price unfairness: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing Research, 36: 187-199.
15. Carter, C. R. 2005. Purchasing social responsibility and firm performance: The key mediating roles of organizational learning and supplier performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35: 177-194.
16. Chandler, A. D., Jr. 1962. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Chasan, E., & Murphy, M. 2014. 743: Average number of suppliers that companies screened for potential use of "conflict minerals. " Wall Street Journal, September 16.
18. Choi, T. Y., & Krause, D. R. 2006. The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 24: 637-652.
19. Coase, R. H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, 4: 386-405.
20. Cohen, L., & Frazzini, A. 2008. Economic links and predictable returns. The Journal of Finance, 63: 1977-2011.
21. Collins, M. J. 1990. A market performance comparison of US firms active in domestic, developed and developing countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 21: 271-287.
22. Davis, G. F. 2015. Celebrating organizationtheory:The afterparty. Journal ofManagement Studies, 52: 309-319.
23. Davis, G. F., & Marquis, C. 2005. Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organization Science, 16: 332-343.
24. Davis, G. F., Whitman, M. V., & Zald, M. N. 2013. Political agency and the responsibility paradox: Multinationals and corporate social responsibility. In B. Maiguashca & R. Marchett(Eds.), Contemporary political agency: Theoryandpractice:92-117. London, U. K. :Routledge.
25. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. 1999. Geographic scope, product diversification, and the corporate performance of Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 711-727.
26. Dickinson, V., & Sommers, G. A. 2012. Which competitive efforts lead to future abnormal economic rents? Using accounting ratios to assess competitive advantage. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 39: 360-398.
27. Fang, L., & Peress, J. 2009. Media coverage and the crosssection of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 64: 2023-2052.
28. Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. 2006. The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 1173-1193.
29. Fombrun, C. J. 1996. Reputation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
30. Fombrun, C. J. 2007. List of lists: A compilation of international corporate reputation ratings. Corporate Reputation Review, 10: 144-153.
31. Geringer, J. M., Beamish, P. W., & daCosta, R. C. 1989. Diversification strategy and internationalization: Implications forMNE performance. StrategicManagement Journal, 10: 109-119.
32. Graffin, S. D., Bundy, J., Porac, J. F., Wade, J. B., & Quinn, D. P. 2013. Falls from grace and the hazards of high status: The 2009 British MP expense scandal and its impact on parliamentary elites. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 313-345.
33. Hart, S. L. 1995. Anatural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20: 986-1014.
34. Heston, S. L., & Rouwenhorst, K. G. 1994. Does industrial structure explain the benefits of international diversification? Journal of Financial Economics, 36: 3-27.
35. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. 1997. International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 767-798.
36. Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., & Moesel, D. D. 1993. Construct validity of an objective(entropy) categorical measure of diversification strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 215-235.
37. Jackson, R. 2011. Low-carbon's missing link. Accountancy Futures, 3: 42-43.
38. Jacquemin, A. P., & Berry, C. H. 1979. Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 27: 359-369.
39. Kang, J. 2013. The relationship between corporate diversification and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 94-109.
40. Karpoff, J. M., Lott, J. R., Jr., & Wehrly, E. W. 2005. The reputational penalties for environmental violations: Empirical evidence. The Journal of Law & Economics, 48: 653-675.
41. Kelly, E., & Dobbin, F. 1998. How affirmative action became diversity management employer response to antidiscrimination law, 1961 to 1996. The American Behavioral Scientist, 41: 960-984.
42. Kim, E.-H., & Lyon, T. P. 2011. Strategic environmental disclosure: Evidence from the DOE's voluntary greenhouse gas registry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61: 311-326.
43. Kim, E.-H., & Lyon, T. P. 2015. Greenwash vs. brownwash: Exaggeration and undue modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure. Organization Science, 26: 705-723.
44. King, B. G. 2008. A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 395-421.
45. King, B. G. 2011. The tactical disruptiveness of social movements sources of market and mediated disruption in corporate boycotts. Social Problems, 58: 491-517.
46. King, B. G., & McDonnell, M.-H. 2015. Good firms, good targets: The relationship between corporate social responsibility, reputation, and activist targeting. In K. Tsutsui, & A. Lim(Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in a globalizing world: 430-454. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
47. Lamming, R., Caldwell, N., & Harrison, D. 2004. Developing the concept of transparency for use in supply relationships. British Journal of Management, 15: 291-302.
48. Locke, R. M. 2003. The promise and perils of globalization: The case of Nike. In T. A. Kochan, & R. Schmalensee(Eds.), Management: Inventing and delivering its future: 39-70. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Love, E. G., & Kraatz, M. 2009. Character, conformity, or the bottom line? How and why downsizing affected corporate reputation. AcademyofManagementJournal, 52: 314-335.
50. McHugh, M., Humphreys, P., & Mclvor, R. 2003. Buyer-supplier relationships and organizational health. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 39: 15-25.
51. National Association of Manufacturers, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, and Business Roundtable v. Securities and Exchange Commission. 2014. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Case 13-5252.
52. Obstfeld, D. 2005. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 100-130.
53. Palepu, K. 1985. Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management Journal, 6: 239-255.
54. Park, S. K. 2014. Targeted social transparency as global corporate strategy. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 35: 87-137.
55. Pfarrer, M. D., Pollock, T. G., & Rindova, V. P. 2010. A tale of two assets: The effects of firm reputation and celebrity on earnings surprises and investors' reactions. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1131-1152.
56. Provan, K. G., & Skinner, S. J. 1989. Interorganizational dependence and control as predictors of opportunism in dealer-supplier relations. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 202-212.
57. Rehbein, K., Waddock, S., & Graves, S. B. 2004. Understanding shareholder activism: Which corporations are targeted? Business & Society, 43: 239-267.
58. Rhee, M., & Haunschild, P. R. 2006. The liability of good reputation: A study of product recalls in the us automobile industry. Organization Science, 17: 101-117.
59. Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P., & Sever, J. M. 2005. Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 1033-1049.
60. Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. 2002. Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 1077-1093.
61. Rosenbloom, S. 2009. At Wal-Mart, labeling to reflect green intent. New York Times, July 15.
62. Salancik, G. R. 1979. Interorganizational dependence and responsiveness to affirmative action: The case of women and defense contractors. Academy of Management Journal, 22: 375-394.
63. Schroeder, R. G., & Flynn, B. B.(Eds.). 2001. High performance manufacturing: Global perspectives. New York, NY: Wiley.
64. SIF & ICCR 2011. Re: Comments regarding file number s7-40-10 on conflict minerals disclosure. March 2. Available at http://www. ussif. org/files/Public-Policy/ Comment-Letters/LettertoSEConConflictMinerals. pdf. Accessed April 5, 2016.
65. Skilton, P. F., & Robinson, J. L. 2009. Traceability and normal accident theory: How does supply network complexity influence the traceability of adverse events? The Journal of Supply ChainManagement, 45: 40-53.
66. Steven, A. B., Dong, Y., & Corsi, T. 2014. Global sourcing and quality recalls:Anempirical study of outsourcingsupplier concentration-product recalls linkages. Journal of Operations Management, 32: 241-253.
67. Strike, M. V., Gao, J., & Bansal, P. 2006. Being good while being bad: Social responsibility and the international diversification of us firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 37: 850-862.
68. Summers, B., & Wilson, N. 2003. Trade credit and customer relationships. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24: 439-455.
69. Tallman, S., & Li, J. 1996. Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 179-196.
70. Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in action. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
71. Urbina, I. 2015. 'Sea Slaves': The human misery that feeds pets and livestock. New York Times, July 27.
72. USA Today. 2001. Protesters turn to Starbucks to get attention, June 28.
73. Wade, J. B., Porac, J. F., Pollock, T. G., & Graffin, S. D. 2006. The burden of celebrity: The impact of CEO certification contests on CEO pay and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 643-660.
74. Wang, Y., Li, J., & Anupindi, R. 2015. Risky suppliers or risky supply chains? An empirical analysis of subtier supply network structure on firm performance in the high-tech sector. Ross School of Business Working Paper Series no. 1297, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
75. Williamson, O. E. 1981. The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87: 548-577.
76. Wilson, N., & Summers, B. 2002. Tradecredit termsofferedby small firms: Survey evidence and empirical analysis. Journal ofBusinessFinance & Accounting, 29: 317-351.
77. Wu, J., & Birge, J. R. 2014. Supply chain network structure and firm returns. Working Paper. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
78. Zahavi, T., & Lavie, D. 2013. Intra?industry diversification and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 978-998.
79. Zavyalova, A., Pfarrer, M., Reger, R. K., & Hubbard, T. 2016. Reputation as a benefit and a burden? How stakeholders' organizational identification affects the role of reputation following a negative event. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 253-276.
80. Zhao, X., Huo, B., Flynn, B. B., & Yeung, J. H. Y. 2008. The impact of power and relationship commitment on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 26: 368-388.